Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-14
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 14.4.1.1 Bilateral Finance ==== <div id="h3-19-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> The Paris Agreement and the imperative for sustainable development reinforce the need to forge strong linkages between climate and development ( [[#Fay--2015|Fay et al. 2015]] ). This in turn has highlighted the urgent need for greater attention to the relationship between development assistance and finance, and climate change ( [[#Steele--2015|Steele 2015]] ). The UNFCCC website cites some 20 bilateral development agencies providing support to climate change programmes in developing countries ( [[#UNFCCC--2020a|UNFCCC 2020a]] ). These agencies provide a mix of development cooperation, policy advice and support and financing for climate change projects. Since the year 2000, the OECD Development Assistance Committee has been tracking trends in climate-related development finance and assistance. The amount of bilateral development finance with climate relevance has increased substantially since 2000 ( [[#OECD--2019a|OECD 2019a]] ). For 2019, it was reported to be USD28.8 billion in direct finance and USD2.6 billion through export credit agencies. Further, another USD34.1 billion of the climate finance provided through multilateral channels is attributable to the developed countries ( [[#OECD--2021|OECD 2021]] ). The OECD methodology has been critiqued as it uses Rio markers, the limitations of which could lead to erroneous reporting and assessment of finance provided as well as of the mitigation outcome ( [[#Michaelowa--2011b|Michaelowa and Michaelowa 2011b]] ; [[#Weikmans--2019|Weikmans and Roberts 2019]] ). This issue is to be addressed through the modalities, procedures and guidance under the Enhanced Transparency Framework of the Paris Agreement ( [[#14.3.2.4|Section 14.3.2.4]] ), through the mandate to the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) to develop common tabular formats for the reporting of information on, ''inter alia'' , financial support provided, mobilised and received ( [[#UNFCCC--2019k|UNFCCC 2019k]] ). Until then, the Biennial Assessment Report prepared by the Standing Committee on Finance provides the best available information on financial support. <div id="14.4.1.2" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="multilateral-finance"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-14
(section)
Add languages
Add topic