Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-6
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 6.3.3 Potential of the integrated response options for addressing desertification === <div id="section-6-3-3-potential-of-the-integrated-response-options-for-addressing-desertification-block-1"></div> In this section, the impacts of integrated response options on desertification are assessed. <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management"></div> <span id="integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-3"></span> ==== 6.3.3.1 Integrated response options based on land management ==== <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-1"></div> In this section, the impacts on desertification of integrated response options based on land management are assessed. ''Integrated response options based on land management in agriculture'' Burney et al. (2010) estimated that an additional global cropland area of 11.11β15.14 Mkm <sup>2</sup> would have been needed if productivity had not increased between 1961 and 2000. Given that agricultural expansion is a main driver of desertification (FAO and ITPS 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r492|492]]</sup> ), increased food productivity could have prevented up to 11.11β15.14 Mkm <sup>2</sup> from exploitation and desertification (Table 6.10). Improved cropland, livestock and grazing land management are strategic options aimed at prevention of desertification, and may include crop and animal selection, optimised stocking rates, changed tillage and/or cover crops, to land-use shifting from cropland to rangeland, in general targeting increases in ground cover by vegetation, and protection against wind erosion (Schwilch et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r493|493]]</sup> ; Bestelmeyer et al. 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r494|494]]</sup> ). Considering the widespread distribution of deserts and desertified lands globally, more than 10 Mkm <sup>2</sup> could benefit from improved management techniques. Agroforestry can help stabilise soils to prevent desertification (Section 6.3.2.1), so given that there is around 10 Mkm <sup>2</sup> of land with more than 10% tree cover (Garrity 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r495|495]]</sup> ), agroforestry could benefit up to 10 Mkm <sup>2</sup> of land. Agricultural diversification to prevent desertification may include the use of crops with manures, legumes, fodder legumes and cover crops combined with conservation tillage systems (Schwilch et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r496|496]]</sup> ). These practices can be considered to be part of improved crop management options (see above) and aim at increasing ground coverage by vegetation and controlling wind erosion losses. Since shifting from grassland to the annual cultivation of crops increases erosion and soil loss, there are significant benefits for desertification control, by stabilising soils in arid areas (Chapter 3). Cropland expansion during 1985 to 2005 was 359,000 km2, or 17,400 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> (Foley et al. 2011). Not all of this expansion will be from grasslands or in desertified areas, but this value sets the maximum contribution of prevention of conversion of grasslands to croplands, a small global benefit for desertification control (Table 6.10). Integrated water management strategies such as water-use efficiency and irrigation, improve soil health through increase in soil organic matter content, thereby delivering benefits for prevention or reversal of desertification (Baumhardt et al. 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1259|1259]]</sup> ; Datta et al. 2000 <sup>[[#fn:r497|497]]</sup> ; Evans and Sadler 2008 <sup>[[#fn:r498|498]]</sup> ; He et al. 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r499|499]]</sup> ) (Chapter 3). Climate change will amplify existing stress on water availability and on agricultural systems, particularly in semi-arid environments (IPCC AR5 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r500|500]]</sup> ) (Chapter 3). In 2011, semi-arid ecosystems in the southern hemisphere contributed 51% of the global net carbon sink (Poulter et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r501|501]]</sup> ). These results suggest that arid ecosystems could be an important global carbon sink, depending on soil water availability. Table 6.29 summarises the impacts on desertification of agricultural options, with confidence estimates based on the thresholds outlined in Table 6.53 in Section 6.3.6, and indicative (not exhaustive) references upon which the evidence in based. <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-2"></div> <span id="table-6.29"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- TABLE IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Table 6.29''' <span id="effects-on-desertification-of-response-options-in-agriculture."></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Effects on desertification of response options in agriculture.''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:a38dc2aad2c6d3cd2a6228ac7b6d8504 table-6.29.png]] <!-- END IMG --> <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-3"></div> ''Integrated response options based on land management in forestry'' Forests are important to help to stabilise land and regulate water and microclimate (Locatelli et al. 2015b <sup>[[#fn:r1260|1260]]</sup> ). Based on the extent of dry forest at risk of desertification (NΓΊΓ±ez et al. 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r1261|1261]]</sup> ; Bastin et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1262|1262]]</sup> ), the estimated global potential effect for avoided desertification is large for both forest management and for reduced deforestation and forest degradation when cumulated for at least 20 years (Table 6.30). The uncertainty of these global estimates is high. More robust qualitative and some quantitative estimates are available at regional level. For example, it has been simulated that human activity (i.e., land management) contributed to 26% of the total land reverted from desertification in Northern China between 1981 and 2010 (Xu et al. 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1263|1263]]</sup> ). In Thailand, it was found that the desertification risk is reduced when the land use is changed from bare lands to agricultural lands and forests, and from non-forests to forests; conversely, the desertification risk increases when converting forests and denuded forests to bare lands (Wijitkosum 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1264|1264]]</sup> ). Afforestation, reforestation and forest restoration are land management response options that are used to prevent desertification. Forests tend to maintain water and soil quality by reducing runoff and trapping sediments and nutrients (Medugu et al. 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r505|505]]</sup> ; Salvati et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r506|506]]</sup> ), but planting of non-native species in semi-arid regions can deplete soil water resources if they have high evapotranspiration rates (Zeng et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r507|507]]</sup> ; Yang et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r508|508]]</sup> ). Afforestation and reforestation programmes can be deployed over large areas of the Earth, so can create synergies in areas prone to desertification. Global estimates of land potentially available for afforestation are up to 25.8 Mkm <sup>2</sup> by the end of the century, depending on a variety of assumptions on socio- economic developments and climate policies (Griscom et al. 2017; Kreidenweis et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r509|509]]</sup> ; Popp et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r510|510]]</sup> ). The higher end of this range is achieved under the assumption of a globally uniform reward for carbon uptake in the terrestrial biosphere, and it is halved by considering tropical and subtropical areas only to minimise albedo feedbacks (Kreidenweis et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r511|511]]</sup> ). When safeguards are introduced (e.g., excluding existing cropland for food security, boreal areas, etc.), the area available declines to about 6.8 Mkm <sup>2</sup> (95% confidence interval of 2.3 and 11.25 Mkm <sup>2</sup> ), of which about 4.72 Mkm <sup>2</sup> is in the tropics and 2.06 Mkm <sup>2</sup> is in temperate regions (Griscom et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r512|512]]</sup> ) (Table 6.30). Table 6.30 summarises the impacts on desertification of forestry options, with confidence estimates based on the thresholds outlined in Table 6.53 in Section 6.3.6, and indicative (not exhaustive) references upon which the evidence in based. <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-4"></div> <span id="table-6.30"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- TABLE IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Table 6.30''' <span id="effects-on-desertification-of-response-options-in-forests."></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Effects on desertification of response options in forests.''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:e5cac25d7ea497673c6cf0b1c27dff1c table-6.30.png]] <!-- END IMG --> <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-5"></div> Integrated response options based on land management of soils With more than 2.7 billion people affected globally by desertification (IPBES 2018) <sup>[[#fn:r513|513]]</sup> , practices to increase soil organic carbon content are proposed as actions to address desertification, and could be applied to an estimated 11.37 Mkm <sup>2</sup> of desertified soils (Lal 2001 <sup>[[#fn:r514|514]]</sup> ) (Table 6.31). Control of soil erosion could have large benefits for desertification control. Using figures from FAO et al. (2015) <sup>[[#fn:r515|515]]</sup> , IPBES (2018) <sup>[[#fn:r1270|1270]]</sup> estimated that land losses due to erosion to 2050 are equivalent to 1.5 Mkm2 of land from crop production, or 45,000 km <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> (Foley et al. 2011) so soil erosion control could benefit up to 1.50 Mkm2 of land in the coming decades. Lal (2001) <sup>[[#fn:r517|517]]</sup> estimated that desertification control (using soil erosion control as one intervention) could benefit 11.37 Mkm <sup>2</sup> of desertified land globally (Table 6.10). Oldeman et al. (1991) estimated that the global extent soil affected by salinisation is 0.77 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> ,which sets the upper limit on the area that could benefit from measures to address soil salinisation (Table 6.31). In degraded arid grasslands, shrublands and rangelands, desertification can be reversed by alleviation of soil compaction through installation of enclosures and removal of domestic livestock (Allington et al. 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r518|518]]</sup> ), but there are no global estimates of potential (Table 6.31). Biochar could potentially deliver benefits in efforts to address desertification though improving water-holding capacity (Woolf et al. 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r519|519]]</sup> ; Sohi 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r520|520]]</sup> ), but the global effect is not quantified. Table 6.31 summarises the impacts on desertification of soil-based options, with confidence estimates based on the thresholds outlined in Table 6.53 in Section 6.3.6, and indicative (not exhaustive) references upon which the evidence in based. <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-6"></div> <span id="table-6.31"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- TABLE IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Table 6.31''' <span id="effects-on-desertification-of-land-management-of-soils."></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Effects on desertification of land management of soils.''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:78d2a145927ec6536b631d7d7061922e table-6.31.png]] <!-- END IMG --> <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-7"></div> Integrated response options based on land management across all/other ecosystems For fire management, Arora and Melton (2018) <sup>[[#fn:r521|521]]</sup> estimated, using models and GFED4.1s0 data, that burned area over the 1997β2014 period was 4.834β4.855 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> . Randerson et al. (2012) <sup>[[#fn:r522|522]]</sup> estimated small fires increased total burned area globally by 35% from 3.45 to 4.64 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> during the period 2001β2010. Tansey et al. (2004) <sup>[[#fn:r523|523]]</sup> estimated that over 3.5 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> of burned areas were detected in the year 2000 (Table 6.32). Although slope and slope aspect are predictive factors of desertification occurrence, the factors with the greatest influence are land cover factors, such as normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) and rangeland classes (Djeddaoui et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r524|524]]</sup> ). Therefore, prevention of landslides and natural hazards exert indirect influence on the occurrence of desertification. The global extent of chemical soil degradation (salinisation, pollution and acidification) is about 1.03 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> (Oldeman et al. 1991 <sup>[[#fn:r525|525]]</sup> ), giving the maximum extent of land that could benefit from the management of pollution and acidification. There are no global data on the impacts of management of invasive species/encroachment on desertification, though the impact is presumed to be positive. There are no studies examining the potential role of restoration and avoided conversion of coastal wetlands on desertification. There are no impacts of peatland restoration for prevention of desertification, as peatlands occur in wet areas and deserts in arid areas, so they are not connected. For management of pollution, including acidification, Oldeman et al. (1991) estimated the global extent of chemical soil degradation, with 0.77 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> affected by salinisation, 0.21 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> affected by pollution, and 0.06 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> affected by acidification (total: 1.03 Mkm <sup>2</sup> yr <sup>β1</sup> ), so this is the area that could potentially benefit from pollution management measures. Biodiversity conservation measures can interact with desertification, but the literature contains no global estimates of potential. Table 6.32 summarises the impacts on desertification of options on all/other ecosystems, with confidence estimates based on the thresholds outlined in Table 6.53 in Section 6.3.6, and indicative (not exhaustive) references upon which the evidence in based. <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-8"></div> <span id="table-6.32"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- TABLE IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Table 6.32''' <span id="effects-on-desertification-of-response-options-on-allother-ecosystems."></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Effects on desertification of response options on all/other ecosystems.''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:230e6fb72e32c58aae6448e287e45a36 table-6.32.png]] <!-- END IMG --> <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-9"></div> ''Integrated response options based on land management specifically for carbon dioxide removal (CDR)'' While spreading of crushed minerals onto land as part of enhanced weathering may provide soil/plant nutrients in nutrient-depleted soils (Beerling et al. 2018), there is no literature reporting on the potential global impacts of this in addressing desertification. Large-scale production of bioenergy can require significant amounts of land (Smith et al. 2016a <sup>[[#fn:r527|527]]</sup> ; Clarke et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r528|528]]</sup> ; Popp et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r529|529]]</sup> ), with as much as 15 Mkm <sup>2</sup> in 2100 in 2Β°C scenarios (Popp et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r530|530]]</sup> ), increasing pressures for desertification (Table 6.33). Table 6.33 summarises the impacts on desertification of options specifically for CDR, with confidence estimates based on the thresholds outlined in Table 6.53 in Section 6.3.6, and indicative (not exhaustive) references upon which the evidence in based. <div id="section-6-3-3-1-integrated-response-options-based-on-land-management-block-10"></div> <span id="table-6.33"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- TABLE IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Table 6.33''' <span id="effects-on-desertification-of-response-options-specifically-for-cdr."></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Effects on desertification of response options specifically for CDR.''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:19b9e5baaaccdc6be3ef4823f0233e88 table-6.33.png]] <!-- END IMG --> <div id="section-6-3-3-2-integrated-response-options-based-on-value-chain-management"></div> <span id="integrated-response-options-based-on-value-chain-management-3"></span> ==== 6.3.3.2 Integrated response options based on value chain management ==== <div id="section-6-3-3-2-integrated-response-options-based-on-value-chain-management-block-1"></div> In this section, the impacts on desertification of integrated response options based on value chain management are assessed. ''Integrated response options based on value chain management through demand management'' Dietary change and waste reduction both result in decreased cropland and pasture extent (BajΕΎelj et al. 2014a <sup>[[#fn:r531|531]]</sup> ; Stehfest et al. 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r532|532]]</sup> ; Tilman and Clark 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r533|533]]</sup> ), reducing the pressure for desertification (Table 6.34). Reduced post-harvest losses could spare 1.98 Mkm2 of cropland globally (Kummu et al. 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r534|534]]</sup> ). Not all of this land could be subject to desertification pressure, so this represents the maximum area that could be relieved from desertification pressure by reduction of post- harvest losses. No studies were found linking material substitution to desertification. Table 6.34 summarises the impacts on desertification of demand management options, with confidence estimates based on the thresholds outlined in Table 6.53 in Section 6.3.6, and indicative (not exhaustive) references upon which the evidence in based. <div id="section-6-3-3-2-integrated-response-options-based-on-value-chain-management-block-2"></div> <span id="table-6.34"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- TABLE IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Table 6.34''' <span id="effects-on-desertification-of-response-options-based-on-demand-management."></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Effects on desertification of response options based on demand management.''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:10785907a8ee8f72c471adc2b802b7f7 table-6.34.png]] <!-- END IMG --> <div id="section-6-3-3-2-integrated-response-options-based-on-value-chain-management-block-3"></div> ''Integrated response options based on value chain management through supply management'' There are no global estimates of the impact on desertification of sustainable sourcing, management of supply chains, enhanced urban food systems, improved food processing, or improved energy use in agriculture. Table 6.35 summarises the impacts on desertification of supply management options, with confidence estimates based on the thresholds outlined in Table 6.53 in Section 6.3.6, and indicative (not exhaustive) references upon which the evidence in based. <div id="section-6-3-3-2-integrated-response-options-based-on-value-chain-management-block-4"></div> <span id="table-6.35"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- TABLE IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Table 6.35''' <span id="effects-on-desertification-of-response-options-based-on-supply-management."></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Effects on desertification of response options based on supply management.''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:0e062d581ce2b222eea5da7795af63fb table-6.35.png]] <!-- END IMG --> <div id="section-6-3-3-3-integrated-response-options-based-on-risk-management"></div> <span id="integrated-response-options-based-on-risk-management-3"></span> ==== 6.3.3.3 Integrated response options based on risk management ==== <div id="section-6-3-3-3-integrated-response-options-based-on-risk-management-block-1"></div> In this section, the impacts on desertification of integrated response options based on risk management are assessed. There are regional case studies of urban sprawl contributing to desertification in Mediterranean climates in particular (Barbero-Sierra et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r535|535]]</sup> ; Stellmes et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r536|536]]</sup> ), but no global figures. Diversification may deliver some benefits for addressing desertification when it involves greater use of tree crops that may reduce the need for tillage (Antwi-Agyei et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r537|537]]</sup> ). Many anti-desertification programmes call for diversification (Stringer et al. 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r538|538]]</sup> ), but there is little evidence on how many households had done so (Herrmann and Hutchinson 2005 <sup>[[#fn:r539|539]]</sup> ). There are no numbers for global impacts. The literature is unclear on whether the use of local seeds has any relationship to desertification, although some local seeds are more likely to adapt to arid climates and less likely to degrade land than commercially introduced varieties (Mousseau 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r540|540]]</sup> ). Some anti- desertification programmes have also shown more success using local seed varieties (Bassoum and Ghiggi 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r541|541]]</sup> ; Nunes et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r542|542]]</sup> ). Some disaster risk management approaches can have impacts on reducing desertification, like the Global Drought Early Warning System (GDEWS) (currently in development), which will monitor precipitation, soil moisture, evapotranspiration, river flows, groundwater, agricultural productivity and natural ecosystem health. It may have some potential co-benefits to reduce desertification (Pozzi et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r543|543]]</sup> ). However, there are no figures yet for how much land area will be covered by such early warning systems. Risk-sharing instruments, such as pooling labour or credit, could help communities invest in anti-desertification actions, but evidence is missing. Commercial crop insurance is likely to deliver no co-benefits for prevention and reversal of desertification, as evidence suggests that subsidised insurance, in particular, can increase crop production in marginal lands. Crop insurance could have been responsible for shifting up to 0.9% of rangelands to cropland in the Upper Midwest of the USA (Claassen et al. 2011a <sup>[[#fn:r544|544]]</sup> ). Table 6.36 summarises the impact on desertification for options based on risk management, with confidence estimates based on the thresholds outlined in Table 6.53 in Section 6.3.6, and indicative (not exhaustive) references upon which the evidence in based. <div id="section-6-3-3-3-integrated-response-options-based-on-risk-management-block-2"></div> <span id="table-6.36"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- TABLE IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Table 6.36''' <span id="effects-on-desertification-of-response-options-based-on-risk-management."></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Effects on desertification of response options based on risk management.''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:cc74753edfdb369943112d22c14bf9c0 table-6.36.png]] <!-- END IMG --> <span id="potential-of-the-integrated-response-options-for-addressing-land-degradation"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-6
(section)
Add languages
Add topic