Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-9
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 9.5.3.6 Circular and Sharing Economy ==== <div id="h3-23-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> The circular and sharing economy begins to be perceived as organisational and technologically innovative, with the potential to provide superior customer value, response to societal trends and positive marketing ( [[#Mercado--2018|Mercado 2018]] ; [[#Cantzler--2020|Cantzler et al. 2020]] ; [[#Nußholz--2020|Nußholz et al. 2020]] ). Although technical and regulatory challenges remain, there are key difficulties around the demonstration of a business case for both consumers and the supply chain ( [[#Pomponi--2017|Pomponi and Moncaster 2017]] ; [[#Hart--2019|Hart et al. 2019]] ). Government support is needed as an initiator but also to reinforce building retrofit targets, promote more stringent energy and material standards for new constructions, and protect consumer interests ( [[#Hongping--2017|Hongping 2017]] ; [[#Fischer--2017|Fischer and Pascucci 2017]] ; Patwa et al. 2020). Taxes clearly incentivise waste reduction and recycling ( [[#Rachel--2011|Rachel and Travis 2011]] ; [[#Ajayi--2015|Ajayi et al. 2015]] ; [[#Volk--2019|Volk et al. 2019]] ). In developing countries, broader, international, market boundaries can allow for a more attractive business model ( [[#Mohit--2020|Mohit et al. 2020]] ). Participative and new ownership models can favour the adoption of prefabricated buildings ( [[#Steinhardt--2016|Steinhardt and Manley 2016]] ). Needs for improvements are observed, in terms of design for flexibility and deconstruction, procurement and prefabrication and off-site construction, standardisation and dimensional coordination, with differences among solutions ( [[#Osmani--2012|Osmani 2012]] ; Coehlo et al.2013; [[#Lu--2013|Lu and Yuan 2013]] ; [[#Cossu--2015|Cossu and Williams 2015]] ; Schiller et al. 2015, 2017; [[#Ajayi--2017|Ajayi et al. 2017]] ; Bakshan et al. 2017). Although training is a basic requirement, attitude, past experience, and social pressure can also be highly relevant, as illustrated for waste management in a survey to construction site workers ( [[#Amal--2017|Amal et al. 2017]] ). Traditional community practices of reuse of building elements are observed to be replaced by a culture of waste ( [[#Ajayi--2015|Ajayi et al. 2015]] ; [[#Hongping--2017|Hongping 2017]] ). <div id="9.6" class="h1-container"></div> <span id="global-and-regional-mitigation-potentials-and-costs"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-9
(section)
Add languages
Add topic