Editing IPCC:AR6/SROCC/TS (section)

== Footnotes ==

# <span id="fn:1">Each finding is grounded in an evaluation of underlying evidence and agreement. The summary terms for evidence are: limited, medium or robust. For agreement, they are low, medium or high. In many cases, a synthesis of evidence and agreement supports an assignment of confidence. A level of confidence is expressed using five qualifiers: very low, low, medium, high and very high, and typeset in italics, e.g., medium confidence. The following terms have been used to indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: virtually certain 99–100% probability, very likely 90–100%, likely 66–100%, about as likely as not 33–66%, unlikely 0–33%, very unlikely 0–10%, exceptionally unlikely 0–1%. Additional terms (extremely likely 95–100%, more likely than not &gt;50–100%, more unlikely than likely 0–&lt;50%, extremely unlikely 0–5%) may also be used when appropriate. Assessed likelihood is typeset in italics, e.g., very likely. This Report also uses the term ‘likely range’ or ‘very likely range’ to indicate that the assessed likelihood of an outcome lies within the 17–83% or 5–95% probability range. For more details see Chapter 1, Section 1.9.2 and Figure 1.4.</span>
# <span id="fn:2">Antarctic sea ice is not shown here due to low confidence in future projections. {3.2.2}</span>
# <span id="fn:3">Marginal seas are not assessed individually as ocean regions in this report.</span>
# <span id="fn:4">NPP is estimated from the Coupled Models Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5).</span>
# <span id="fn:5">Total animal biomass is from the Fisheries and Marine Ecosystem Models Intercomparison Project (FISHMIP).</span>
# <span id="fn:6">Projections for ice sheets and glaciers in the polar regions are summarized in Chapters 4 and 2, respectively.</span>
# <span id="fn:7">Statements about uncertainty in Section 4.2 are contingent upon the RCP or other emissions assumptions that accompany them. In Section 4.4, the entirety of information facing a decision maker is taken into consideration, including the unknown path of future emissions, in assessing uncertainty. Depending on which perspective is chosen, uncertainty may or may not be characterised as ‘deep’.</span>

<span id="section-6"></span>