Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-6
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 6.4.3.4 System Benefits of Flexibility Technologies and Advanced Control Systems ==== <div id="h3-14-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> New sources of flexibility and advanced control systems provide a significant opportunity to reduce low-carbon energy system costs by enhancing operating efficiency and reducing energy infrastructure and low-carbon generation investments, while continuing to meet security requirements ( ''high confidence'' ). In the USA, for example, one study found that flexibility in buildings alone could reduce US CO 2 emissions by 80 Mt yr β1 and save USD18 billion yr β1 in electricity system costs by 2030 ( [[#Satchwell--2021|Satchwell et al. 2021]] ). Key means for creating savings are associated with the following: β’ '''Efficient energy system operation.''' Flexibility technologies such as storage, demand-side response, interconnection, and cross-system control will enable more efficient, real-time demand and supply balancing. This balancing has historically been provided by conventional fossil-fuel generation ( [[#Nuytten--2013|Nuytten et al. 2013]] ). '''β’''' '''Savings in investment in low-carbon/renewable generation capacity.''' System flexibility sources can absorb or export surplus electricity, thus reducing or avoiding energy curtailment and reducing the need for firm low-carbon capacity such as nuclear and fossil-fuel plants with CCS ( [[#Newbery--2013|Newbery et al. 2013]] ; [[#Solomon--2019|Solomon et al. 2019]] ). For example, one study found that flexibility technologies and advanced control systems could reduce the need for nuclear power by 14 GW and offshore wind by 20 GW in the UKβs low-carbon transition ( [[#Strbac--2015b|Strbac et al. 2015b]] ). '''β’''' '''Reduced need for backup capacity.''' System flexibility can reduce energy demand peaks, reducing the required generation capacity to maintain the security of supply, producing significant savings in generation investments ( [[#Strbac--2020|Strbac et al. 2020]] ). β’ '''Deferral or avoidance of electricity network reinforcement/addition.''' Flexibility technologies supported by advanced control systems can provide significant savings in investment in electricity network reinforcement that might emerge from increased demand, for example, driven by electrification of transport and heat sectors. Historical network planning and operation standards are being revised considering alternative flexibility technologies, which would further support cost-effective integration of decarbonised transport and heat sectors ( [[#Strbac--2020|Strbac et al. 2020]] ). <div id="6.4.4" class="h2-container"></div> <span id="energy-storage-for-low-carbon-grids"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-6
(section)
Add languages
Add topic