Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-17
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 17.4.1.1 Social Movements and Education ==== <div id="h3-11-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Sustainable development and deep decarbonisation will involve people and communities being connected locally through various means – including globally via the internet and digital technologies ( [[#Bradbury--2015|Bradbury 2015]] ; [[#Scharmer--2018|Scharmer 2018]] ; Scharmer, C, Kaufer 2015) – in ways that form social fields that allow sustainability to unfold ( [[#Gillard--2016|Gillard et al. 2016]] ), and that prompt other shifts in thinking and behaviour that are consistent with the 1.5°C goal ( [[#O’Brien--2018|O’Brien 2018]] ; [[#Veciana--2018|Veciana and Ottmar 2018]] ). Indeed, social movements serve to develop collective identities, foster collective learning and accelerate collective action ranging from energy justice ( [[#Campos--2020|Campos and Marín-González 2020]] ) ( [[#17.4.5|Section 17.4.5]] ) to restricting fossil fuel extraction and supply ( [[#Piggot--2018|Piggot 2018]] ). This does not apply only to adults: as seen in the ‘Fridays for Future’ marches, the young are also involving themselves politically ( [[#Peterson--2019|Peterson et al. 2019]] ). Many initiatives have started with these marches, including ‘science for future’ and new forms of sustainability science ( [[#Shrivastava--2020|Shrivastava et al. 2020]] ). It was Theory-U ( [[#Scharmer--2018|Scharmer 2018]] ), building on the work of scholars such as Schein, Lewin and Senge) that inspired a so-called ‘massive open online course’ (MOOC) jointly initiated by the Bhutan Happiness Institute and German Technical Assistance (GIZ) in 2015, since when it has been developed further and adapted to transform business, society and self as one example of how social movements can go together with science and education. It brings together people from different professions, cultures and continents in shared discussions and practices of sustainability. It also included marginalised communities and is shifting towards more sustainable lifestyles in all sectors ( [[#Nikas--2020|Nikas et al. 2020]] ), including climate action. Moreover, approaches like the ‘Art of Hosting’ ( [[#Sandfort--2015|Sandfort and Quick 2015]] ) and qualitative research methods such as storytelling and first-person research, as well as second-person inquiries, for example (Scharmer, C, Kaufer 2015; [[#Trullen--2004|Trullen and Torbert 2004]] ; Varela 1999), have been employed to bridge differences in cultures and sciences, as well as to forge connections between those working on climate change and sustainable development. Likewise, experiential tools, simulations and role-playing games have been shown to increase knowledge of the causes and consequences of climate change, the sense of urgency around action and the desire to pursue further learning ( [[#Ahamer--2013|Ahamer 2013]] ; [[#Eisenack--2013|Eisenack and Reckien 2013]] ; [[#Hallinger--2020|Hallinger et al. 2020]] ; [[#Rooney-Varga--2020|Rooney-Varga et al. 2020]] ). The results from these research communities reveal how experiential learning takes place and how it encourages bonding between people, society and nature. This can be achieved by going jointly and consciously into nature ( [[#Gioacchino--2019|Gioacchino 2019]] ), by creating spaces for intensive-dialogue sessions with colleagues ( [[#Goldman-Schuyler--2017|Goldman-Schuyler et al. 2017]] ) and forming, for example, a very practical u.lab hub, which involves following the MIT-u.lab course with a local community and is accompanied scientifically ( [[#Pomeroy--2018|Pomeroy and Oliver 2018]] ). Others have pointed to social networks such as the ‘transition initiative’ ( [[#Hopkins--2010|Hopkins 2010]] ), eco-village networks ( [[#Barani--2018|Barani et al. 2018]] ), civil-society movements ( [[#Seyfang--2007|Seyfang and Smith 2007]] ) and intentional communities ( [[#Grinde--2018|Grinde et al. 2018]] ; [[#Veciana--2018|Veciana and Ottmar 2018]] ) as ways of generating the shared understandings that are central to inner and outer transitions, as well as the broader development of social movements. In some cases, these networks build on principles like permaculture to encourage people to ‘observe and interact’, ‘produce no waste’ and ‘design from patterns to details’, not only in agriculture and gardening, but also in sustainable businesses and technologies to reduce CO 2 emissions (Ferguson and Lovell 2014; [[#Lessem--2018|Lessem 2018]] ). A related line of inquiry involves education for sustainable development (ESD). This builds on the UNESCO programme, ‘ESD for 2030’, and involves core values like peace culture, valuing cultural diversity and living global citizenship. One of the core insights from research on ESC is lifelong education continuing outside the classroom, a lifelong learning process that involves sustained actions by all ages and social segments ( [[#Hume--2015|Hume and Barry 2015]] ) and achieving collaboration ( [[#Munger--2012|Munger and Riemer 2012]] ). Some authors have pointed to good levels of communication either directly or through the internet as the key to facilitating this learning ( [[#Sandfort--2015|Sandfort and Quick 2015]] ). Others have noted that transformative learning – that is, deepening the learning process – is critical because it helps to induce both shared awareness and collective actions ( [[#Brundiers--2010|Brundiers et al. 2010]] ; [[#Singleton--2015|Singleton 2015]] ; [[#Wamsler--2018|Wamsler and Brink 2018]] ). A final area of work points to the importance of moving toward the knowledge production that underpins awareness-raising ( [[#Pelling--2015|Pelling et al. 2015]] ). The accumulation of applied knowledge is leading increasingly to the co-design of participatory research with local stakeholders who are investigating and transforming their own situations in line with climate action and sustainable development ( [[#Wiek--2012|Wiek et al. 2012]] ; [[#Abson--2017|Abson et al. 2017]] ; [[#Fazey--2018|Fazey et al. 2018]] ). <div id="17.4.1.2" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="habits-values-and-awareness"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-17
(section)
Add languages
Add topic