Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-11
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
ClimateKG item
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 11.1.1 Context === <div id="h2-1-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> The Australasia region is defined as the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and territories of Australia and New Zealand. In both countries, climate adaptation is largely implemented at a sub-national level through the devolution of functions constitutionally or by statute, alongside disaster risk reduction ( [[#COAG--2011|COAG, 2011]] ; [[#Lawrence--2015|Lawrence et al., 2015]] ; [[#Macintosh--2015|Macintosh et al., 2015]] ). Australia’s economy is dominated by financial and insurance services, education, mining, construction, tourism, health care and social assistance (ABS, 2018) with Australian exports accruing mostly from mining (ABS, 2018; ABS, 2019). In New Zealand, service industries, including tourism, collectively account for around two-thirds of GDP ( [[#NZ%20Treasury--2016|NZ Treasury, 2016]] ). The primary sector contributes 6% of New Zealand’s GDP and over half of the country’s export earnings ( [[#NZ%20Treasury--2016|NZ Treasury, 2016]] ). Existing vulnerabilities expose and exacerbate inequalities between rural, regional and urban areas, Indigenous and non-Indigenous Peoples, those with health and disability needs, and between generations, incomes and health status, increasing the relative climate change risk faced by some groups and places ( ''high confidence'' ) ( [[#Jones--2014|Jones et al., 2014]] ; [[#Bertram--2015|Bertram, 2015]] ; [[#Perry--2017|Perry, 2017]] ; [[#Hazledine--2018|Hazledine and Rashbrooke, 2018]] ). Previous IPCC reports (Table 11.1) have documented observed climate impacts, projected risks, adaptation challenges and opportunities. This chapter presents more evidence of observed climate impacts and adaptation, better quantification of socioeconomic risks, new information about cascading and compounding risks, greater emphasis on adaptation enablers and barriers, and links to climate resilient development. '''Table 11.1 |''' Summary of key conclusions from the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (AR5) Australasia chapter ( [[#Reisinger--2014|Reisinger et al., 2014]] ) and relevant conclusions from the IPCC Special Reports on Global Warming of 1.5°C ( [[#IPCC--2018|IPCC, 2018]] ), Climate Change and Land ( [[#IPCC--2019a|IPCC, 2019a]] ) and Oceans and Cryosphere ( [[#IPCC--2019b|IPCC, 2019b]] ). {| class="wikitable" |- ! Conclusions ! Report |- | Our regional climate is changing ( ''very high confidence'' ) and warming will continue through the 21st century ( ''virtually certain'' ) with more hot days, fewer cold days, less snow, less rainfall in southern Australia and the northeast of both of New Zealand’s islands, more rainfall in western New Zealand, more extreme rainfall, SLR, increased fire weather in southern Australia and across New Zealand and fewer cyclones but a greater proportion of intense cyclones. | ( [[#Reisinger--2014|Reisinger et al., 2014]] ) |- | Key risks include changes in the structure and composition of Australian coral reefs, loss of montane ecosystems, increased flood damage, reduced water resources in southern Australia, more deaths and infrastructure damage during heatwaves, more fire-related impacts on ecosystems and settlements in southern Australia and across New Zealand, greater risk to coastal infrastructure and ecosystems and reduced water availability in the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) and southern Australia ( ''high confidence'' ) ''.'' Benefits are projected for some sectors and locations ( ''high confidence'' ), including reduced winter mortality and energy demand for heating, increased forest growth and enhanced pasture productivity. | |- | Adaptation is occurring and becoming mainstreamed in some planning processes ( ''high confidence'' ). Adaptive capacity is considered generally high in many human systems, but adaptation implementation faces major barriers, especially for transformational responses ( ''high confidence'' ). Some synergies and trade-offs exist between different adaptation responses and between mitigation and adaptation, with interactions occurring both within and outside the region ( ''very high confidence'' ). | |- | Vulnerability remains uncertain due to incomplete consideration of socioeconomic dimensions ( ''very high confidence'' ), including governance, institutions, patterns of wealth and ageing, access to technology and information, labour force participation and societal values. | |- | Emissions reductions under Nationally Determined Contributions from signatories to the Paris Agreement are consistent with a global warming of 2.5°C–3.0°C above pre-industrial temperatures by 2100. Much deeper emission reductions are needed prior to 2030 to limit warming to 1.5°C. There are limits to adaptation and adaptive capacity for some human and natural systems at global warming of 1.5°C, with associated losses. | ( [[#IPCC--2018|IPCC, 2018]] ) |- | Climate impacts will disproportionately affect the welfare of impoverished and vulnerable people because they lack adaptation resources. Strengthening the climate-action capacities of national and sub-national authorities, civil society, the private sector, Indigenous People and local communities can support implementation of actions. | |- | Land-related responses that contribute to climate change adaptation and mitigation can also combat desertification and land degradation and enhance food security. | ( [[#IPCC--2019a|IPCC, 2019a]] ) |- | Appropriate design of policies, institutions and governance systems at all scales can contribute to land-related adaptation and mitigation while facilitating the pursuit of climate-adaptive development pathways. | |- | Mutually supportive climate and land policies have the potential to save resources, amplify social resilience, support ecological restoration and foster collaboration between stakeholders. | |- | Near-term action to address climate change adaptation and mitigation, desertification, land degradation and food security can bring social, ecological, economic and development co-benefits. Delaying action (both mitigation and adaptation) will be more costly. | |- | The rate of global mean SLR of 3.6 mm yr −1 for 2006–2015 is unprecedented over the last century. Extreme wave heights, coastal erosion and flooding have increased in the Southern Ocean by around 1.0 cm yr −1 over the period 1985–2018. | ( [[#IPCC--2019b|IPCC, 2019b]] ) |- | Some species of plants and animals have increased in abundance, shifted their range and established in new areas as glaciers receded and the snow-free season lengthened. Some cold-adapted or snow-dependent species have declined in abundance, increasing their risk of extinction, notably on mountain summits. | |- | Many marine species have shifted their range and seasonal activities. Altered interactions between species have caused cascading impacts on ecosystem structure and functioning. | |- | Mean SLR projections are higher by 0.1 m compared to AR5 under RCP8.5 in 2100. Extreme sea level events that are historically rare (once per century) are projected to occur frequently (at least once yr −1 ) at many locations by 2050. | |- | Projected ecosystem responses include losses of species habitat and diversity and degradation of ecosystem functions. Warm water corals are at high risk already and are projected to transition to very high risk even if global warming is limited to 1.5°C. | |- | Governance arrangements (e.g., marine protected areas, spatial plans and water management systems) are too fragmented across administrative boundaries and sectors to provide integrated responses to the increasing and cascading risks. Financial, technological, institutional and other barriers exist for implementing responses. | |- | Enabling climate resilience and sustainable development depends critically on urgent and ambitious emissions reductions coupled with coordinated, sustained and increasingly ambitious adaptation actions. This includes better cooperation and coordination among governing authorities, education and climate literacy, sharing of information and knowledge, finance, addressing social vulnerability and equity, and institutional support. | |} <div id="11.1.2 " class="h2-container"></div> <span id="economic-demographic-and-social-trends"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-11
(section)
Add languages
Add topic