Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-1
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 1.5.3 Vulnerabilities in Natural Systems, Ecosystems, and Human Systems === <div id="section-1-5-3-vulnerabilities-in-natural-systems-ecosystems-and-human-systems-block-1"></div> Direct and indirect risks to natural systems are influenced by vulnerability to climate change as well as deterioration of ecosystem services. For example, about half of species assessed on the northeast United States continental shelf exhibited high to very high climate vulnerability due to temperature preferences and changes in habitat space (Hare et al., 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r256|256]]</sup> ), with corresponding northward range shifts for many species (Kleisner et al., 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r257|257]]</sup> ) and increased vulnerability for organisms or ecosystems unable to migrate or evolve at the rate required to adapt to ocean and cryosphere changes (Miller et al., 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r258|258]]</sup> ). Non-climatic pressures also magnify the vulnerability of ocean and cryosphere ecosystems to climate-related changes, such as overfishing, coastal development, and pollution, including plastic pollution (Halpern et al., 2008 <sup>[[#fn:r259|259]]</sup> ; Halpern et al., 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r260|260]]</sup> ; IPBES, 2018a <sup>[[#fn:r261|261]]</sup> ; IPBES, 2018b <sup>[[#fn:r262|262]]</sup> ; IPBES, 2018c <sup>[[#fn:r263|263]]</sup> ; IPBES, 2018d <sup>[[#fn:r264|264]]</sup> ). Conventional (fossil fuel-based) plastics produced in 2015 accounted for 3.8% of global CO 2 emissions and could reach up to 15% by 2050 (Zheng and Suh, 2019 <sup>[[#fn:r265|265]]</sup> ). The vulnerability of mountain, Arctic and coastal communities is affected by social, political, historical, cultural, economic, institutional, environmental, geographical and/or demographic factors such as gender, age, race, class, caste, Indigeneity and disability (Thomas et al., 2019 <sup>[[#fn:r266|266]]</sup> ; Sections 2.3.6 and 3.5; Cross-Chapter Box 9). Disparities and inequities in such factors may result in social exclusion, inequalities and non-climatic challenges to health and wellbeing, economic development and basic human rights (Adger et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r267|267]]</sup> ; Olsson et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r268|268]]</sup> ; Smith et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r269|269]]</sup> ). Those less advantaged often also have reduced access to and control over the social, financial, technological and environmental resources that are required for adaptation and transformation (Oppenheimer et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r270|270]]</sup> ; AMAP, 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r271|271]]</sup> ), thus limiting options for coping and adapting to change (Hijioka et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r272|272]]</sup> ). However, even populations with greater wealth and privilege can be vulnerable to some climate change risks (Cardona et al., 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r273|273]]</sup> ; Smith et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r274|274]]</sup> ), especially if sources of wealth and wellbeing depend upon established infrastructure that is poorly suited to ocean or cryosphere change. Institutions and governance can shape vulnerability and adaptive capacity, and it can be challenging for weak governance structures to respond effectively to extreme or persistent climate change hazards (Sections 6.4 and 6.9; Cross-Chapter Box 3 in Chapter 1; Berrang-Ford et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r275|275]]</sup> ; Hijioka et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r276|276]]</sup> ). Furthermore, populations can be negatively impacted by inappropriate climate change mitigation and/or adaptation policies, particularly ones that further marginalise their knowledge, culture, values and livelihoods (Field et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r277|277]]</sup> ; Cross-Chapter Box 4 in Chapter 1). Vulnerability is not static in place and time, nor homogeneously experienced. The vulnerabilities of individuals, groups, and populations to climate change is dynamic and diverse, and reflects changing societal and environmental conditions (Thomas et al., 2019 <sup>[[#fn:r278|278]]</sup> ). SROCC examines vulnerability following the conceptual definition presented in Cross-Chapter Box 2 in Chapter 1, and vulnerability in human systems is treated in relative rather than absolute terms. <span id="addressing-the-causes-and-consequences-of-climate-change-for-the-ocean-and-cryosphere"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-1
(section)
Add languages
Add topic