Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-7
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 7.3.2.2 Methane (CH <sub>4</sub> ) ==== <div id="h3-5-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> The SARF for methane (CH <sub>4</sub> ) has been substantially increased due to updates to spectroscopic data and inclusion of shortwave absorption ( [[#Etminan--2016|Etminan et al., 2016]] ). Adjustments have been calculated in nine climate models by [[#Smith--2018b|Smith et al. (2018b)]] . Since CH <sub>4</sub> is found to absorb in the shortwave near infrared, only adjustments from those models including this absorption are taken into account. For these models the adjustments act to reduce the ERF because the shortwave absorption leads to tropospheric heating and reductions in upper tropospheric cloud amounts. The adjustment is β14% Β± 15%, which counteracts much of the increase in SARF identified by [[#Etminan--2016|Etminan et al. (2016)]] . [[#Modak--2018|Modak et al. (2018)]] also found negative forcing adjustments from a methane perturbation including shortwave absorption in the NCAR CAM5 model, in agreement with the above assessment. The uncertainty in the shortwave component leads to a higher radiative modelling uncertainty (14%) than for CO <sub>2</sub> ( [[#Etminan--2016|Etminan et al., 2016]] ). When combined with the uncertainty in the adjustment, this gives an overall uncertainty of Β±20%. There is ''high confidence'' in the spectroscopic revision but only ''medium confidence'' in the adjustment modification. CH <sub>4</sub> concentrations have increased from 729 ppb in 1750 to 1866 ppb in 2019 [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-2#2.2.3.3|Section 2.2.3.3]] ). The historical ERF estimate from AR5 of 0.48 Β± 0.10 W m <sup>β2</sup> (1750β2011) is revised to 0.54 Β± 0.11 W m <sup>β2</sup> (1750 to 2019) in this assessment from a combination of spectroscopic radiative efficiency revisions (+0.12 W m <sup>β2</sup> ), adjustments (β0.08 W m <sup>β2</sup> ) and the 63 ppb rise in atmospheric CH <sub>4</sub> concentrations between 2011 and 2019 (+0.03 W m <sup>β2</sup> ). As the adjustments are assessed to be small, there is ''high confidence'' in the overall assessment of ERF from methane. Increased methane leads to tropospheric ozone production and increased stratospheric water vapour, so that an attribution of forcing to methane emissions gives a larger effect than that directly from the methane concentration itself. This is discussed in detail in ( [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-6|Chapter 6]] (Section 6.4.2) and shown in Figure 6.12. <div id="7.3.2.3" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="nitrous-oxide-n-2-o"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-7
(section)
Add languages
Add topic