Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-6
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 6.2.2.1 Lightning NO <sub>x</sub> ==== <div id="h3-1-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Lightning contributes approximately 10% of the total NO <sub>x</sub> emissions ( [[#Murray--2016|Murray, 2016]] ). Since lightning NO <sub>x</sub> (LNO <sub>x</sub> ) is predominantly released in the upper troposphere, it has a disproportionately large impact on ozone and OH, and on the lifetime of methanecompared with surface NO <sub>x</sub> emissions. Whereas the global spatial and temporal distribution of lightning flashes can be characterized thanks to satellite-borne and ground sensors ( [[#Virts--2013|Virts et al., 2013]] ; [[#Cecil--2014|Cecil et al., 2014]] ), constraining the amount of NO <sub>x</sub> produced per flash (Miyazaki et al. , 2014; Medici et al. , 2017; Nault et al. , 2017; Marais et al. , 2018; D.J. Allen et al. , 2019; Bucsela et al. , 2019) and its vertical allocation ( [[#Koshak--2014|Koshak et al., 2014]] ; [[#Medici--2017|Medici et al., 2017]] ) has been more elusive. Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) models in CMIP5 used a range of LNO <sub>x4</sub> between 1.2β9.7 TgN y <sup>β1</sup> (Lamarque et al., 2013b). In CMIP6, the corresponding LNO <sub>x</sub> range is between 3.2β7.6 TgN y <sup>β1</sup> ( [[#Griffiths--2021|Griffiths et al., 2021]] ). All CMIP6 models (as well as most models included in CMIP5, [[#Young--2013|Young et al., 2013]] ) apply a parametrization that relates cloud-top height to lightning intensity ( [[#Price--1992|Price and Rind, 1992]] ), projecting an increase in LNO <sub>x</sub> in a warmer world in the range of 0.27β0.61 TgN yr <sup>β1</sup> Β°C <sup>β1</sup> ( [[#Thornhill--2021a|Thornhill et al., 2021a]] ). However, models using parametrizations based on convection ( [[#Grewe--2001|Grewe et al., 2001]] ), updraft mass flux ( [[#Allen--2002|Allen and Pickering, 2002]] ) or ice flux ( [[#Finney--2016a|Finney et al., 2016a]] ) show either much less sensitivity or a negative response ( [[#Finney--2016b|Finney et al., 2016b]] , 2018; [[#Clark--2017|Clark et al., 2017]] ). In summary, the total present-day global lightning NO <sub>x</sub> emissions are still estimated to be within a factor of two. There is ''high confidence'' that LNO <sub>x</sub> are perturbed by climate change; however, there is ''low confidence'' in the sign of the change due to fundamental uncertainties in parametrizations. <sub></sub> <div id="6.2.2.2" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="no-x-emissions-from-soils"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-6
(section)
Add languages
Add topic