Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-6
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 6.6.2.3.2 Shipping ===== <div id="h4-2-siblings" class="h4-siblings"></div> Quantifying the effects of shipping on climate is particularly challenging because (i) the sulphate cooling impact is dominated by aerosol–cloud interactions and (ii) ship emissions contain NO <sub>x</sub> , SO <sub>x</sub> and BC, which lead to mixed particles. Previous estimates of the sulphate radiative effects from present-day shipping span the range –47 to –8 mW m <sup>–2</sup> (direct radiative effect) and –600 to –38 mW m <sup>–2</sup> (indirect radiative effects) (Lauer et al. , 2007; Balkanski et al. , 2010; Eyring et al. , 2010; Lund et al. , 2012) . [[#Partanen--2013|Partanen et al. (2013)]] reported a global mean ERF for year-2010 shipping aerosol emissions of –390 mW m <sup>–2</sup> . The temperature change has been shown to be highly sensitive to the choice of aerosol–cloud parametrization ( [[#Lund--2012|Lund et al., 2012]] ). One year of global present-day shipping emissions, not considering the impact of recent low sulphur fuel regulation ( [[#IMO--2016|IMO, 2016]] ), are estimated to cause net cooling in the near term (–0.0024°C ± 0.0025°C) and slight warming (+0.00033°C ± 0.00015°C) on a 100-year horizon ( [[#Lund--2020|Lund et al., 2020]] ). Shipping is also of importance for air pollution in coastal areas along the major trade routes, especially in Europe and Asia (Corbett et al. , 2007; H. Liu et al. , 2016, Figure 6.17; Jonson et al. , 2020). Jonson et al. (2020) estimated that shipping is responsible for 10% or more of the controllable PM <sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and depositions of oxidised nitrogen and sulphur for many coastal countries. Widespread introduction of low-sulphur fuels in shipping from 2020 ( [[#IMO--2016|IMO, 2016]] ) will lead to improved air quality and reduction in premature mortality and morbidity ( [[#Sofiev--2018|Sofiev et al., 2018]] ). In summary, a year’s worth of present-day global shipping emissions (i.e., without the implementation of the 2020 clean fuel standards) cause a net global cooling (–0.0024 ± 0.0025°C) on 10–20 year time horizons ( ''high confidence'' ) but its magnitude is of ''low confidence'' . <div id="6.6.2.3.3" class="h4-container"></div> <span id="land-transportation"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-6
(section)
Add languages
Add topic