Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-10
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 10.2.4 Outlook for Improving Observational Data for Regional Climates === <div id="h2-14-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> An encouraging development for understanding climate variations over the past 250 years or so at the global and regional scale lies in the field of data rescue, in which hitherto hidden archives of meteorological data are brought to the forefront (Sections 1.5.1.1 and 2.5). Surface observations from data rescue projects may then be assimilated to derive long-term high-resolution gridded surface regional reanalysis ( [[#Devers--2020|Devers et al., 2020]] ). Global extended reanalyses such as 20CR ( [[#Compo--2011|Compo et al., 2011]] ), ERA-20C ( [[#Poli--2016a|Poli et al., 2016a]] , b) or CERA-20C ( [[#Laloyaux--2018|Laloyaux et al., 2018]] ) may be further downscaled to quantify the variability of past climate at the regional scale ( [[#Caillouet--2016|Caillouet et al., 2016]] , 2019). One of the main scientific challenges related to high-resolution regional climate modelling is dealing with the representation of fine-scale processes (e.g., [[#Yano--2018|Yano et al., 2018]] ) in observational datasets. Additionally, reliable observation networks following WMO standards have a very sparse geographical representation. Hence, regional climate models have started to use high-resolution data combined with crowdsourced observations ( [[#Zheng--2018|Zheng et al., 2018]] ). Recent efforts have led to the production of homogeneously processed long-term datasets for regional climate model evaluation ( [[#Goudenhoofdt--2016|Goudenhoofdt and Delobbe, 2016]] ; [[#Humphrey--2017|Humphrey et al., 2017]] ; [[#Yang--2019|Yang and Ng, 2019]] ). While they are far less reliable and accurate than professional observations, crowdsourced data are abundantly available and can give spatial representations at very high resolution. This technological trend could prove very useful ( ''high confidence'' ), and the regional climate community is making efforts to understand the extent to which these data sources can be exploited, at least as a complement to traditional datasets ( [[#Overeem--2013|Overeem et al., 2013]] ; [[#Meier--2017|Meier et al., 2017]] ; [[#Uijlenhoet--2018|Uijlenhoet et al., 2018]] ; [[#de%20Vos--2019|de Vos et al., 2019]] ; [[#Langendijk--2019b|Langendijk et al., 2019b]] ). <div id="10.3" class="h1-container"></div> <span id="using-models-for-constructing-regional-climate-information"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-10
(section)
Add languages
Add topic