Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-11
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 11.6.4.6 Extended Producer Responsibility ==== <div id="h3-22-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Extended producer responsibility (EPR) systems are increasingly used by policymakers to require producers to take responsibility for the end life of their outputs and to cover the cost of recycling of materials or otherwise responsibly managing problematic wastes ( [[#Kaza--2018|Kaza et al. 2018]] ). According to the OECD, there are about 400 EPR systems in operation worldwide, three quarters of which have been established over the last two decades. One third of EPR systems cover small consumer electronic equipment, followed by packaging and tyres (each 17%), vehicles, lead-acid batteries and a range of other products ( [[#OECD--2016|OECD 2016]] ). While the economic value of some discarded materials such as steel, paper and aluminium is generally high enough to justify the cost and efforts of recycling, at current rates of 85%, above 60%, and 43%, respectively ( [[#Graedel--2011|Graedel et al. 2011]] ; Cullen and Allwood 2013), others like plastic or concrete have a much lower re-circularity value ( [[#Graedel--2011|Graedel et al. 2011]] ). Most plastic waste ends up in landfills or dumped in the environment, with 9% recycled and 12% incinerated globally ( [[#Geyer--2017|Geyer et al. 2017]] ; [[#UNEP--2018|UNEP 2018]] ). Collected waste plastics from OECD countries were largely exported to China until a ban in 2018 required OECD countries to review their practices ( [[#Qu--2019|Qu et al. 2019]] ). EPR schemes may thus need to be strengthened to actually achieve a reduced use of virgin GHG-intensive materials. The potential for re-circularity of unreacted cement and aggregates in concrete is increasing as new standards and requirement develops. For example, concrete fines are now standardised as a new cement constituent in the European standardisation CEN/TC 51 – ‘cements and construction limes’. <div id="11.6.5" class="h2-container"></div> <span id="knowledge-and-capacity"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-11
(section)
Add languages
Add topic