Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-3
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 3.5.4.3.1 Adaptive ecosystem governance ===== ‘Adaptive Ecosystem Governance’ differs from conventional resource management or integrated ecosystem management (Chapin III et al., 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r2293|2293]]</sup> ; Chapin III et al., 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r2294|2294]]</sup> ; Chapin III et al., 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r2295|2295]]</sup> ), with a strong focus on trajectories of change (i.e., emergence), implying that maintaining ecosystems in a state of equilibrium is not possible (Biggs et al., 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r2296|2296]]</sup> ; ARR, 2016). This approach strengthens response options by maintaining or increasing resource diversity (to support human adaptation) and biological diversity (to support ecosystem adaptation) (Biggs et al., 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r2297|2297]]</sup> ; Chapin III et al., 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r2298|2298]]</sup> ; Quinlan et al., 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r2299|2299]]</sup> ) ( ''high confidence'' ). Adaptive ecosystem governance emphasises iterative social learning processes of observing, understanding and acting with collaborative partnerships, such as adaptive co-management arrangements currently used in regions of the Arctic (Armitage et al., 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r2300|2300]]</sup> ; Dale and Armitage, 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r2301|2301]]</sup> ; Chapin III et al., 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r2302|2302]]</sup> ; Arp et al., 2019 <sup>[[#fn:r2303|2303]]</sup> ). This approach is also currently realised through adaptive management of Arctic fisheries in Alaska that combines annual measures and within-season provisions informed by assessments of future ecosystem trends (Section 3.5.2.1), and the use of simulation models with Canadian caribou co-management boards to assess the cumulative effects of proposed land use change with climate change (Gunn et al., 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r2304|2304]]</sup> ; Russell, 2014a <sup>[[#fn:r2305|2305]]</sup> ; Russell, 2014b <sup>[[#fn:r2306|2306]]</sup> ). Linking these regional efforts to pan-polar programs can enhance resilience building cross multiple scales (e.g., Gunn et al., 2013) ( ''medium confidence'' ). <div id="section-3-5-4-3-resilience-based-ecosystem-stewardship-block-3"></div> <span id="spatial-planning-for-biodiversity"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-3
(section)
Add languages
Add topic