Editing IPCC:AR6/SR15/Chapter-2 (section)

== FAQ 2.1 What Kind of Pathways Limit Warming to 1.5°C and are we on Track? ==

<div id="article-faqs-chapter-2-2-block-1"></div>

'''''Summary''''' '': There is no definitive way to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This Special Report identifies two main conceptual pathways to illustrate different interpretations. One stabilizes global temperature at, or just below, 1.5°C. Another sees global temperature temporarily exceed 1.5°C before coming back down. Countries’ pledges to reduce their emissions are currently not in line with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.''

Scientists use computer models to simulate the emissions of greenhouse gases that would be consistent with different levels of warming. The different possibilities are often referred to as ‘greenhouse gas emission pathways’. There is no single, definitive pathway to limiting warming to 1.5°C.

This IPCC special report identifies two main pathways that explore global warming of 1.5°C. The first involves global temperature stabilizing at or below before 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. The second pathway sees warming exceed 1.5°C around mid-century, remain above 1.5°C for a maximum duration of a few decades, and return to below 1.5°C before 2100. The latter is often referred to as an ‘overshoot’ pathway. Any alternative situation in which global temperature continues to rise, exceeding 1.5°C permanently until the end of the 21st century, is not considered to be a 1.5°C pathway.

The two types of pathway have different implications for greenhouse gas emissions, as well as for climate change impacts and for achieving sustainable development. For example, the larger and longer an ‘overshoot’, the greater the reliance on practices or technologies that remove CO <sub>2</sub>  from the atmosphere, on top of reducing the sources of emissions (mitigation). Such ideas for CO <sub>2 </sub> removal have not been proven to work at scale and, therefore, run the risk of being less practical, effective or economical than assumed. There is also the risk that the use of CO <sub>2 </sub> removal techniques ends up competing for land and water, and if these trade-offs are not appropriately managed, they can adversely affect sustainable development. Additionally, a larger and longer overshoot increases the risk for irreversible climate impacts, such as the onset of the collapse of polar ice shelves and accelerated sea level rise.

Countries that formally accept or ‘ratify’ the Paris Agreement submit pledges for how they intend to address climate change. Unique to each country, these pledges are known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Different groups of researchers around the world have analysed the combined effect of adding up all the NDCs. Such analyses show that current pledges are not on track to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. If current pledges for 2030 are achieved but no more, researchers find very few (if any) ways to reduce emissions after 2030 sufficiently quickly to limit warming to 1.5°C. This, in turn, suggests that with the national pledges as they stand, warming would exceed 1.5°C, at least for a period of time, and practices and technologies that remove CO <sub>2</sub>  from the atmosphere at a global scale would be required to return warming to 1.5°C at a later date.

A world that is consistent with holding warming to 1.5°C would see greenhouse gas emissions rapidly decline in the coming decade, with strong international cooperation and a scaling up of countries’ combined ambition beyond current NDCs. In contrast, delayed action, limited international cooperation, and weak or fragmented policies that lead to stagnating or increasing greenhouse gas emissions would put the possibility of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels out of reach.

<div id="article-faqs-chapter-2-2-block-2"></div>

<span id="faq-2.1-figure-1"></span>
<!-- START IMG -->
<!-- IMG TITLE -->
'''FAQ 2.1 Figure 1'''

<span id="two-main-pathways-for-limiting-global-temperature-rise-to-1.5c-above-pre-industrial-levels-are-discussed-in-this-special-report."></span>
<!-- IMG CAPTION -->
'''Two main pathways for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels are discussed in this Special Report.'''
<!-- IMG FILE -->
[[File:943c2a756c42f6db334cdf19b0f5e521 FAQ-2.1-e1547633227917-1024x500.jpg]]

These are: stabilizing global temperature at, or just below, 1.5°C (left) and global temperature temporarily exceeding 1.5°C before coming back down later in the century (right). Temperatures shown are relative to pre-industrial but pathways are illustrative only, demonstrating conceptual not quantitative characteristics.

<!-- END IMG -->
<div id="article-faqs-chapter-2-2-block-4" class="box"></div>

<span id="faq-2.2-what-do-energy-supply-and-demand-have-to-do-with-limiting-warming-to-1.5c"></span>