Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-7
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 7.2.4 Risks arising from hazard, exposure and vulnerability === <div id="section-7-2-4-risks-arising-from-hazard-exposure-and-vulnerability-block-1"></div> Table 7.1 shows hazards from land-climate-society interactions identified in previous chapters, or in other IPCC reports (with supplementary hazards appearing in the Appendix); the regions that are exposed or will be exposed to these hazards; components of the land-climate systems and societies that are vulnerable to the hazard; the risk associated with these impacts and the available indicative policy responses. The last column shows representative supporting literature. Included are forest dieback, extreme events in multiple economic and agricultural regimes (also see Sections 7.2.2.1 and 7.2.2.2), disruption in flow regimes in river systems, climate change mitigation impacts (Section 7.2.3.2), competition for land (plastic substitution by cellulose, charcoal production), land degradation and desertification (Section 7.2.2.8), loss of carbon sinks, permafrost destabilisation (Section 7.2.2.7), and stranded assets (Section 7.3.4). Other hazards such as from failure of carbon storage, renewable energy impacts on land use, wild-fire in forest-urban transition context, extreme events effects on cultural heritage and urban air pollution from surrounding land use are covered in Table 7.1 extension in the appendix as well in Section 7.5.6. <div id="section-7-2-4-risks-arising-from-hazard-exposure-and-vulnerability-block-2"></div> <span id="table-7.1"></span> <!-- START TABLE --> '''Table 7.1''' <span id="characterising-landclimate-risk-and-indicative-policy-responses."></span> '''Characterising land–climate risk and indicative policy responses.''' Table shows hazards from land–climate–society interactions identified in previous chapters or in other IPCC reports; the regions that are exposed or will be exposed to these hazards; components of the land-climate systems and societies that are vulnerable to the hazard; the risk associated with these impacts and the available policy responses and response options from Chapter 6. The last column shows representative supporting literature. <!-- TABLE --> {| class="wikitable" |- Land–climate– society interaction hazard Exposure Vulnerability Risk Policy response (indicative) References |- Forest dieback Widespread across biomes and regions Marginalised population with insecure land tenure – Loss of forest-based livelihoods – Loss of identity * – Land rights * – Community-based conservation * – Enhanced political enfranchisement * – Manager–scientist partnershipsfor adaptation silviculture Allen et al. 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r1573|1573]]</sup> ; McDowell and<br /> Allen 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1574|1574]]</sup> ; Sunderlin et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1575|1575]]</sup> ; Belcher et al. 2005 <sup>[[#fn:r1576|1576]]</sup> ; Soizic et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1577|1577]]</sup> ; Nagel et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1578|1578]]</sup> |- Endangered species and ecosystems – Extinction<br /> – Loss of ecosystem services (ES) – Cultural loss – Effective enforcement of protected areas and curbs on illegal trade – Ecosystem restoration<br /> – Protection of indigenous people Bailis et al. 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1579|1579]]</sup> ; Cameron et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1580|1580]]</sup> |- Extreme events<br /> in multiple economic and agricultural regimes Global * – Food-importing countries * – Low-income indebtedness * – Net food buyer – Conflict<br /> – Migration<br /> – Food inflation<br /> – Loss of life<br /> – Disease, malnutrition – Farmer distress * – Insurance * – Social protection encouragingdiversity of sources * – Climate smart agriculture * – Land rights and tenure * – Adaptive public distribution systems Fraser et al. 2005 <sup>[[#fn:r1581|1581]]</sup> ; Schmidhuber and Tubiello 2007 <sup>[[#fn:r1582|1582]]</sup> ; Lipper et al. 2014a <sup>[[#fn:r1583|1583]]</sup> ; Lunt et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1584|1584]]</sup> ; Tigchelaar et al. 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1585|1585]]</sup> ; Casellas Connors and Janetos 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1586|1586]]</sup> |- Disruption of flow regimes<br /> in river systems – 1.5 billion people, Regional (e.g., South Asia, Australia) – Aral sea and others * – Water-intensive agriculture * – Freshwater, estuarine and near coastal ecosystems * – Fishers * – Endangered species and ecosystems – Loss of livelihoods and identity – Migration<br /> – Indebtedness * – Build alternative scenarios for economies and livelihoods based on non-consumptive use (e.g., wild capture fisheries) * – Define and maintain ecological flows in rivers for target species and ES * – Experiment with alternative, lesswater-consuming crops and watermanagement strategies * – Redefine SDGs to include freshwaterecosystems or adopt alternative metrics of sustainability Based on Nature’s Contributions to People (NCP) Craig 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r1587|1587]]</sup> ;<br /> Di Baldassarre<br /> et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1588|1588]]</sup> ;<br /> Verma et al. 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r1589|1589]]</sup> ; Ghosh et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1590|1590]]</sup> ; Higgins et al. 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1591|1591]]</sup> ; Hall et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1592|1592]]</sup> ; Youn et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1593|1593]]</sup> |} <!-- END TABLE --> <!-- TABLE --> {| class="wikitable" |- Land–climate– society interaction hazard Exposure Vulnerability Risk Policy response (indicative) References |- Depletion/exhaustion of groundwater * – Widespread across semi-arid and humid biomes * – India, China and the USA * – Small Islands * – Farmers, drinking water supply * – Irrigation * – See forest note above * – Agriculturalproduction * – Urban sustainability(Phoenix, US) * – Reduction in dry-season river flows * – Sea level rise * – Food insecurity * – Water insecurity * – Distress migration * – Conflict * – Disease * – Inundation ofcoastal regions, estuaries and deltas * – Monitoring of emerging groundwater-climate linkages * – Adaptation strategies that reduce dependence on deep groundwater * – Regulation of groundwater use * – Shift to less water-intensive rainfedcrops and pasture * – Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater Wada et al. 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r1594|1594]]</sup> ; Rodell et al. 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r1595|1595]]</sup> ; Taylor et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1596|1596]]</sup> ; Aeschbach-Hertig and Gleeson 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r1597|1597]]</sup> |- Climate change mitigation impacts Across various biomes, especially semi-arid and aquatic, where renewable energy projects (solar, biomass, wind and small hydro) are sited * – Fishers and pastoralists * – Farmers * – Endangered rangerestricted species and ecosystems * – Extinction of species * – Downstreamloss of ES * – Loss of livelihoodsand identity of fisher/pastoralist communities * – Loss of regional food security – Avoidance and informed siting in priority basins – Mitigation of impacts – Certification Zomer et al. 2008 <sup>[[#fn:r1598|1598]]</sup> ; Nyong et al. 2007 <sup>[[#fn:r1599|1599]]</sup> ; Pielke et al. 2002 <sup>[[#fn:r1600|1600]]</sup> ; Schmidhuber and Tubiello 2007 <sup>[[#fn:r1601|1601]]</sup> ; Jumani et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1602|1602]]</sup> ; Eldridge et al. 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1603|1603]]</sup> ; Bryan et al. 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r1604|1604]]</sup> ; Scarlat and Dallemand 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1605|1605]]</sup> |- Competition for land e.g., plastic substitution<br /> by cellulose, charcoal production Peri-urban and rural areas in developing countries – Rural landscapes; farmers; charcoal suppliers;<br /> small businesses – Land degradation; loss of ES; GHG emissions; lower adaptive capacity – Sustainability certification; producer permits; subsidies for efficient kilns Woollen et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1606|1606]]</sup> ; Kiruki et al. 2017a <sup>[[#fn:r1607|1607]]</sup> |- Land degradation and desertification Arid, semi-arid and sub-humid regions – Farmers<br /> – Pastoralists – Biodiversity * – Food insecurity * – Drought * – Migration * – Loss of agro andwild biodiversity * – Restoration of ecosystems and management of invasive species * – Climate smart agriculture and livestock management * – Managing economic impacts of global and local drivers * – Changes in relief and rehabilitation policies * – Land degradation neutrality Fleskens, Luuk, Stringer 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1608|1608]]</sup> ; Lambin et al. 2001 <sup>[[#fn:r1609|1609]]</sup> ; Cowie et al. 2018a <sup>[[#fn:r1610|1610]]</sup> ; Few and Tebboth 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1611|1611]]</sup> ; Sandstrom and Juhola 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1612|1612]]</sup> |- Loss of carbon sinks Widespread across biomes and regions – Tropical forests – Boreal soils – Feedback to global and regional climate change – Conservation prioritisation of tropical forests – Afforestation Barnett et al. 2005 <sup>[[#fn:r1613|1613]]</sup> ; Tribbia and Moser 2008 <sup>[[#fn:r1614|1614]]</sup> |- Permafrost destabilisation Arctic and Sub-Arctic regions – Soils<br /> – Indigenous communities – Biodiversity – Enhanced GHG emissions – Enhanced carbon uptake from novel ecosystem after thaw – Adapt to emerging wetlands Schuur et al. 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1615|1615]]</sup> |- Stranded assets * – Economies transitioning to low- carbon pathways * – Oil economies * – Coastal regionsfacing inundation – Coal-based power – Oilrefineries<br /> – Plastic industry<br /> – Large dams – Coastal infrastructure * – Disruption of regional economies and conflict * – Unemployment * – Pushback against renewable energy * – Migration * – Insurance and tax cuts * – Long-term power purchase agreements * – Economic and technical supportfor transitioning economies * – transforming oil wealth intorenewable energy leadership * – Redevelopment using adaptation * – OPEC investment in informationsharing for transition Farfan and Breyer 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1616|1616]]</sup> ; Ansar et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1617|1617]]</sup> ; Van de Graaf 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1618|1618]]</sup> ; Trieb et al. 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1619|1619]]</sup> |} <!-- END TABLE --> <span id="consequences-of-climate-land-change-for-human-well-being-and-sustainable-development"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-7
(section)
Add languages
Add topic