Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-4
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 4.8.5.1 Limits to adaptation ==== <div id="section-4-8-5-1-limits-to-adaptation-block-1"></div> SLM can be deployed as a powerful adaptation strategy in most instances of climate change impacts on natural and social systems, yet there are limits to adaptation (Klein et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1157|1157]]</sup> ; Dow, Berhout and Preston 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1158|1158]]</sup> ). Such limits are dynamic and interact with social and institutional conditions (Barnett et al. 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1159|1159]]</sup> ; Filho and Nalau 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1160|1160]]</sup> ). Exceeding adaptation limits will trigger escalating losses or require undesirable transformational change, such as forced migration. The rate of change in relation to the rate of possible adaptation is crucial (Dow et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1161|1161]]</sup> ). How limits to adaptation are defined, and how they can be measured, is contextual and contested. Limits must be assessed in relation to the ultimate goals of adaptation, which is subject to diverse and differential values (Dow et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1162|1162]]</sup> ; Adger et al. 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r1163|1163]]</sup> ). A particularly sensitive issue is whether migration is accepted as adaptation or not (Black et al. 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1164|1164]]</sup> ; Tacoli 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r1165|1165]]</sup> ; Bardsley and Hugo 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r1166|1166]]</sup> ). If migration were understood and accepted as a form of successful adaptation, it would change the limits to adaptation by reducing, or even avoiding, future humanitarian crises caused by climate extremes (Adger et al. 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r1167|1167]]</sup> ; Upadhyay et al. 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1168|1168]]</sup> ; Nalau et al. 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1169|1169]]</sup> ). In the context of land degradation, potential limits to adaptation exist if land degradation becomes so severe and irreversible that livelihoods cannot be maintained, and if migration is either not acceptable or not possible. Examples are coastal erosion where land disappears (Gharbaoui and Blocher 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1170|1170]]</sup> ; Luetz 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1171|1171]]</sup> ), collapsing livelihoods due to thawing of permafrost (Landauer and Juhola 2019 <sup>[[#fn:r1172|1172]]</sup> ), and extreme forms of soil erosion, (e.g., landslides (Van der Geest and Schindler 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1173|1173]]</sup> ) and gully erosion leading to badlands (Poesen et al. 2003 <sup>[[#fn:r1174|1174]]</sup> )). <span id="resilience-and-thresholds"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-4
(section)
Add languages
Add topic