Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-11
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 11.9.2 Temperature Extremes === <div id="h2-53-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> Tables 11.4, 11.7, 11.10, 11.13, 11.16, and 11.19 include assessments for past temperature extremes and their attribution, as well as future projections. The evidence is mostly drawn from changes in metrics based on daily maximum and minimum temperatures, similar to those used in [[#11.3|Section 11.3]] . The regional assessments start from global studies that used consistent analyses for all regions globally with sufficient data. This includes [[#Dunn--2020|Dunn et al. (2020)]] for observed changes, and [[#Li--2021|Li et al. (2021)]] and the [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-11 Chapter 11] Supplementary Material (11.SM) for projections with the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble. Evidence from regional studies, and those based on the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble or CORDEX simulations, are then used to refine the confidence assessments. For attribution, Seong et al. (2020) provide a consistent analysis for AR6 regions, and Z. [[#Wang--2017a|Wang et al. (2017a)]] for SREX regions. Additional regional studies, including event attribution analyses ( [[#11.2|Section 11.2]] ), are used when available. In some regions that were not analysed in Seong et al. (2020), and those with no known event attribution studies, ''medium confidence'' of a human contribution is assessed: when there is strong evidence of changes from observations that are in the direction of model-projected changes for the future; when the magnitude of projected changes increases with global warming; and where there is no other evidence to the contrary. This assessment is further supported by an understanding of how temperature extremes change with the mean temperature and overwhelming evidence of a human contribution to the observed larger-scale changes in the mean temperature and temperature extremes. <div id="11.9.3" class="h2-container"></div> <span id="heavy-precipitation-1"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-11
(section)
Add languages
Add topic