Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SR15/Chapter-1
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 1.3.3 Uncertainty and Non-Linearity of Impacts === <div id="section-1-3-3-block-1"></div> Uncertainties in projections of future climate change and impacts come from a variety of different sources, including the assumptions made regarding future emission pathways (Moss et al., 2010) <sup>[[#fn:r229|229]]</sup> , the inherent limitations and assumptions of the climate models used for the projections, including limitations in simulating regional climate variability (James et al., 2017) <sup>[[#fn:r230|230]]</sup> , downscaling and bias-correction methods (Ekström et al., 2015) <sup>[[#fn:r231|231]]</sup> , the assumption of a linear scaling of impacts with GMST used in many studies (Lewis et al., 2017; King et al., 2018b) <sup>[[#fn:r232|232]]</sup> , and in impact models (e.g., Asseng et al., 2013) <sup>[[#fn:r233|233]]</sup> . The evolution of climate change also affects uncertainty with respect to impacts. For example, the impacts of overshooting 1.5°C and stabilization at a later stage compared to stabilization at 1.5°C without overshoot may differ in magnitude (Schleussner et al., 2016) <sup>[[#fn:r234|234]]</sup> . AR5 (IPCC, 2013b) <sup>[[#fn:r235|235]]</sup> and World Bank (2013) <sup>[[#fn:r236|236]]</sup> underscored the non-linearity of risks and impacts as temperature rises from 2°C to 4°C of warming, particularly in relation to water availability, heat extremes, bleaching of coral reefs, and more. Recent studies (Schleussner et al., 2016; James et al., 2017; Barcikowska et al., 2018; King et al., 2018a) <sup>[[#fn:r237|237]]</sup> assess the impacts of 1.5°C versus 2°C warming, with the same message of non-linearity. The resilience of ecosystems, meaning their ability either to resist change or to recover after a disturbance, may change, and often decline, in a non-linear way. An example are reef ecosystems, with some studies suggesting that reefs will change, rather than disappear entirely, and with particular species showing greater tolerance to coral bleaching than others (Pörtner et al., 2014) <sup>[[#fn:r238|238]]</sup> . A key issue is therefore whether ecosystems such as coral reefs survive an overshoot scenario, and to what extent they would be able to recover after stabilization at 1.5°C or higher levels of warming (see Box 3.4). <span id="strengthening-the-global-response"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SR15/Chapter-1
(section)
Add languages
Add topic