Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-11
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 11.6.3.1 Applied Research ==== <div id="h3-15-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Investing in RDI for low-GHG process emissions is risky and uncompetitive in the absence of convincing climate policy. Research investment should be guided by assessing options, technology readiness levels, and roadmaps towards technology demonstration and commercialisation. The potential GHG and environmental implications need to be assessed early on to assess the sustainability implications and to direct research needs ( [[#Yao--2018|Yao and Masanet 2018]] ; [[#Zimmerman--2020|Zimmerman et al. 2020]] ). Strategic areas for RDI can be focused on a set of possible process options for producing basic materials using fossil-free energy and feedstock, or CCU and CCS (Sections [[#_idTextAnchor014|11.3.5]] and ). Policies to enhance RDI include public funding for applied research, technological and business model experimentation, pilot and demonstration projects, as well as support for education and training – which further have the positive side effect of leading to spill-overs and network effects through labour market mobility and collaboration ( [[#Nemet--2018|Nemet et al. 2018]] ). Innovative business models will not emerge if the transition is not considered along the full value chain with a focus on materials efficiency, circularity, and new roles for industry in a transitioning energy system, including possibly providing demand response for electricity through designed-in flexibility, for example, by combining electrolysis hydrogen production with substantial storage ( [[#Vogl--2018|Vogl et al. 2018]] ). Fostering collaborative innovation across sectors through the support of knowledge sharing and capabilities building is important as mitigation options involve new or stronger sectoral couplings ( [[#Tönjes--2020|Tönjes et al. 2020]] ). One example is linking chemicals to forestry in the upscaling of forest bio-refineries, although it has proven to be difficult to engage a diverse group of actors in such collaborations ( [[#Karltorp--2012|Karltorp and Sandén 2012]] ; Bauer et al. 2018). Heterogeneous collaboration and knowledge exchange can be encouraged through conscious design of RDI programs and by supporting network initiatives involving diverse actor groups ( [[#Van%20Rijnsoever--2015|Van Rijnsoever et al. 2015]] ; [[#Söderholm--2019|Söderholm et al. 2019]] ). <div id="11.6.3.2" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="policy-support-from-demonstration-to-market"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-11
(section)
Add languages
Add topic