Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-5
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 5.13.2 Trade-offs Generated by Agricultural Intensification and Expansion === <div id="h2-49-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> Agricultural intensification seeks to increase agricultural productivity per input unit, reducing the pressure on land use and generating positive impacts in GHG emissions ( [[#Mbow--2019|Mbow et al., 2019]] ), but valuing the final effect requires common metrics in terms of carbon capture or emission reductions ( [[#Searchinger--2018|Searchinger et al., 2018]] ). It has been suggested to address multiple SDGs (SDG2, SDG13, SDG15) but only occasionally leads to simultaneous positive ecosystem service and well-being outcomes ( [[#Rasmussen--2018|Rasmussen et al., 2018]] ). When the process relies only on increasing input use, there is a risk of generating adverse outcomes that may override positive effects, such as CO 2 emissions, ( [[#McGill--2018|McGill et al., 2018]] ), NOx emissions ( [[#Hickman--2017|Hickman et al., 2017]] ), soil salinisation and groundwater depletion ( [[#Doody--2015|Doody et al., 2015]] ; [[#Daliakopoulos--2016|Daliakopoulos et al., 2016]] ; [[#Fragaszy--2016|Fragaszy and Closas, 2016]] ; [[#Foster--2018|Foster et al., 2018]] ; [[#Flörke--2019|Flörke et al., 2019]] ). Agricultural intensification could meet short-term food security and livelihood goals, but reduces biological and landscape diversity, and ecosystem services ( ''high confidence'' ) ( [[#Campbell--2017|Campbell et al., 2017]] ; [[#Balmford--2018|Balmford et al., 2018]] ; [[#Springmann--2018|Springmann et al., 2018]] ; [[#Ickowitz--2019|Ickowitz et al., 2019]] ; [[#Mbow--2019|Mbow et al., 2019]] ). Agricultural intensification can also affect livelihoods of small-scale producers, compromising food security. It can increase low-waged casual farm work, increasing gender and income inequity ( [[#Bigler--2017|Bigler et al., 2017]] ; [[#Clay--2019|Clay and King, 2019]] ; Table 5.18). Land available for provisioning ecosystem services is declining in many places because of agricultural expansion, bioenergy crops and reforestation for mitigation ( [[#Kongsager--2018|Kongsager, 2018]] ), with adverse climate impacts ( [[#Froese--2019|Froese and Schilling, 2019]] ). Cropland expansion can deteriorate biodiversity ( [[#Delzeit--2017|Delzeit et al., 2017]] ), water quality ( [[#Ayala--2016|Ayala et al., 2016]] ) and carbon storage ( [[#Goldstein--2012|Goldstein et al., 2012]] ) and increase water demands ( [[#Yokohata--2020|Yokohata et al., 2020]] ). A systems-based perspective on land use is needed to address climate change impacts on nutrition security and ecosystem services ( [[#Springmann--2018|Springmann et al., 2018]] ; [[#IPCC--2019b|IPCC, 2019b]] ; [[#Willett--2019|Willett et al., 2019]] ). Land sparing sets aside some land for conservation purposes and intensifies production on farmland ( [[#Balmford--2018|Balmford et al., 2018]] ; [[#Benton--2018|Benton et al., 2018]] ; [[#IPCC--2019b|IPCC, 2019b]] ), with potential to offset GHG emissions ( [[#Lamb--2016|Lamb et al., 2016]] ). Alternatively, ‘land sharing’ approach employs principles such as minimising fossil-fuel-based inputs, maximising synergies, and addressing climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as biodiversity ( [[#Kremen--2012|Kremen and Miles, 2012]] ; [[#Kremen--2015|Kremen, 2015]] ; [[#Kremen--2018|Kremen and Merenlender, 2018]] ; [[#HLPE--2019|HLPE, 2019]] ; [[#5.1|Section 5.1]] 4, Box on Agroecology). Community-managed initiatives can address biodiversity and ecosystem conservation, livelihoods, food provisioning and other ecosystem services ( [[#Kremen--2018|Kremen and Merenlender, 2018]] ; [[#HLPE--2019|HLPE, 2019]] ). The concept of sustainable intensification has emerged, looking for enhancements in environmental outcomes, while maintaining or increasing agricultural systems performance. There is a potential to find synergies between agricultural production and landscape systems if systems are designed to operate within planetary boundaries ( [[#Rockström--2017|Rockström et al., 2017]] ; [[#Liao--2018|Liao and Brown, 2018]] ; [[#Pretty--2018|Pretty, 2018]] ; [[#Pretty--2018|Pretty et al., 2018]] ). <div id="5.13.3" class="h2-container"></div> <span id="competition-between-food-systems-in-land-and-ocean"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-5
(section)
Add languages
Add topic