Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-7
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 7.5.4.2 Emergent Constraints Focused on Cloud Feedbacks and Present-day Climate ==== <div id="h3-50-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> A substantial number of emergent constraint studies focus on observables that are related to tropical low-cloud feedback processes ( [[#Volodin--2008|Volodin, 2008]] ; [[#Sherwood--2014|Sherwood et al., 2014]] ; [[#Zhai--2015|Zhai et al., 2015]] ; [[#Brient--2016|Brient and Schneider, 2016]] ; [[#Brient--2016|Brient et al., 2016]] ). These studies yield median ECS estimates of 3.5°C–4°C and in many cases indicate low likelihoods of values below 3°C. The approach has attracted attention since most of the spread in climate sensitivity seen in CMIP5, and earlier climate model ensembles, arises from uncertainty in low-cloud feedbacks ( [[#Bony--2005|Bony and Dufresne, 2005]] ; [[#Wyant--2006|Wyant et al., 2006]] ; [[#Randall--2007|Randall et al., 2007]] ; [[#Vial--2013|Vial et al., 2013]] ). Nevertheless, this approach assumes that all other feedback processes are unbiased ( [[#Klein--2015|Klein and Hall, 2015]] ; [[#Qu--2018|Qu et al., 2018]] ; [[#Schlund--2020|Schlund et al., 2020]] ), for instance the possibly missing negative anvil area feedback or the possibly exaggerated mixed-phase cloud feedback ( [[#7.4.2.4|Section 7.4.2.4]] ). Thus, the subset of emergent constraints that focus on low-level tropical clouds are not necessarily inconsistent with other emergent constraints of ECS. Related emergent constraints that focus on aspects of the tropical circulation and ECS have led to conflicting results ( [[#Su--2014|Su et al., 2014]] ; [[#Tian--2015|Tian, 2015]] ; [[#Lipat--2017|Lipat et al., 2017]] ; [[#Webb--2020|Webb and Lock, 2020]] ), possibly because these processes are not the dominant factors in causing the inter-model spread ( [[#Caldwell--2018|Caldwell et al., 2018]] ). The fidelity of models in reproducing aspects of temperature variability or the radiation budget has also been proposed as emergent constraints on ECS ( [[#Covey--2000|Covey et al., 2000]] ; [[#Knutti--2006|Knutti et al., 2006]] ; [[#Huber--2010|Huber et al., 2010]] ; [[#Bender--2012|Bender et al., 2012]] ; [[#Brown--2017|Brown and Caldeira, 2017]] ; [[#Siler--2018a|Siler et al., 2018a]] ). Here indices based on spatial or seasonal variability are linked to modelled ECS, and overall the group of emergent constraints yields best estimates of 3.3°C–3.7°C. Nevertheless, the physical relevance of present-day biases to the sum of long-term climate change feedbacks is unclear and therefore these constraints on ECS are not considered reliable. <div id="7.5.4.3" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="assessed-ecs-and-tcr-based-on-emergent-constraints"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-7
(section)
Add languages
Add topic