Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-2
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 2.2.5 Lake and River Ice === <div id="section-2-2-5lake-and-river-ice-block-1"></div> Based on ''limited evidence'' , AR5 reported shorter seasonal ice cover duration during the past decades ( ''low confidence)'' , however, did not specifically address changes in mountain lakes and rivers. Observations of extent, timing, duration and thickness of lake and river ice rely mostly on ''in situ'' measurements (e.g., Sharma et al., 2019) and, increasingly on remote sensing (Duguay et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r218|218]]</sup> ). Lake and river ice studies focusing specifically on mountain regions are rare but observations from lakes in the European Alps, Scandinavia and the Tibetan Plateau show highly variable trends in ice cover duration during the past decades. For example, Cai et al. (2019) reported shorter ice cover duration for 40 lakes and longer duration for 18 lakes on the Tibetan Plateau during the period 2000β2017. Similarly, using microwave remote sensing, Du et al. (2017) found shorter ice cover duration for 43 out of 71 lakes >50 km 2 including lakes on the Tibetan Plateau during 2002β2015, but only five of these had statistically significant trends ( ''p'' β < β 0.05), due to large interannual variability. The variable trends in the duration of lake ice cover on the Tibetan Plateau between 2002β2015 corresponded to variable trends in surface water temperatures. Of 52 study lakes in this region, 31 lakes showed a mean warming rate of 0.055 Β± 0.033 Β°C yr -1 , and 21 lakes showed a mean cooling rate of -0.053 Β± 0.038 Β°C yr -1 during 2001β2012 (Zhang et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r219|219]]</sup> ). Kainz et al. (2017) <sup>[[#fn:r220|220]]</sup> reported a significant ( ''p'' β < β 0.05) increase in the interannual variability in ice cover duration for a subalpine lake in Austria during 1921β2015 in addition to a significant trend in later freeze on, earlier ice break up and shorter ice cover duration. A significant ( ''p'' < 0.05) trend towards shorter ice cover duration was found for another Austrian alpine lake during 1972β2015 (Niedrist et al., 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r209|209]]</sup> ). Highly variable trends were also found in the timing and magnitude of river ice jams during 1903β2015, as reported by Rokaya et al. (2018) for Canadian rivers, including rivers in the mountains. Most of the variability in river ice trends could be explained by variable water flow, in particular due to flow regulation. There is ''high confidence'' that air temperature and solar radiation are the most important drivers to explain observed changes of lake ice dynamics (Sharma et al., 2019 <sup>[[#fn:r210|210]]</sup> ). In mountainous regions where the interannual variability in ice cover duration is high, additional drivers become important, for example, morphometry, wind exposure, salinity, and hydrology, in particular hydrological processes driven by glaciers (KropΓ‘cek et al., 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r211|211]]</sup> ; Song et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r212|212]]</sup> ; Yao et al., 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r213|213]]</sup> ; Gou et al., 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r214|214]]</sup> ). Despite high spatial and temporal variability in lake and river ice cover dynamics in mountain regions there is ''limited evidence'' ( ''high agreement)'' that further air temperature increases will result in a general trend towards later freezing, earlier break-up, and shorter ice cover duration in the future (Gebre et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r215|215]]</sup> ; Du et al., 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r216|216]]</sup> ). Overall, there is only ''limited evidence'' on changes in lake and river ice specifically in the mountains, indicating a trend, but not universally, towards shorter lake ice cover duration consistent with increased water temperature. <div id="section-2-2-5lake-and-river-ice-block-2" class="box"></div> <span id="box-2.2-local-regional-and-global-climate-feedbacks-involving-the-mountain-cryosphere"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-2
(section)
Add languages
Add topic