Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-13
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 13.5.2.2 Aquatic Food ==== <div id="h3-16-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Climate-resilient fish production in Europe is the goal of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) rebuilding fish stocks to MSY levels, but success has been variable ( [[#Froese--2018|Froese et al., 2018]] ; [[#Stecf--2019|Stecf, 2019]] ). Adaptation is largely ignored in related EU policy frameworks such as the CFP, the MSFD and the ‘Strategic guidelines for the sustainable development of EU aquaculture’. ( [[#Pham--2021|Pham et al., 2021]] ). A major governance challenge for adaptation will be the redistribution of the fixed allocation scheme for total allowable catches ( [[#Harte--2019|Harte et al., 2019]] ; [[#Baudron--2020|Baudron et al., 2020]] ). Inflexible and non-adaptive allocation schemes can result in conflicts among European countries ( ''medium confidence'' ), as demonstrated by the case of the Northeast Atlantic mackerel ( [[#Spijkers--2017|Spijkers and Boonstra, 2017]] ). The development of adaptation strategies for seafood production since the Paris Agreement is insufficient in Europe ( ''high confidence'' ) ( [[#Kalikoski--2018|Kalikoski et al., 2018]] ; [[#Pham--2021|Pham et al., 2021]] ). Concrete plans for adaptation planning towards climate-ready fisheries and aquaculture are lacking in all parts of Europe (European Comission, 2018), especially accounting for the expected reduced landings of traditional target species and in preparation for a new portfolio of resource species ( [[#Blanchet--2019|Blanchet et al., 2019]] ). Recent scientific progress towards adaptation in European fisheries and aquaculture include conceptual guidance and demonstration cases on climate adaptation planning ( [[#Pham--2021|Pham et al., 2021]] ) and climate vulnerability assessments ( [[#Blanchet--2019|Blanchet et al., 2019]] ; [[#Peck--2020|Peck et al., 2020]] ; [[#Payne--2021|Payne et al., 2021]] ). Sociopolitical scenarios for European aquatic resources have been developed and have the potential to inform adaptation planning by European fisheries and aquaculture sectors ( [[#Kreiss--2020|Kreiss et al., 2020]] ; [[#Hamon--2021|Hamon et al., 2021]] ; [[#Pinnegar--2021|Pinnegar et al., 2021]] ). <div id="13.5.2.3" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="forests"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-13
(section)
Add languages
Add topic