Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-13
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Box 13.4 | Procedural Justice === <div id="h2-46-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> Decision-making consistent with energy and climate justice requires attention to procedural justice ( [[#McCauley--2018|McCauley and Heffron 2018]] ), which includes how decisions are made, and who is involved and has influence on decisions ( [[#Sovacool--2015|Sovacool and Dworkin 2015]] ). Procedural justice emphasises the importance of equitable access to decision-making processes and non-discriminatory engagement with all stakeholders ( [[#Jenkins--2016|Jenkins et al. 2016]] ), attention to the capability, particularly of marginalised groups, to shape decisions ( [[#Holland--2017|Holland 2017]] ) and recognition of their specific vulnerabilities in collective political processes ( [[#Schlosberg--2012|Schlosberg 2012]] ). Consensus-building institutions should avoid reducing normative questions to technical ones, recognising that values, interests and behaviours are all shaped by ongoing climate governance ( [[#Ryder--2018|Ryder 2018]] ; [[#Schwanen--2021|Schwanen 2021]] ). Additionally, communities affected by low-carbon transition may face challenges in articulating their understandings and experiences, which needs to be addressed in the design of climate institutions ( [[#Ryder--2018|Ryder 2018]] ; [[#Schwanen--2021|Schwanen 2021]] ). Spatially localised alternative discourses of justice are often more recognised socially than national and universal framings of climate justice ( [[#Bailey--2017|Bailey 2017]] ). Participatory forms of governance such as climate assemblies and citizen juries ( [[#Ney--2015|Ney and Verweij 2015]] ) can help enhance the legitimacy of institutional decisions, even while empirical assessments suggest that these approaches continue to face practical challenges ( [[#Devaney--2020|Devaney et al. 2020]] ; [[#Sandover--2021|Sandover et al. 2021]] ; [[#Creasy--2021|Creasy et al. 2021]] ). <div id="Box 13.5 | South Africa’s Monitoring and Ev" class="h2-container"></div> <span id="box-13.5-south-africas-monitoring-and-ev-aluation-system"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-13
(section)
Add languages
Add topic