Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-13
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 13.3.3 Knowledge Gaps === <div id="h2-10-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> Despite growing evidence of climate-change impacts and risks, including attributed changes to terrestrial ecosystems ( [[#13.10.1|Section 13.10.1]] ), this information is geographically not equally distributed, leaving clear gaps for some processes or regions ( ''high confidence'' ). For processes such as wildfire, the Fire Weather index ( [[#13.3.1.3|Section 13.3.1.3]] ) suggests increasing risk of fires in Europe, but robust projections on incidents and magnitudes of wildfire and their impacts on ecosystems and other sectors is currently limited, particularly for NEU, EEU and WCE ( ''high confidence'' ). Many studies consider only individual climate drivers, though new research shows strong interactions between hazards such as warming and drought ( [[#13.3.1|Section 13.3.1]] ), as well as non-climatic drivers (Chapter 2). This creates uncertainty about the emergence of extinctions and the magnitudes of impacts for European ecosystems and the services they provide ( ''high confidence'' ), such as pollination on food production. RCP-SSP combinations to assess risks are only just emerging ( [[#Harrison--2019|Harrison et al., 2019]] ). Assessments of the long-term effectiveness of adaptation actions are missing, due to the time lag in determining the effectiveness of an action and attributing risk reduction ( [[#Morecroft--2019|Morecroft et al., 2019]] ). For example, many landscape restoration actions have been discussed, but it is unclear which would bring the greatest benefits and which species should be used for the restoration ( [[#Ockendon--2018|Ockendon et al., 2018]] ). Furthermore, adaptation actions will depend on local implementation and benefit from being assessed using cultural and Indigenous knowledge where applicable, but this is hardly studied ( ''medium confidence'' ). <div id="13.4" class="h1-container"></div> <span id="ocean-and-coastal-ecosystems-and-their-services"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-13
(section)
Add languages
Add topic