Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/TS
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== TS.A.2 TS Structure of the Report === <div id="h2-2-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> This technical summary is structured in five sections: Section A ‘Introduction’, Section B ‘Observed Impacts and Adaptation’, Section C ‘Projected Impacts and Risks’, Section D ‘Contribution of Adaptation to Solutions’ and Section E ‘Climate Resilient Development’. Each section includes several headline statements followed by several bullet points providing details about the underlying assessments. All findings and figures are supported by and traceable to the underlying report, indicated by references { in curly brackets } to relevant sections of chapters and cross-chapter papers. Confidence in the key findings of this assessment is communicated using the IPCC calibrated uncertainty language. This calibrated language is designed to consistently evaluate and communicate uncertainties that arise from incomplete knowledge due to a lack of information or from disagreement about what is known or even knowable. The IPCC calibrated language uses qualitative expressions of confidence based on the robustness of evidence for a finding and (where possible) uses quantitative expressions to describe the likelihood of a finding. Each finding is grounded in an evaluation of underlying evidence and agreement. A level of confidence is expressed using five qualifiers, very low, low, medium, high and very high, and typeset in italics, for example, ''medium confidence'' . The following terms have been used to indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: ''virtually certain'' 99–100% probability, ''very likely'' 90–100%, ''likely'' 66–100%, ''as likely as not'' 33–66%, ''unlikely'' 0–33%, ''very unlikely'' 0–10%, ''exceptionally unlikely'' 0–1%. Assessed likelihood is typeset in italics, for example, ''very likely'' . This is consistent with AR5 and the other AR6 reports. (Figure TS.1) { 1.3.4 } <div id="_idContainer004" class="Figure"></div> [[File:97a508ef0f1095d1ac0c2c5074021e78 IPCC_AR6_WGII_Figure_TS_001.png]] '''Figure TS.1 |''' '''The IPCC AR5 and AR6 framework for applying expert judgement in the evaluation and characterisation of assessment findings.''' This illustration depicts the process assessment authors apply in evaluating and communicating the current state of knowledge. { Figure 1.6 } <div id="TS.A.3" class="h2-container"></div> <span id="ts.a.3-key-developments-since-ar5"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/TS
(section)
Add languages
Add topic