Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-5
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 5.4.4 Institutional Drivers === <div id="h2-21-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> The allocationof political power to incumbent actors and coalitions has contributed to lock-in of particular institutions, stabilising the interests of incumbents through networks that include policymakers, bureaucracies, advocacy groups and knowledge institutions ( ''high agreement, high evidence'' ). There is ''high evidence'' and ''high agreement'' that institutions are central in addressing climate change mitigation. Indeed, social provisioning contexts, including equity, democracy, public services and high quality infrastructure, are found to facilitate high levels of need satisfaction at lower energy use, whereas economic growth beyond moderate incomes and dependence on extractive industries inhibit it ( [[#Vogel--2021|Vogel et al. 2021]] ). They shape and interact with technological systems ( [[#Unruh--2000|Unruh 2000]] ; [[#Foxon--2004|Foxon et al. 2004]] ; [[#Seto--2014|Seto et al. 2014]] ) and represent rules, norms and conventions that organise and structure actions ( [[#Vatn--2015|Vatn 2015]] ) and help create new path dependency or strengthen existing path dependency ( [[#Mattioli--2020|Mattioli et al. 2020]] ) (see case studies in Boxes 5.5 to 5.8 and [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/chapter/chapter-5 Chapter 5] Supplementary Material I). These drive behaviour of actors through formal (e.g., laws, regulations, and standards) or informal (e.g., norms, habits, and customs) processes, and can create constraints on policy options ( [[#Breukers--2007|Breukers and]] [[#Wolsink--2007|Wolsink 2007]] ). For example, the car-dependent transport system is maintained by interlocking elements and institutions, consisting of (i) the automotive industry; (ii) the provision of car infrastructure; (iii) the political economy of urban sprawl; (iv) the provision of public transport; (v) cultures of car consumption ( [[#Mattioli--2020|Mattioli et al. 2020]] ). The behaviour of actors, their processes and implications on policy options and decisions are discussed further in [[#5.6|Section 5.6]] . <div id="box-5.8" class="h2-container box-container"></div> <span id="box-5.8-shifts-from-private-to-public-transport-in-an-indian-megacity"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-5
(section)
Add languages
Add topic