Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-4
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 4.4.1.2 Projected Changes in Evapotranspiration ==== <div id="h3-5-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> AR5 ( [[#Collins--2013)|Collins et al., 2013)]] found that the CMIP5 model projections of ET increases or decreases followed the same pattern over land as precipitation projections, with additional impacts of reduced transpiration due to plant stomatal closure in response to rising CO 2 concentrations. AR6 WGI ( [[#Douville--2021|Douville et al., 2021]] ) assessed that it is ''very likely'' that ET will increase over land, with regional exceptions in drying areas. In most CMIP5 and CMIP6 models, projected ET changes are driven not just by meteorological conditions and soil moisture but also by plant physiological responses to elevated CO 2 , which themselves influence meteorology and soil moisture through surface fluxes ( [[#Halladay--2017|Halladay and Good, 2017]] ; [[#Lemordant--2019|Lemordant and Gentine, 2019]] ). Elevated CO 2 causes stomatal closure which decreases ET, but also increases leaf area index (LAI) which in turn increases ET, but these do not necessarily compensate ( [[#Skinner--2017|Skinner et al., 2017]] ). Higher LAI increases transpiration, depleting soil moisture but increasing shading, thus reducing soil evaporation ( [[#Skinner--2017|Skinner et al., 2017]] ), but LAI may not increase in areas where it is already high ( [[#Lemordant--2018|Lemordant et al., 2018]] ). Projected ET decreases from physiological effects alone are widespread but greatest in tropical forests ( [[#Swann--2016|Swann et al., 2016]] ; [[#Kooperman--2018|Kooperman et al., 2018]] ). Future changes in regional ET are therefore highly uncertain. The CMIP6 multi-model ensemble projects changes in ET varying both in magnitude and sign across the ensemble members (Figure 4.14). At 4°C global warming, the ensemble median projection shows increased ET of approximately 25% in mid/high latitudes but decreases of up to 10% across most of tropical South America, southern Africa and Australia. These CMIP6 ensemble projections resemble ET changes projected by the CMIP5 ensemble, except over central Africa and Southeast Asia ( [[#Berg--2019|Berg and Sheffield, 2019]] ). However, the ensemble ranges are wide and include both increases and decreases in projected ET in many locations, with mid-latitude ET increases being up to approximately 50% and ET decreases in southern Africa being up to approximately 30%. Projected changes are proportionally smaller at lower levels of global warming, while patterns of change remain similar. <div id="_idContainer059" class="Figure"></div> [[File:25173552ec9590928aaa2881f38ef4f1 IPCC_AR6_WGII_Figure_4_014.png]] '''Figure 4.14 |''' '''Projected percentage changes in annual mean ET at global warming levels (GWLs) of 4°C (top), 2°C (middle) and 1''' '''.''' '''5°C (bottom) for the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble of GCMs driven by SSP5-8.5 concentrations.''' The distribution of outcomes is shown at local scales with the 5th, 50th and 95th percentile ET changes in individual grid boxes. Note that these are uncertainties at the individual point and are not spatially coherent, that is, they do not represent plausible global patterns of change. Results for 1.5°C, 2°C and 4°C global warming are defined as 20-year means relative to 1850–1900 and use 40, 40 and 31 ensemble members, respectively, due to some members not reaching 4°C global warming. The relative importance of the physiological and radiative effects of CO 2 on future ET is a crucial knowledge gap, partly because many ESM land surface schemes still use representations of this process based on older experimental studies. Furthermore, large-scale experimental studies using free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) techniques to constrain the models have not yet been performed in certain critical ecosystems, such as tropical forests. Finally, uncertainties in equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) imply uncertainties in the CO 2 concentration accompanying any given level of warming (Betts and McNeall, 2018). In summary, the sign of projected ET change depends on region, but there is ''medium confidence'' that ET will increase in the global mean and mid/high latitudes and decrease in northern South America and southern Africa. In addition, the impacts of rising CO 2 concentrations on plant stomata and leaf area play a role in model projections of ET change ( ''high confidence'' ), but there is ''low confidence'' in their overall contribution to global ET change. <div id="4.4.1.3" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="projected-changes-in-soil-moisture"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-4
(section)
Add languages
Add topic