Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-2
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 2.3.2.2.2 Changes in vulnerability ===== Considering the wide ranging social, economic, and institutional factors that enable communities to adequately prepare for, respond to and recover from climate change impacts (Cutter and Morath, 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r609|609]]</sup> ), there is ''limited evidence'' and ''high agreement'' that mountain communities, particularly within developing countries, are highly vulnerable to the adverse effects of enhanced cryosphere hazards. There are few studies that have systematically investigated the vulnerability of mountain communities to natural hazards (Carey et al., 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r610|610]]</sup> ). Coping capacities to withstand impacts from natural hazards in mountain communities are constrained due to a number of reasons. Fundamental weather and climate information is lacking to support both short-term early warning for imminent disasters, and long-term adaptation planning (Rohrer et al., 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r611|611]]</sup> ; Xenarios et al., 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r612|612]]</sup> ). Communities may be politically and socially marginalised (Marston, 2008 <sup>[[#fn:r613|613]]</sup> ). Incomes are typically lower and opportunities for livelihood diversification restricted (McDowell et al., 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r614|614]]</sup> ). Emergency responders can have difficulties accessing remote mountain valleys after disasters strike (Sati and Gahalaut, 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r615|615]]</sup> ). Cultural or social ties to the land can limit freedom of movement (Oliver-Smith, 1996 <sup>[[#fn:r615|615]]</sup> ). Conversely, there is evidence that some mountain communities exhibit enhanced levels of resilience, drawing on long-standing experience, and Indigenous knowledge and local knowledge (Cross-Chapter Box 4 in Chapter 1) gained over many centuries of living with extremes of climate and related disasters (Gardner and Dekens, 2006 <sup>[[#fn:r616|616]]</sup> ). In the absence of sufficient data, few studies have considered temporal trends in vulnerability (Huggel et al., 2015a <sup>[[#fn:r617|617]]</sup> ). <div id="section-2-3-2-2exposure-vulnerability-and-impacts-block-3"></div> <span id="impacts-on-livelihoods"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-2
(section)
Add languages
Add topic