Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-3
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 3.3.3.4 Sudden Stratospheric Warming Activity ==== <div id="h3-12-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) are stratospheric weather events associated with anomalously high temperatures at high latitudes persisting from days to weeks. [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-2#2.3.1.4.5|Section 2.3.1.4.5]] discusses the definition and observational aspects of SSWs. SSWs are often associated with anomalous weather conditions, for example, winter cold spells, in the lower atmosphere (e.g., [[#Butler--2015|Butler et al., 2015]] ; [[#Baldwin--2021|Baldwin et al., 2021]] ). [[#Seviour--2016|Seviour et al. (2016)]] found that stratosphere-resolving CMIP5 models, on average, reproduce the observed frequency of vortex splits (one form of SSWs) but with a wide range of model-specific biases. Models that produce a better mean state of the polar vortex also tend to produce a more realistic SSW frequency ( [[#Seviour--2016|Seviour et al., 2016]] ). The mean sea level pressure anomalies occurring in CMIP5 model simulations when an SSW is underway, however, differ substantially from those in reanalyses ( [[#Seviour--2016|Seviour et al., 2016]] ). Unlike stratosphere-resolving models, models with limited stratospheric resolution, which make up more than half of the CMIP5 ensemble, underestimate the frequency of SSWs ( [[#Osprey--2013|Osprey et al., 2013]] ; J. [[#Kim--2017|]] [[#Kim--2017|Kim et al., 2017]] ). [[#Taguchi--2017|Taguchi (2017)]] found a general underestimation in CMIP5 models of the frequency of ‘major’ SSWs (which are associated with a break-up of the polar vortex), an aspect of an under-representation in those models of dynamical variability in the stratosphere. [[#Wu--2020|Wu and Reichler (2020)]] found that finer vertical resolution in the stratosphere and a model top above the stratopause tend to be associated with a more realistic SSW frequency in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Some studies find an increase in the frequency of SSWs under increasing greenhouse gases (e.g., [[#Schimanke--2013|Schimanke et al., 2013]] ; [[#Young--2013|Young et al., 2013]] ; J. [[#Kim--2017|]] [[#Kim--2017|Kim et al., 2017]] ). However, this behaviour is not robust across ensembles of chemistry-climate models ( [[#Mitchell--2012|Mitchell et al., 2012]] ; [[#Ayarzagüena--2018|Ayarzagüena et al., 2018]] ; [[#Rao--2021|Rao and Garfinkel, 2021]] ). There is an absence of studies specifically focusing on simulated trends in SSWs during recent decades, and the short record and substantial decadal variability yields ''low confidence'' in any observed trends in the occurrence of SSW events in the Northern Hemisphere winter ( [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-2#2.3.1.4.5|Section 2.3.1.4.5]] ). Such an absence of a trend and large variability would also be consistent with a recent reconstruction of SSWs extending back to 1850, based on sea level pressure observations ( [[#Domeisen--2019|Domeisen, 2019]] ), although this time series has limitations as it is not based on direct observations of SSWs. In summary, an anthropogenic influence on the frequency or other aspects of SSWs has not yet been robustly detected. There is ''low confidence'' in the ability of models to simulate any such trends over the historical period because of large natural interannual variability and also due to substantial common biases in the simulated mean state affecting the simulated frequency of SSWs. <div id="3.4" class="h1-container"></div> <span id="human-influence-on-the-cryosphere-1"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-3
(section)
Add languages
Add topic