Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-9
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 9.5.3.1 Building Envelope ==== <div id="h3-18-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> In North America and Europe, personal attitudes, values, and existing information and support are the most and equally important reasons for improving the building envelope. Consumers have some economic concerns and little technical concerns, the latter related to the performance and maintenance of the installed solutions ( [[#Mata--2021a|Mata et al. 2021a]] ). In other world regions or climate zones the literature is limited. Motivations are often triggered by urgent comfort or replacement needs. Maintaining the aesthetic value may as well hinder the installation of insulation if no technical solutions are easily available ( [[#Haines--2014|Haines and Mitchell 2014]] ; [[#Bright--2019|Bright et al. 2019]] ). Local professionals and practitioners can both encourage ( [[#Friege--2016|Friege 2016]] ; [[#Ozarisoy--2017|Ozarisoy and Altan 2017]] ) and discourage the installation of insulation, according to their knowledge and training ( [[#Curtis--2017|Curtis et al. 2017]] ; [[#Zuhaib--2017|Zuhaib et al. 2017]] ; [[#Maxwell--2018|Maxwell et al. 2018]] ; [[#Tsoka--2018|Tsoka et al. 2018]] ). If energy renovations of the buildings envelopes are not normative, cooperative ownership may be a barrier in apartment buildings ( [[#Miezis--2016|Miezis et al. 2016]] ). Similarly, product information and labelling may be helpful or overwhelming ( [[#Ozarisoy--2017|Ozarisoy and Altan 2017]] ; [[#Lilley--2017|Lilley et al. 2017]] ; [[#Bright--2019|Bright et al. 2019]] ). Decisions are correlated to governmental support (Swantje et al. 2015; [[#Tam--2016|Tam et al. 2016]] ) and peer information ( [[#Friege--2016|Friege et al. 2016]] ; [[#Friege--2016|Friege 2016]] ). The intervention is required to be cost efficient, although value could be placed in the amount of energy saved ( [[#Mortensen--2016|Mortensen et al. 2016]] ; [[#Lilley--2017|Lilley et al. 2017]] ; [[#Howarth--2018|Howarth and Roberts 2018]] ; [[#Kim--2019|Kim et al. 2019]] ) or the short payback period ( [[#Miezis--2016|Miezis et al. 2016]] ). Subsidies have a positive effect ( [[#Swan--2017|Swan et al. 2017]] ). <div id="9.5.3.2" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="adoption-of-efficient-hvac-systems-and-appliances"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-9
(section)
Add languages
Add topic