Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SR15/Chapter-2
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== References == <ol> <li><span id="fn:r1">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r2">McCollum, D.L., V. Krey, and K. Riahi, 2011: An integrated approach to energy sustainability. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''1(9)''' , 428–429, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1297 10.1038/nclimate1297] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2012: Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development. In: ''Global Energy Assessment – Toward a Sustainable Future'' . Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 1203–1306, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511793677.023 10.1017/cbo9780511793677.023] . ----- IEA, 2017d: ''World Energy Outlook 2017'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 782 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r3">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r4">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, A. Reisinger, M. Meinshausen, and K. Riahi, 2013b: Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. ''Nature'' , '''493(7430)''' , 79–83, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11787 10.1038/nature11787] . ----- Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r5">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, A. Reisinger, M. Meinshausen, and K. Riahi, 2013b: Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. ''Nature'' , '''493(7430)''' , 79–83, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11787 10.1038/nature11787] . ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</li> <li><span id="fn:r6">Beck, S. and M. Mahony, 2017: The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(5)''' , 311–313, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3264 10.1038/nclimate3264] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r7">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r8">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r9">Rogelj, J. et al., 2015b: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(6)''' , 519–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572 10.1038/nclimate2572] .</span> ----- Akimoto, K., F. Sano, and T. Tomoda, 2017: GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5°C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways. ''Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change'' , 1–14, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z 10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z] . ----- Marcucci, A., S. Kypreos, and E. Panos, 2017: The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: Energy transition and the role of direct air capture. ''Climatic Change'' , '''144(2)''' , 181–193, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8 10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8] . ----- Su, X. et al., 2017: Emission pathways to achieve 2.0°C and 1.5°C climate targets. ''Earth’s Future'' , '''5(6)''' , 592–604, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016ef000492 10.1002/2016ef000492] . ----- Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] . ----- Bertram, C. et al., 2018: Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5°C mitigation scenarios. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064038, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec 10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec] . ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Liu, J.-Y. et al., 2018: Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5°C. ''Carbon Management'' , 1–11, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374 10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374] . ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- Strefler, J., T. Amann, N. Bauer, E. Kriegler, and J. Hartmann, 2018a: Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(3)''' , 034010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] . ----- Vrontisi, Z. et al., 2018: Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5°C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044039, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab53e 10.1088/1748-9326/aab53e] . ----- Zhang, R., S. Fujimori, and T. Hanaoka, 2018: The contribution of transport policies to the mitigation potential and cost of 2°C and 1.5°C goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(5)''' , 054008, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0d 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0d] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r10">Meinshausen, M., S.C.B. Raper, and T.M.L. Wigley, 2011a: Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 1: Model description and calibration. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''11(4)''' , 1417–1456, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1417-2011 10.5194/acp-11-1417-2011] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r11">Smith, C.J. et al., 2018: FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. ''Geoscientific Model Development'' , '''11(6)''' , 2273–2297, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r12">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r13">Etminan, M., G. Myhre, E.J. Highwood, and K.P. Shine, 2016: Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''43(24)''' , 12,614–12,623, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016gl071930 10.1002/2016gl071930] .</span> ----- Smith, C.J. et al., 2018: FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. ''Geoscientific Model Development'' , '''11(6)''' , 2273–2297, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r14">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r15">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r16">Rao, S. et al., 2017: Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 346–358, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r17">Hejazi, M. et al., 2014: Long-term global water projections using six socioeconomic scenarios in an integrated assessment modeling framework. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''81''' , 205–226, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.006 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.006] .</span> ----- Fricko, O. et al., 2016: Energy sector water use implications of a 2°C climate policy. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(3)''' , 034011, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034011 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034011] . ----- Mouratiadou, I. et al., 2016: The impact of climate change mitigation on water demand for energy and food: An integrated analysis based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Environmental Science & Policy'' , '''64''' , 48–58, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.007 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.007] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r18">von Stechow, C. et al., 2015: Integrating Global Climate Change Mitigation Goals with Other Sustainability Objectives: A Synthesis. ''Annual Review of Environment and Resources'' , '''40(1)''' , 363–394, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-021113-095626 10.1146/annurev-environ-021113-095626] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r19">Bruckner, T., I.A. Bashmakov, and Y. Mulugetta, 2014: Energy Systems. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 511–598.</span> ----- IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp. ----- Jacobson, M.Z., 2017: Roadmaps to Transition Countries to 100% Clean, Renewable Energy for All Purposes to Curtail Global Warming, Air Pollution, and Energy Risk. ''Earth’s Future'' , '''5(10)''' , 948–952, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000672 10.1002/2017ef000672] . ----- OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r20">Lucon, O. et al., 2014: Buildings. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 671–738.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r21">Sims, R. et al., 2014: Transport. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadne, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 599–670.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r22">Giannakidis, G., K. Karlsson, M. Labriet, and B. Ó Gallachóir (eds.), 2018: ''Limiting Global Warming to Well Below 2°C: Energy System Modelling and Policy Development'' . Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 423 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7 10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r23">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r24">Creutzig, F. et al., 2017: The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. ''Nature Energy'' , '''2(9)''' , 17140, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 10.1038/nenergy.2017.140] .</span> ----- Jacobson, M.Z. et al., 2017: 100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World. ''Joule'' , '''1(1)''' , 108–121, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005 10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r25">Luderer, G. et al., 2017: Assessment of wind and solar power in global low-carbon energy scenarios: An introduction. ''Energy Economics'' , '''64''' , 542–551, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.027 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.027] .</span> ----- Pietzcker, R.C. et al., 2017: System integration of wind and solar power in integrated assessment models: A cross-model evaluation of new approaches. ''Energy Economics'' , '''64''' , 583–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r26">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r27">Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r28">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r29">Bertram, C. et al., 2018: Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5°C mitigation scenarios. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064038, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec 10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r30">Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</span> ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r31">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r32">Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r33">Masui, T. et al., 2011: An emission pathway for stabilization at 6 W m <sup>–</sup> <sup>2</sup> radiative forcing. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1)''' , 59–76, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0150-5 10.1007/s10584-011-0150-5] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2011: RCP 8.5 – A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1)''' , 33, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y] . ----- Thomson, A.M. et al., 2011: RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1–2)''' , 77–94, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2011b: RCP2.6: Exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1)''' , 95–116, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3 10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r34">van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2007: Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: An assessment of reduction strategies and costs. ''Climatic Change'' , '''81(2)''' , 119–159, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9 10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2011a: The representative concentration pathways: An overview. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1)''' , 5–31, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z 10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z] . ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</li> <li><span id="fn:r35">Meinshausen, M. et al., 2009: Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. ''Nature'' , '''458(7242)''' , 1158–1162, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08017 10.1038/nature08017] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2011: Emission pathways consistent with a 2°C global temperature limit. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''1(8)''' , 413–418, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1258 10.1038/nclimate1258] . ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r36">Meinshausen, M. et al., 2009: Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. ''Nature'' , '''458(7242)''' , 1158–1162, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08017 10.1038/nature08017] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r37">Rogelj, J. et al., 2011: Emission pathways consistent with a 2°C global temperature limit. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''1(8)''' , 413–418, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1258 10.1038/nclimate1258] .</span> ----- Stocker, T.F. et al., 2013: Technical Summary. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–115. ----- Friedlingstein, P. et al., 2014a: Persistent growth of CO <sub>2</sub> emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''7(10)''' , 709–715, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 10.1038/ngeo2248] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r38">Bowerman, N.H.A., D.J. Frame, C. Huntingford, J.A. Lowe, and M.R. Allen, 2011: Cumulative carbon emissions, emissions floors and short-term rates of warming: implications for policy. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''369(1934)''' , 45–66, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0288 10.1098/rsta.2010.0288] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., M. Meinshausen, M. Schaeffer, R. Knutti, and K. Riahi, 2015a: Impact of short-lived non-CO <sub>2</sub> mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(7)''' , 075001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001 10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016b: Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868 10.1038/nclimate2868] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r39">Lamarque, J.-F. et al., 2011: Global and regional evolution of short-lived radiatively-active gases and aerosols in the Representative Concentration Pathways. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1–2)''' , 191–212, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0155-0 10.1007/s10584-011-0155-0] .</span> ----- Bowerman, N.H.A. et al., 2013: The role of short-lived climate pollutants in meeting temperature goals. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''3(12)''' , 1021–1024, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2034 10.1038/nclimate2034] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2014b: Disentangling the effects of CO <sub>2</sub> and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(46)''' , 16325–16330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415631111 10.1073/pnas.1415631111] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r40">Huntingford, C. and J. Lowe, 2007: “Overshoot” Scenarios and Climate Change. ''Science'' , '''316(5826)''' , 829, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.316.5826.829b 10.1126/science.316.5826.829b] .</span> ----- Wigley, T.M.L., R. Richels, and J. Edmonds, 2007: Overshoot Pathways to CO <sub>2</sub> stabilization in a multi-gas context. In: ''Human Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Perspective'' [Schlesinger, M.E., H.S. Kheshgi, J. Smith, F.C. de la Chesnaye, J.M. Reilly, T. Wilson, and C. Kolstad (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 84–92, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511619472.009 10.1017/cbo9780511619472.009] . ----- Nohara, D. et al., 2015: Examination of a climate stabilization pathway via zero-emissions using Earth system models. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(9)''' , 095005, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/095005 10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/095005] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2015d: Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(10)''' , 105007, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/105007 10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/105007] . ----- Zickfeld, K. and T. Herrington, 2015: The time lag between a carbon dioxide emission and maximum warming increases with the size of the emission. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(3)''' , 031001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/031001 10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/031001] . ----- Schleussner, C.-F. et al., 2016: Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(7)''' , 827–835, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3096 10.1038/nclimate3096] . ----- Xu, Y. and V. Ramanathan, 2017: Well below 2°C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(39)''' , 10315–10323, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618481114 10.1073/pnas.1618481114] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r41">Bindoff, N. et al., 2013: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 867–952.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r42">Le Quéré, C. et al., 2018: Global Carbon Budget 2017. ''Earth System Science Data'' , '''10(1)''' , 405–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r43">Weyant, J.P., F.C. Chesnaye, and G.J. Blanford, 2006: Overview of EMF-21: Multigas Mitigation and Climate Policy. ''The Energy Journal'' , '''27''' , 1–32, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-volsi2006-nosi3-1 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-volsi2006-nosi3-1] .</span> ----- Shindell, D.T. et al., 2012: Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security. ''Science'' , '''335(6065)''' , 183–189, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026 10.1126/science.1210026] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2014b: Disentangling the effects of CO <sub>2</sub> and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(46)''' , 16325–16330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415631111 10.1073/pnas.1415631111] . ----- Rogelj, J., M. Meinshausen, M. Schaeffer, R. Knutti, and K. Riahi, 2015a: Impact of short-lived non-CO <sub>2</sub> mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(7)''' , 075001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001 10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001] . ----- Samset, B.H. et al., 2018: Climate impacts from a removal of anthropogenic aerosol emissions. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''45(2)''' , 1020–1029, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076079 10.1002/2017gl076079] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r44">Fricko, O. et al., 2017: The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 251–267, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r45">Shindell, D.T. et al., 2012: Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security. ''Science'' , '''335(6065)''' , 183–189, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026 10.1126/science.1210026] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2014b: Disentangling the effects of CO <sub>2</sub> and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(46)''' , 16325–16330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415631111 10.1073/pnas.1415631111] . ----- Rogelj, J., M. Meinshausen, M. Schaeffer, R. Knutti, and K. Riahi, 2015a: Impact of short-lived non-CO <sub>2</sub> mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(7)''' , 075001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001 10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001] . ----- Stohl, A. et al., 2015: Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''15(18)''' , 10529–10566, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015 10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015] . ----- Collins, W.J. et al., 2018: Increased importance of methane reduction for a 1.5 degree target. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(5)''' , 054003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab89c 10.1088/1748-9326/aab89c] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r46">Samset, B.H. et al., 2018: Climate impacts from a removal of anthropogenic aerosol emissions. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''45(2)''' , 1020–1029, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076079 10.1002/2017gl076079] .</span> ----- Smith, C.J. et al., 2018: FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. ''Geoscientific Model Development'' , '''11(6)''' , 2273–2297, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r47">Myhre, G. et al., 2013: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 659–740.</span> ----- Samset, B.H. et al., 2018: Climate impacts from a removal of anthropogenic aerosol emissions. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''45(2)''' , 1020–1029, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076079 10.1002/2017gl076079] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r48">Myhre, G. et al., 2017: Multi-model simulations of aerosol and ozone radiative forcing due to anthropogenic emission changes during the period 1990-2015. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''17(4)''' , 2709–2720, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2709-2017 10.5194/acp-17-2709-2017] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r49">Malavelle, F.F. et al., 2017: Strong constraints on aerosol–cloud interactions from volcanic eruptions. ''Nature'' , '''546(7659)''' , 485–491, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature22974 10.1038/nature22974] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r50">Ghan, S.J. et al., 2013: A simple model of global aerosol indirect effects. ''Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres'' , '''118(12)''' , 6688–6707, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50567 10.1002/jgrd.50567] .</span> ----- Jones, A., J.M. Haywood, and C.D. Jones, 2018: Can reducing black carbon and methane below RCP2.6 levels keep global warming below 1.5°C? ''Atmospheric Science Letters'' , '''19(6)''' , e821, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asl.821 10.1002/asl.821] . ----- Smith, C.J. et al., 2018: FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. ''Geoscientific Model Development'' , '''11(6)''' , 2273–2297, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r51">Carslaw, K.S. et al., 2013: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing. ''Nature'' , '''503(7474)''' , 67–71, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12674 10.1038/nature12674] .</span> ----- Kretzschmar, J. et al., 2017: Comment on “Rethinking the Lower Bound on Aerosol Radiative Forcing”. ''Journal of Climate'' , '''30(16)''' , 6579–6584, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0668.1 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0668.1] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r52">Hauglustaine, D.A., Y. Balkanski, and M. Schulz, 2014: A global model simulation of present and future nitrate aerosols and their direct radiative forcing of climate. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''14''' , 11031–11063, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11031-2014 10.5194/acp-14-11031-2014] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r53">Etminan, M., G. Myhre, E.J. Highwood, and K.P. Shine, 2016: Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''43(24)''' , 12,614–12,623, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016gl071930 10.1002/2016gl071930] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r54">Myhre, G. et al., 2013: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 659–740.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r55">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r56">Myhre, G. et al., 2013: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 659–740.</span> ----- Shindell, D.T., G. Faluvegi, L. Rotstayn, and G. Milly, 2015: Spatial patterns of radiative forcing and surface temperature response. ''Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres'' , '''120(11)''' , 5385–5403, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022752 10.1002/2014jd022752] . ----- Marvel, K., G.A. Schmidt, R.L. Miller, and L.S. Nazarenko, 2016: Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(4)''' , 386–389, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2888 10.1038/nclimate2888] . ----- Samset, B.H. et al., 2016: Fast and slow precipitation responses to individual climate forcers: A PDRMIP multimodel study. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''43(6)''' , 2782–2791, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016gl068064 10.1002/2016gl068064] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r57">Schneider, T. et al., 2017: Climate goals and computing the future of clouds. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(1)''' , 3–5, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3190 10.1038/nclimate3190] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r58">Collins, M. et al., 2013: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1029–1136.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r59">Forster, P.M., 2016: Inference of Climate Sensitivity from Analysis of Earth’s Energy Budget. ''Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences'' , '''44(1)''' , 85–106, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105156 10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105156] .</span> ----- Gregory, J.M. and T. Andrews, 2016: Variation in climate sensitivity and feedback parameters during the historical period. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''43(8)''' , 3911–3920, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016gl068406 10.1002/2016gl068406] . ----- Rugenstein, M.A.A. et al., 2016: Multiannual Ocean-Atmosphere Adjustments to Radiative Forcing. ''Journal of Climate'' , '''29(15)''' , 5643–5659, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0312.1 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0312.1] . ----- Armour, K.C., 2017: Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(5)''' , 331–335, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3278 10.1038/nclimate3278] . ----- Ceppi, P. and J.M. Gregory, 2017: Relationship of tropospheric stability to climate sensitivity and Earth’s observed radiation budget. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(50)''' , 13126–13131, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714308114 10.1073/pnas.1714308114] . ----- Knutti, R., M.A.A. Rugenstein, and G.C. Hegerl, 2017: Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''10(10)''' , 727–736, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3017 10.1038/ngeo3017] . ----- Proistosescu, C. and P.J. Huybers, 2017: Slow climate mode reconciles historical and model-based estimates of climate sensitivity. ''Science Advances'' , '''3(7)''' , e1602821, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602821 10.1126/sciadv.1602821] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r60">Sherwood, S.C., S. Bony, and J.-L. Dufresne, 2014: Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing. ''Nature'' , '''505(7481)''' , 37–42, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12829 10.1038/nature12829] .</span> ----- Zhai, C., J.H. Jiang, and H. Su, 2015: Long-term cloud change imprinted in seasonal cloud variation: More evidence of high climate sensitivity. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''42(20)''' , 8729–8737, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015gl065911 10.1002/2015gl065911] . ----- Tan, I., T. Storelvmo, and M.D. Zelinka, 2016: Observational constraints on mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensitivity. ''Science'' , '''352(6282)''' , 224–227, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5300 10.1126/science.aad5300] . ----- Brown, P.T. and K. Caldeira, 2017: Greater future global warming inferred from Earth’s recent energy budget. ''Nature'' , '''552(7683)''' , 45–50, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature24672 10.1038/nature24672] . ----- Knutti, R., M.A.A. Rugenstein, and G.C. Hegerl, 2017: Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''10(10)''' , 727–736, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3017 10.1038/ngeo3017] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r61">Lewis, N. and J. Curry, 2018: The impact of recent forcing and ocean heat uptake data on estimates of climate sensitivity. ''Journal of Climate'' , JCLI–D–17–0667.1, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-17-0667.1 10.1175/jcli-d-17-0667.1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r62">Lewis, N. and J.A. Curry, 2015: The implications for climate sensitivity of AR5 forcing and heat uptake estimates. ''Climate Dynamics'' , '''45(3–4)''' , 1009–1023, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2342-y 10.1007/s00382-014-2342-y] .</span> ----- Cox, P.M., C. Huntingford, and M.S. Williamson, 2018: Emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity from global temperature variability. ''Nature'' , '''553(7688)''' , 319–322, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature25450 10.1038/nature25450] . ----- Lewis, N. and J. Curry, 2018: The impact of recent forcing and ocean heat uptake data on estimates of climate sensitivity. ''Journal of Climate'' , JCLI–D–17–0667.1, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-17-0667.1 10.1175/jcli-d-17-0667.1] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r63">Brown, P.T. and K. Caldeira, 2017: Greater future global warming inferred from Earth’s recent energy budget. ''Nature'' , '''552(7683)''' , 45–50, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature24672 10.1038/nature24672] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r64">Rogelj, J., M. Meinshausen, J. Sedláček, and R. Knutti, 2014a: Implications of potentially lower climate sensitivity on climate projections and policy. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''9(3)''' , 031003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/031003 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/031003] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r65">Smith, C.J. et al., 2018: FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. ''Geoscientific Model Development'' , '''11(6)''' , 2273–2297, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r66">Duce, R.A. et al., 2008: Impacts of Atmospheric Anthropogenic Nitrogen on the Open Ocean. ''Science'' , '''320(5878)''' , 893–897, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1150369 10.1126/science.1150369] .</span> ----- Mahowald, N.M. et al., 2017: Aerosol Deposition Impacts on Land and Ocean Carbon Cycles. ''Current Climate Change Reports'' , '''3(1)''' , 16–31, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0056-z 10.1007/s40641-017-0056-z] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r67">de Vries, W., M. Posch, D. Simpson, and G.J. Reinds, 2017: Modelling long-term impacts of changes in climate, nitrogen deposition and ozone exposure on carbon sequestration of European forest ecosystems. ''Science of The Total Environment'' , '''605–606''' , 1097–1116, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.132 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.132] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r68">Narayan, C., P.M. Fernandes, J. van Brusselen, and A. Schuck, 2007: Potential for CO <sub>2</sub> emissions mitigation in Europe through prescribed burning in the context of the Kyoto Protocol. ''Forest Ecology and Management'' , '''251(3)''' , 164–173, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.042 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.042] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r69">Cadule, P., L. Bopp, and P. Friedlingstein, 2009: A revised estimate of the processes contributing to global warming due to climate-carbon feedback. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''36(14)''' , L14705, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009gl038681 10.1029/2009gl038681] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r70">Scott, C.E. et al., 2018: Substantial large-scale feedbacks between natural aerosols and climate. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''11(1)''' , 44–48, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0020-5 10.1038/s41561-017-0020-5] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r71">MacDougall, A.H., K. Zickfeld, R. Knutti, and H.D. Matthews, 2015: Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(12)''' , 125003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003] .</span> ----- Burke, E.J. et al., 2017: Quantifying uncertainties of permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''14(12)''' , 3051–3066, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3051-2017 10.5194/bg-14-3051-2017] . ----- Lowe, J.A. and D. Bernie, 2018: The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20170263, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0263 10.1098/rsta.2017.0263] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r72">Schädel, C. et al., 2014: Circumpolar assessment of permafrost C quality and its vulnerability over time using long-term incubation data. ''Global Change Biology'' , '''20(2)''' , 641–652, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12417 10.1111/gcb.12417] .</span> ----- Schuur, E.A.G. et al., 2015: Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. ''Nature'' , '''520(7546)''' , 171–179, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14338 10.1038/nature14338] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r73">Voigt, C. et al., 2017a: Warming of subarctic tundra increases emissions of all three important greenhouse gases – carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. ''Global Change Biology'' , '''23(8)''' , 3121–3138, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13563 10.1111/gcb.13563] .</span> ----- Voigt, C. et al., 2017b: Increased nitrous oxide emissions from Arctic peatlands after permafrost thaw. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(24)''' , 6238–6243, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702902114 10.1073/pnas.1702902114] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r74">Schuur, E.A.G. et al., 2015: Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. ''Nature'' , '''520(7546)''' , 171–179, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14338 10.1038/nature14338] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r75">Schädel, C. et al., 2014: Circumpolar assessment of permafrost C quality and its vulnerability over time using long-term incubation data. ''Global Change Biology'' , '''20(2)''' , 641–652, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12417 10.1111/gcb.12417] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r76">Schädel, C. et al., 2016: Potential carbon emissions dominated by carbon dioxide from thawed permafrost soils. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(10)''' , 950–953, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3054 10.1038/nclimate3054] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r77">Burke, E.J., I.P. Hartley, and C.D. Jones, 2012: Uncertainties in the global temperature change caused by carbon release from permafrost thawing. ''Cryosphere'' , '''6(5)''' , 1063–1076, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-1063-2012 10.5194/tc-6-1063-2012] .</span> ----- Schneider von Deimling, T. et al., 2012: Estimating the near-surface permafrost-carbon feedback on global warming. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''9(2)''' , 649–665, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-649-2012 10.5194/bg-9-649-2012] . ----- Schneider von Deimling, T. et al., 2015: Observation-based modelling of permafrost carbon fluxes with accounting for deep carbon deposits and thermokarst activity. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''12(11)''' , 3469–3488, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3469-2015 10.5194/bg-12-3469-2015] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r78">Schneider von Deimling, T. et al., 2015: Observation-based modelling of permafrost carbon fluxes with accounting for deep carbon deposits and thermokarst activity. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''12(11)''' , 3469–3488, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3469-2015 10.5194/bg-12-3469-2015] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r79">Collins, M. et al., 2013: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1029–1136.</span> ----- Friedlingstein, P. et al., 2014a: Persistent growth of CO <sub>2</sub> emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''7(10)''' , 709–715, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 10.1038/ngeo2248] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016b: Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868 10.1038/nclimate2868] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r80">Schneider, T. et al., 2017: Climate goals and computing the future of clouds. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(1)''' , 3–5, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3190 10.1038/nclimate3190] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r81">Meinshausen, M. et al., 2011b: The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1–2)''' , 213–241, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z 10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z] .</span> ----- Stocker, T.F. et al., 2013: Technical Summary. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–115.</li> <li><span id="fn:r82">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r83">Rogelj, J. et al., 2016b: Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868 10.1038/nclimate2868] .</span> ----- Matthews, H.D. et al., 2017: Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets. ''Current Climate Change Reports'' , '''3''' , 69–77, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0055-0 10.1007/s40641-017-0055-0] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r84">Allen, M.R. et al., 2009: Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. ''Nature'' , '''458(7242)''' , 1163–1166, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08019 10.1038/nature08019] .</span> ----- Matthews, H.D., N.P. Gillett, P.A. Stott, and K. Zickfeld, 2009: The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. ''Nature'' , '''459(7248)''' , 829–832, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08047 10.1038/nature08047] . ----- Zickfeld, K., M. Eby, H.D. Matthews, and A.J. Weaver, 2009: Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''106(38)''' , 16129–16134, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805800106 10.1073/pnas.0805800106] . ----- IPCC, 2013a: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r85">Friedlingstein, P. et al., 2014a: Persistent growth of CO <sub>2</sub> emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''7(10)''' , 709–715, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 10.1038/ngeo2248] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016b: Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868 10.1038/nclimate2868] . ----- Matthews, H.D. et al., 2017: Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets. ''Current Climate Change Reports'' , '''3''' , 69–77, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0055-0 10.1007/s40641-017-0055-0] . ----- Mengis, N., A.- Partanen, J. Jalbert, and H.D. Matthews, 2018: 1.5°C carbon budget dependent on carbon cycle uncertainty and future non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcing. ''Scientific Reports'' , '''8(1)''' , 5831, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24241-1 10.1038/s41598-018-24241-1] . ----- Tokarska, K.B., N.P. Gillett, V.K. Arora, W.G. Lee, and K. Zickfeld, 2018: The influence of non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings on cumulative carbon emissions budgets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(3)''' , 034039, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd 10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r86">Friedlingstein, P. et al., 2014a: Persistent growth of CO <sub>2</sub> emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''7(10)''' , 709–715, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 10.1038/ngeo2248] .</span> ----- MacDougall, A.H., K. Zickfeld, R. Knutti, and H.D. Matthews, 2015: Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(12)''' , 125003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003] . ----- Peters, G.P., 2016: The ‘best available science’ to inform 1.5°C policy choices. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(7)''' , 646–649, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3000 10.1038/nclimate3000] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016b: Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868 10.1038/nclimate2868] . ----- Matthews, H.D. et al., 2017: Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets. ''Current Climate Change Reports'' , '''3''' , 69–77, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0055-0 10.1007/s40641-017-0055-0] . ----- Millar, R.J. et al., 2017: Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''10(10)''' , 741–747, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3031 10.1038/ngeo3031] . ----- Goodwin, P. et al., 2018b: Pathways to 1.5 and 2°C warming based on observational and geological constraints. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''11(1)''' , 1–22, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0054-8 10.1038/s41561-017-0054-8] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018b: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457] . ----- Lowe, J.A. and D. Bernie, 2018: The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20170263, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0263 10.1098/rsta.2017.0263] . ----- Mengis, N., A.- Partanen, J. Jalbert, and H.D. Matthews, 2018: 1.5°C carbon budget dependent on carbon cycle uncertainty and future non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcing. ''Scientific Reports'' , '''8(1)''' , 5831, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24241-1 10.1038/s41598-018-24241-1] . ----- Millar, R.J. and P. Friedlingstein, 2018: The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160449, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0449 10.1098/rsta.2016.0449] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- Schurer, A.P. et al., 2018: Interpretations of the Paris climate target. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''11(4)''' , 220–221, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0086-8 10.1038/s41561-018-0086-8] . ----- Séférian, R., M. Rocher, C. Guivarch, and J. Colin, 2018: Constraints on biomass energy deployment in mitigation pathways: the case of water limitation. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , 1–32, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabcd7 10.1088/1748-9326/aabcd7] . ----- Tokarska, K.B. and N.P. Gillett, 2018: Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5°C global warming. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 296–299, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9 10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9] . ----- Tokarska, K.B., N.P. Gillett, V.K. Arora, W.G. Lee, and K. Zickfeld, 2018: The influence of non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings on cumulative carbon emissions budgets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(3)''' , 034039, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd 10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r87">MacDougall, A.H., K. Zickfeld, R. Knutti, and H.D. Matthews, 2015: Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(12)''' , 125003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003] .</span> ----- Goodwin, P., S. Brown, I.D. Haigh, R.J. Nicholls, and J.M. Matter, 2018a: Adjusting Mitigation Pathways to Stabilize Climate at 1.5°C and 2.0°C Rise in Global Temperatures to Year 2300. ''Earth’s Future'' , 0–3, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000732 10.1002/2017ef000732] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r88">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r89">Lowe, J.A. and D. Bernie, 2018: The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20170263, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0263 10.1098/rsta.2017.0263] .</span> ----- Séférian, R., M. Rocher, C. Guivarch, and J. Colin, 2018: Constraints on biomass energy deployment in mitigation pathways: the case of water limitation. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , 1–32, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabcd7 10.1088/1748-9326/aabcd7] . ----- Tokarska, K.B. and N.P. Gillett, 2018: Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5°C global warming. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 296–299, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9 10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r90">IPCC, 2014a: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 151 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r91">IPCC, 2013b: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r92">MacDougall, A.H., K. Zickfeld, R. Knutti, and H.D. Matthews, 2015: Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(12)''' , 125003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003] .</span> ----- Burke, E.J. et al., 2017: Quantifying uncertainties of permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''14(12)''' , 3051–3066, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3051-2017 10.5194/bg-14-3051-2017] . ----- Lowe, J.A. and D. Bernie, 2018: The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20170263, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0263 10.1098/rsta.2017.0263] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r93">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r94">Millar, R.J. et al., 2017: Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''10(10)''' , 741–747, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3031 10.1038/ngeo3031] .</span> ----- Goodwin, P., S. Brown, I.D. Haigh, R.J. Nicholls, and J.M. Matter, 2018a: Adjusting Mitigation Pathways to Stabilize Climate at 1.5°C and 2.0°C Rise in Global Temperatures to Year 2300. ''Earth’s Future'' , 0–3, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000732 10.1002/2017ef000732] . ----- Tokarska, K.B. and N.P. Gillett, 2018: Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5°C global warming. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 296–299, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9 10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r95">Le Quéré, C. et al., 2018: Global Carbon Budget 2017. ''Earth System Science Data'' , '''10(1)''' , 405–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r96">Le Quéré, C. et al., 2018: Global Carbon Budget 2017. ''Earth System Science Data'' , '''10(1)''' , 405–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r97">Le Quéré, C. et al., 2018: Global Carbon Budget 2017. ''Earth System Science Data'' , '''10(1)''' , 405–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r98">Peters, G.P., 2016: The ‘best available science’ to inform 1.5°C policy choices. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(7)''' , 646–649, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3000 10.1038/nclimate3000] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016b: Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868 10.1038/nclimate2868] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r99">Collins, M. et al., 2013: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1029–1136.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r100">Friedlingstein, P. et al., 2014a: Persistent growth of CO <sub>2</sub> emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''7(10)''' , 709–715, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 10.1038/ngeo2248] .</span> ----- Allen, M.R. et al., 2016: New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(5)''' , 1–5, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2998 10.1038/nclimate2998] . ----- Peters, G.P., 2016: The ‘best available science’ to inform 1.5°C policy choices. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(7)''' , 646–649, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3000 10.1038/nclimate3000] . ----- Allen, M.R. et al., 2018: A solution to the misrepresentations of CO <sub>2</sub> -equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation. ''npj Climate and Atmospheric Science'' , '''1(1)''' , 16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8 10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8] . ----- Smith, C.J. et al., 2018: FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. ''Geoscientific Model Development'' , '''11(6)''' , 2273–2297, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r101">IPCC, 2013b: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r102">IPCC, 2014a: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 151 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r103">Bowerman, N.H.A. et al., 2013: The role of short-lived climate pollutants in meeting temperature goals. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''3(12)''' , 1021–1024, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2034 10.1038/nclimate2034] .</span> ----- Collins, M. et al., 2013: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1029–1136. ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510. ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2014b: Disentangling the effects of CO <sub>2</sub> and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(46)''' , 16325–16330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415631111 10.1073/pnas.1415631111] . ----- Rogelj, J., M. Meinshausen, M. Schaeffer, R. Knutti, and K. Riahi, 2015a: Impact of short-lived non-CO <sub>2</sub> mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(7)''' , 075001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001 10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001] . ----- Tokarska, K.B., N.P. Gillett, V.K. Arora, W.G. Lee, and K. Zickfeld, 2018: The influence of non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings on cumulative carbon emissions budgets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(3)''' , 034039, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd 10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r104">Friedlingstein, P. et al., 2014a: Persistent growth of CO <sub>2</sub> emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''7(10)''' , 709–715, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 10.1038/ngeo2248] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r105">Rogelj, J. et al., 2016b: Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868 10.1038/nclimate2868] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r106">Stocker, T.F. et al., 2013: Technical Summary. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–115.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r107">Stocker, T.F. et al., 2013: Technical Summary. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–115.</span> ----- Friedlingstein, P. et al., 2014a: Persistent growth of CO <sub>2</sub> emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''7(10)''' , 709–715, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 10.1038/ngeo2248] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016b: Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868 10.1038/nclimate2868] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r108">Tokarska, K.B. and N.P. Gillett, 2018: Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5°C global warming. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 296–299, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9 10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r109">Peters, G.P., 2016: The ‘best available science’ to inform 1.5°C policy choices. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(7)''' , 646–649, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3000 10.1038/nclimate3000] .</span> ----- Matthews, H.D. et al., 2017: Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets. ''Current Climate Change Reports'' , '''3''' , 69–77, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0055-0 10.1007/s40641-017-0055-0] . ----- Millar, R.J. and P. Friedlingstein, 2018: The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160449, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0449 10.1098/rsta.2016.0449] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r110">Collins, M. et al., 2013: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1029–1136.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r111">Gillett, N.P., V.K. Arora, D. Matthews, and M.R. Allen, 2013: Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO <sub>2</sub> Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations. ''Journal of Climate'' , '''26(18)''' , 6844–6858, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00476.1 10.1175/jcli-d-12-00476.1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r112">Matthews, H.D., N.P. Gillett, P.A. Stott, and K. Zickfeld, 2009: The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. ''Nature'' , '''459(7248)''' , 829–832, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08047 10.1038/nature08047] .</span> ----- Gillett, N.P., V.K. Arora, D. Matthews, and M.R. Allen, 2013: Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO <sub>2</sub> Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations. ''Journal of Climate'' , '''26(18)''' , 6844–6858, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00476.1 10.1175/jcli-d-12-00476.1] . ----- Tachiiri, K., T. Hajima, and M. Kawamiya, 2015: Increase of uncertainty in transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions after stabilization of atmospheric CO <sub>2</sub> concentration. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(12)''' , 125018, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125018 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125018] . ----- Millar, R.J. and P. Friedlingstein, 2018: The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160449, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0449 10.1098/rsta.2016.0449] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r113">Stocker, T.F. et al., 2013: Technical Summary. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–115.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r114">Millar, R.J. and P. Friedlingstein, 2018: The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160449, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0449 10.1098/rsta.2016.0449] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r115">Lowe, J.A. et al., 2009: How difficult is it to recover from dangerous levels of global warming? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''4(1)''' , 014012, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014012 10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014012] .</span> ----- Frölicher, T.L. and F. Joos, 2010: Reversible and irreversible impacts of greenhouse gas emissions in multi-century projections with the NCAR global coupled carbon cycle-climate model. ''Climate Dynamics'' , '''35(7)''' , 1439–1459, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0727-0 10.1007/s00382-009-0727-0] . ----- Gillett, N.P., V.K. Arora, K. Zickfeld, S.J. Marshall, and W.J. Merryfield, 2011: Ongoing climate change following a complete cessation of carbon dioxide emissions. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''4(2)''' , 83–87, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1047 10.1038/ngeo1047] . ----- Matthews, H.D. and K. Zickfeld, 2012: Climate response to zeroed emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''2(5)''' , 338–341, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1424 10.1038/nclimate1424] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r116">Friedlingstein, P. et al., 2014b: Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. ''Journal of Climate'' , '''27(2)''' , 511–526, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00579.1 10.1175/jcli-d-12-00579.1] .</span> ----- MacDougall, A.H., K. Zickfeld, R. Knutti, and H.D. Matthews, 2015: Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(12)''' , 125003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003] . ----- Burke, E.J. et al., 2017: Quantifying uncertainties of permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''14(12)''' , 3051–3066, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3051-2017 10.5194/bg-14-3051-2017] . ----- Lowe, J.A. and D. Bernie, 2018: The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20170263, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0263 10.1098/rsta.2017.0263] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r117">Lowe, J.A. and D. Bernie, 2018: The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20170263, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0263 10.1098/rsta.2017.0263] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r118">Arneth, A. et al., 2010: Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''3(8)''' , 525–532, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo905 10.1038/ngeo905] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r119">Schädel, C. et al., 2014: Circumpolar assessment of permafrost C quality and its vulnerability over time using long-term incubation data. ''Global Change Biology'' , '''20(2)''' , 641–652, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12417 10.1111/gcb.12417] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r120">Burke, E.J. et al., 2017: Quantifying uncertainties of permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''14(12)''' , 3051–3066, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3051-2017 10.5194/bg-14-3051-2017] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r121">Comyn-Platt, E. et al., 2018: Carbon budgets for 1.5 and 2°C targets lowered by natural wetland and permafrost feedbacks. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''11(8)''' , 568–573, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0174-9 10.1038/s41561-018-0174-9] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r122">Mahowald, N.M. et al., 2017: Aerosol Deposition Impacts on Land and Ocean Carbon Cycles. ''Current Climate Change Reports'' , '''3(1)''' , 16–31, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0056-z 10.1007/s40641-017-0056-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r123">Le Quéré, C. et al., 2018: Global Carbon Budget 2017. ''Earth System Science Data'' , '''10(1)''' , 405–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r124">Le Quéré, C. et al., 2018: Global Carbon Budget 2017. ''Earth System Science Data'' , '''10(1)''' , 405–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r125">Herrington, T. and K. Zickfeld, 2014: Path independence of climate and carbon cycle response over a broad range of cumulative carbon emissions. ''Earth System Dynamics'' , '''5''' , 409–422, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-409-2014 10.5194/esd-5-409-2014] .</span> ----- Krasting, J.P., J.P. Dunne, E. Shevliakova, and R.J. Stouffer, 2014: Trajectory sensitivity of the transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''41(7)''' , 2520–2527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(issn)1944-8007 10.1002/(issn)1944-8007] . ----- Zickfeld, K., A.H. MacDougall, and H.D. Matthews, 2016: On the proportionality between global temperature change and cumulative CO <sub>2</sub> emissions during periods of net negative CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(5)''' , 055006, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055006 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055006] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r126">MacDougall, A.H., K. Zickfeld, R. Knutti, and H.D. Matthews, 2015: Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(12)''' , 125003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r127">MacDougall, A.H., K. Zickfeld, R. Knutti, and H.D. Matthews, 2015: Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO <sub>2</sub> forcings. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(12)''' , 125003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r128">Zickfeld, K., M. Eby, H.D. Matthews, and A.J. Weaver, 2009: Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''106(38)''' , 16129–16134, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805800106 10.1073/pnas.0805800106] .</span> ----- Collins, M. et al., 2013: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1029–1136.</li> <li><span id="fn:r129">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r130">Rogelj, J. et al., 2015b: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(6)''' , 519–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572 10.1038/nclimate2572] .</span> ----- Akimoto, K., F. Sano, and T. Tomoda, 2017: GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5°C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways. ''Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change'' , 1–14, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z 10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z] . ----- Löffler, K. et al., 2017: Designing a Model for the Global Energy System – GENeSYS-MOD: An Application of the Open-Source Energy Modeling System (OSeMOSYS). ''Energies'' , '''10(10)''' , 1468, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en10101468 10.3390/en10101468] . ----- Marcucci, A., S. Kypreos, and E. Panos, 2017: The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: Energy transition and the role of direct air capture. ''Climatic Change'' , '''144(2)''' , 181–193, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8 10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8] . ----- Su, X. et al., 2017: Emission pathways to achieve 2.0°C and 1.5°C climate targets. ''Earth’s Future'' , '''5(6)''' , 592–604, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016ef000492 10.1002/2016ef000492] . ----- Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] . ----- Bertram, C. et al., 2018: Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5°C mitigation scenarios. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064038, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec 10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec] . ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Liu, J.-Y. et al., 2018: Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5°C. ''Carbon Management'' , 1–11, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374 10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374] . ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- Strefler, J., T. Amann, N. Bauer, E. Kriegler, and J. Hartmann, 2018a: Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(3)''' , 034010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] . ----- Vrontisi, Z. et al., 2018: Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5°C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044039, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab53e 10.1088/1748-9326/aab53e] . ----- Zhang, R., S. Fujimori, and T. Hanaoka, 2018: The contribution of transport policies to the mitigation potential and cost of 2°C and 1.5°C goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(5)''' , 054008, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0d 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0d] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r131">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r132">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r133">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r134">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r135">Krey, V. et al., 2014b: Annex II: Metrics & Methodology. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1281–1328.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r136">Kriegler, E. et al., 2016: Will economic growth and fossil fuel scarcity help or hinder climate stabilization?: Overview of the RoSE multi-model study. ''Climatic Change'' , '''136(1)''' , 7–22, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1668-3 10.1007/s10584-016-1668-3] .</span> ----- Marangoni, G. et al., 2017: Sensitivity of projected long-term CO <sub>2</sub> emissions across the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(1)''' , 113–119, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3199 10.1038/nclimate3199] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r137">Bosetti, V. et al., 2015: Sensitivity to energy technology costs: A multi-model comparison analysis. ''Energy Policy'' , '''80''' , 244–263, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.012 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.012] .</span> ----- Creutzig, F. et al., 2017: The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. ''Nature Energy'' , '''2(9)''' , 17140, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 10.1038/nenergy.2017.140] . ----- Pietzcker, R.C. et al., 2017: System integration of wind and solar power in integrated assessment models: A cross-model evaluation of new approaches. ''Energy Economics'' , '''64''' , 583–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r138">van Sluisveld, M.A.E., S.H. Martínez, V. Daioglou, and D.P. van Vuuren, 2016: Exploring the implications of lifestyle change in 2°C mitigation scenarios using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''102''' , 309–319, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.013 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.013] .</span> ----- McCollum, D.L. et al., 2017: Improving the behavioral realism of global integrated assessment models: An application to consumers’ vehicle choices. ''Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment'' , '''55''' , 322–342, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.003 10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.003] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r139">Kriegler, E. et al., 2012: The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''22(4)''' , 807–822, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.005 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.005] .</span> ----- O’Neill, B.C. et al., 2014: A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. ''Climatic Change'' , '''122(3)''' , 387–400, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r140">O’Neill, B.C. et al., 2017: The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 169–180, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r141">Crespo Cuaresma, J., 2017: Income projections for climate change research: A framework based on human capital dynamics. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 226–236, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.012 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.012] .</span> ----- Dellink, R., J. Chateau, E. Lanzi, and B. Magné, 2017: Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 1–15, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.004] . ----- KC, S. and W. Lutz, 2017: The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 181–192, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004] . ----- Leimbach, M., E. Kriegler, N. Roming, and J. Schwanitz, 2017: Future growth patterns of world regions – A GDP scenario approach. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 215–225, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.005 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.005] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r142">Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r143">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r144">Lutz, W. and S. KC, 2011: Global Human Capital: Integrating Education and Population. ''Science'' , '''333(6042)''' , 587–592, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1206964 10.1126/science.1206964] .</span> ----- Snopkowski, K., M.C. Towner, M.K. Shenk, and H. Colleran, 2016: Pathways from education to fertility decline: a multi-site comparative study. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences'' , '''371(1692)''' , 20150156, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0156 10.1098/rstb.2015.0156] . ----- KC, S. and W. Lutz, 2017: The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 181–192, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r145">Crespo Cuaresma, J., 2017: Income projections for climate change research: A framework based on human capital dynamics. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 226–236, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.012 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.012] .</span> ----- Dellink, R., J. Chateau, E. Lanzi, and B. Magné, 2017: Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 1–15, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.004] . ----- Leimbach, M., E. Kriegler, N. Roming, and J. Schwanitz, 2017: Future growth patterns of world regions – A GDP scenario approach. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 215–225, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.005 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.005] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r146">Hsiang, S. et al., 2017: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. ''Science'' , '''356(6345)''' , 1362–1369, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4369 10.1126/science.aal4369] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r147">Kriegler, E. et al., 2016: Will economic growth and fossil fuel scarcity help or hinder climate stabilization?: Overview of the RoSE multi-model study. ''Climatic Change'' , '''136(1)''' , 7–22, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1668-3 10.1007/s10584-016-1668-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r148">Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r149">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r150">Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r151">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r152">O’Neill, B.C. et al., 2017: The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 169–180, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r153">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r154">Fujimori, S., 2017: SSP3: AIM Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 268–283, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r155">Kriegler, E. et al., 2017: Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 297–315, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r156">Fricko, O. et al., 2017: The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 251–267, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r157">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r158">Bertram, C. et al., 2018: Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5°C mitigation scenarios. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064038, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec 10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec] .</span> ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Liu, J.-Y. et al., 2018: Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5°C. ''Carbon Management'' , 1–11, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374 10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r159">Krey, V., G. Luderer, L. Clarke, and E. Kriegler, 2014a: Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123''' , 369–382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5 10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5] .</span> ----- Krey, V. et al., 2014b: Annex II: Metrics & Methodology. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1281–1328.</li> <li><span id="fn:r160">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r161">Creutzig, F. et al., 2017: The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. ''Nature Energy'' , '''2(9)''' , 17140, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 10.1038/nenergy.2017.140] .</span> ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2017: Assessment of wind and solar power in global low-carbon energy scenarios: An introduction. ''Energy Economics'' , '''64''' , 542–551, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.027 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.027] . ----- Pietzcker, R.C. et al., 2017: System integration of wind and solar power in integrated assessment models: A cross-model evaluation of new approaches. ''Energy Economics'' , '''64''' , 583–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r162">van Sluisveld, M.A.E., S.H. Martínez, V. Daioglou, and D.P. van Vuuren, 2016: Exploring the implications of lifestyle change in 2°C mitigation scenarios using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''102''' , 309–319, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.013 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.013] .</span> ----- McCollum, D.L. et al., 2017: Improving the behavioral realism of global integrated assessment models: An application to consumers’ vehicle choices. ''Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment'' , '''55''' , 322–342, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.003 10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.003] . ----- Weindl, I. et al., 2017: Livestock and human use of land: Productivity trends and dietary choices as drivers of future land and carbon dynamics. ''Global and Planetary Change'' , '''159''' , 1–10, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r163">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r164">Minx, J.C., W.F. Lamb, M.W. Callaghan, L. Bornmann, and S. Fuss, 2017: Fast growing research on negative emissions. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(3)''' , 035007, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ee5 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ee5] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r165">Chen, C. and M. Tavoni, 2013: Direct air capture of CO <sub>2</sub> and climate stabilization: A model based assessment. ''Climatic Change'' , '''118(1)''' , 59–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0714-7 10.1007/s10584-013-0714-7] .</span> ----- Marcucci, A., S. Kypreos, and E. Panos, 2017: The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: Energy transition and the role of direct air capture. ''Climatic Change'' , '''144(2)''' , 181–193, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8 10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r166">Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</span> ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Liu, J.-Y. et al., 2018: Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5°C. ''Carbon Management'' , 1–11, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374 10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r167">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r168">Breyer, C. et al., 2017: On the role of solar photovoltaics in global energy transition scenarios. ''Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications'' , '''25(8)''' , 727–745, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.2885 10.1002/pip.2885] .</span> ----- Jacobson, M.Z., 2017: Roadmaps to Transition Countries to 100% Clean, Renewable Energy for All Purposes to Curtail Global Warming, Air Pollution, and Energy Risk. ''Earth’s Future'' , '''5(10)''' , 948–952, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000672 10.1002/2017ef000672] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r169">Brynolf, S., M. Taljegard, M. Grahn, and J. Hansson, 2018: Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs. ''Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews'' , '''81''' , 1887–1905, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.288 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.288] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r170">Zeman, F.S. and D.W. Keith, 2008: Carbon Neutral Hydrocarbons. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''366(1882)''' , 3901–3918, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0143 10.1098/rsta.2008.0143] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r171">Williams, P.J. and L.M.L. Laurens, 2010: Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks: Review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics. ''Energy & Environmental Science'' , '''3(5)''' , 554–590, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b924978h 10.1039/b924978h] .</span> ----- Walsh, M.J. et al., 2016: Algal food and fuel coproduction can mitigate greenhouse gas emissions while improving land and water-use efficiency. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(11)''' , 114006, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114006 10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114006] . ----- Greene, C.H. et al., 2017: Geoengineering, marine microalgae, and climate stabilization in the 21st century. ''Earth’s Future'' , '''5(3)''' , 278–284, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016ef000486 10.1002/2016ef000486] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r172">Joshi, V. and S. Kumar, 2015: Meat Analogues: Plant based alternatives to meat products – A review. ''International Journal of Food Fermentation and Technology'' , '''5(2)''' , 107–119, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2277-9396.2016.00001.5 10.5958/2277-9396.2016.00001.5] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r173">Post, M.J., 2012: Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospects. ''Meat Science'' , '''92(3)''' , 297–301, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r174">Tuomisto, H.L. and M.J. Teixeira de Mattos, 2011: Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production. ''Environmental Science & Technology'' , '''45(14)''' , 6117–6123, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es200130u 10.1021/es200130u] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r175">Madeira, M.S. et al., 2017: Microalgae as feed ingredients for livestock production and meat quality: A review. ''Livestock Science'' , '''205''' , 111–121, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.09.020 10.1016/j.livsci.2017.09.020] .</span> ----- Pikaar, I. et al., 2018: Decoupling Livestock from Land Use through Industrial Feed Production Pathways. ''Environmental Science & Technology'' , '''52(13)''' , 7351–7359, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00216 10.1021/acs.est.8b00216] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r176">Wedlock, D.N., P.H. Janssen, S.C. Leahy, D. Shu, and B.M. Buddle, 2013: Progress in the development of vaccines against rumen methanogens. ''Animal'' , '''7(s2)''' , 244–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1751731113000682 10.1017/s1751731113000682] .</span> ----- Hristov, A.N. et al., 2015: An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''112(34)''' , 10663–8, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504124112 10.1073/pnas.1504124112] . ----- Herrero, M. et al., 2016: Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(5)''' , 452–461, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2925 10.1038/nclimate2925] . ----- Subharat, S. et al., 2016: Vaccination of Sheep with a Methanogen Protein Provides Insight into Levels of Antibody in Saliva Needed to Target Ruminal Methanogens. ''PLOS ONE'' , '''11(7)''' , e0159861, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159861 10.1371/journal.pone.0159861] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r177">Subbarao, G. et al., 2013: Potential for biological nitrification inhibition to reduce nitrification and N <sub>2</sub> O emissions in pasture crop–livestock systems. ''Animal'' , '''7(s2)''' , 322–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1751731113000761 10.1017/s1751731113000761] .</span> ----- Di, H.J. and K. Cameron, 2016: Inhibition of nitrification to mitigate nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions in grazed grassland: A review. ''Journal of Soils and Sediments'' , '''16''' , 1401–1420, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1403-8 10.1007/s11368-016-1403-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r178">Paustian, K. et al., 2016: Climate-smart soils. ''Nature'' , '''532(7597)''' , 49–57, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17174 10.1038/nature17174] .</span> ----- Frank, S. et al., 2017: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(10)''' , 105004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83] . ----- Zomer, R.J., D.A. Bossio, R. Sommer, and L.V. Verchot, 2017: Global Sequestration Potential of Increased Organic Carbon in Cropland Soils. ''Scientific Reports'' , '''7(1)''' , 15554, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15794-8 10.1038/s41598-017-15794-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r179">Griscom, B.W. et al., 2017: Natural climate solutions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(44)''' , 11645–11650, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114 10.1073/pnas.1710465114] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r180">Mazzotti, M. et al., 2005: Mineral carbonation and industrial uses of carbon dioxide. In: ''IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage'' [Metz, B., O. Davidson, H.C. de Coninck, M. Loos, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 319–338.</span> ----- Hartmann, J. et al., 2013: Enhanced chemical weathering as a geoengineering strategy to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, supply nutrients, and mitigate ocean acidification. ''Reviews of Geophysics'' , '''51(2)''' , 113–149, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rog.20004 10.1002/rog.20004] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r181">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, A. Reisinger, M. Meinshausen, and K. Riahi, 2013b: Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. ''Nature'' , '''493(7430)''' , 79–83, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11787 10.1038/nature11787] . ----- Bertram, C. et al., 2015b: Complementing carbon prices with technology policies to keep climate targets within reach. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(3)''' , 235–239, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2514 10.1038/nclimate2514] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Michaelowa, A., M. Allen, and F. Sha, 2018: Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 275–286, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r182">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] .</span> ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] . ----- McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r183">Kriegler, E. et al., 2014a: A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions. ''Climatic Change'' , '''122(3)''' , 401–414, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5 10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r184">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r185">Bertram, C. et al., 2018: Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5°C mitigation scenarios. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064038, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec 10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r186">Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</span> ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018b: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457] . ----- Liu, J.-Y. et al., 2018: Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5°C. ''Carbon Management'' , 1–11, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374 10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374] . ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] . ----- Zhang, R., S. Fujimori, and T. Hanaoka, 2018: The contribution of transport policies to the mitigation potential and cost of 2°C and 1.5°C goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(5)''' , 054008, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0d 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0d] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r187">Akimoto, K., F. Sano, and T. Tomoda, 2017: GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5°C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways. ''Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change'' , 1–14, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z 10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r188">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r189">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r190">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span> ----- Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r191">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r192">Gernaat, D.E.H.J. et al., 2015: Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''33''' , 142–153, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r193">Jackson, R.B. et al., 2017: Warning signs for stabilizing global CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(11)''' , 110202, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9662 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9662] .</span> ----- Le Quéré, C. et al., 2018: Global Carbon Budget 2017. ''Earth System Science Data'' , '''10(1)''' , 405–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r194">Davis, S.J. and K. Caldeira, 2010: Consumption-based accounting of CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''107(12)''' , 5687–92, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906974107 10.1073/pnas.0906974107] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r195">González-Eguino, M., A. Olabe, and T. Ribera, 2017: New Coal-Fired Plants Jeopardise Paris Agreement. ''Sustainability'' , '''9(2)''' , 168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9020168 10.3390/su9020168] .</span> ----- Edenhofer, O., J.C. Steckel, M. Jakob, and C. Bertram, 2018: Reports of coal’s terminal decline may be exaggerated. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(2)''' , 024019, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa3a2 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa3a2] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r196">Shearer, C., N. Mathew-Shah, L. Myllyvirta, A. Yu, and T. Nace, 2018: ''Boom and Bust 2018: Tracking the Global Coal Plant Pipeline'' . CoalSwarm, Greenpeace USA, and Sierra Club, 16 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r197">Rogelj, J. et al., 2016a: Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. ''Nature'' , '''534(7609)''' , 631–639, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18307 10.1038/nature18307] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r198">Fawcett, A.A. et al., 2015: Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? ''Science'' , '''350(6265)''' , 1168–1169, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5761 10.1126/science.aad5761] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016a: Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. ''Nature'' , '''534(7609)''' , 631–639, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18307 10.1038/nature18307] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r199">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r200">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018b: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r201">Grassi, G. et al., 2017: The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(3)''' , 220–226, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3227 10.1038/nclimate3227] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r202">Rockström, J. et al., 2017: A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. ''Science'' , '''355(6331)''' , 1269–1271, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443 10.1126/science.aah3443] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r203">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018b: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r204">Sanderson, B.M., B.C. O’Neill, and C. Tebaldi, 2016: What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets? ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''43(13)''' , 7133–7142, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016gl069563 10.1002/2016gl069563] .</span> ----- Ricke, K.L., R.J. Millar, and D.G. MacMartin, 2017: Constraints on global temperature target overshoot. ''Scientific Reports'' , '''7(1)''' , 1–7, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9 10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r205">Fuss, S. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063002, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r206">Nemet, G.F. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 3: Innovation and upscaling. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4 10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r207">Smith, P. et al., 2015: Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(1)''' , 42–50, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870 10.1038/nclimate2870] .</span> ----- Fuss, S. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063002, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r208">Fuss, S. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063002, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f] .</span> ----- Minx, J.C. et al., 2018: Negative emissions-Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b] . ----- Nemet, G.F. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 3: Innovation and upscaling. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4 10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r209">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018b: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r210">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- UNEP, 2016: ''The Emissions Gap Report 2016: A UNEP Synthesis Report'' . United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya, 85 pp. ----- UNFCCC, 2016: ''Aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: an update'' . FCCC/CP/2016/2, The Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Bonn, Germany, 75 pp. ----- UNEP, 2017: ''The Emissions Gap Report 2017: A UN Environment Synthesis Report'' . United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya, 116 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r211">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, A. Reisinger, M. Meinshausen, and K. Riahi, 2013b: Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. ''Nature'' , '''493(7430)''' , 79–83, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11787 10.1038/nature11787] . ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510. ----- Fawcett, A.A. et al., 2015: Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? ''Science'' , '''350(6265)''' , 1168–1169, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5761 10.1126/science.aad5761] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2015: Locked into Copenhagen pledges – Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 8–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r212">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span> ----- Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r213">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, B.C. O’Neill, and K. Riahi, 2013a: 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''3(4)''' , 405–412, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1758 10.1038/nclimate1758] . ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510. ----- Krey, V., G. Luderer, L. Clarke, and E. Kriegler, 2014a: Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123''' , 369–382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5 10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r214">Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r215">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r216">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r217">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Gernaat, D.E.H.J. et al., 2015: Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''33''' , 142–153, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r218">Rogelj, J. et al., 2015b: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(6)''' , 519–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572 10.1038/nclimate2572] .</span> ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r219">Myhre, G. et al., 2013: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 659–740.</span> ----- Blanco, G. et al., 2014: Drivers, Trends and Mitigation. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 351–412.</li> <li><span id="fn:r220">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r221">Marangoni, G. et al., 2017: Sensitivity of projected long-term CO <sub>2</sub> emissions across the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(1)''' , 113–119, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3199 10.1038/nclimate3199] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r222">Gernaat, D.E.H.J. et al., 2015: Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''33''' , 142–153, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r223">Bodirsky, B.L. et al., 2014: Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. ''Nature Communications'' , '''5''' , 3858, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4858 10.1038/ncomms4858] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r224">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r225">Bodirsky, B.L. et al., 2012: N <sub>2</sub> O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle-current state and future scenarios. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''9(10)''' , 4169–4197, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4169-2012 10.5194/bg-9-4169-2012] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r226">IPCC, 2014b: Summary for Policymakers. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadne, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–30.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r227">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r228">Shindell, D.T. and G. Faluvegi, 2010: The net climate impact of coal-fired power plant emissions. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''10(7)''' , 3247–3260, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3247-2010 10.5194/acp-10-3247-2010] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r229">Fuglestvedt, J.S. et al., 2010: Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics. ''Atmospheric Environment'' , '''44(37)''' , 4648–4677, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.044 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.044] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r230">Rogelj, J. et al., 2014b: Disentangling the effects of CO <sub>2</sub> and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(46)''' , 16325–16330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415631111 10.1073/pnas.1415631111] .</span> ----- Shindell, D.T., Y. Lee, and G. Faluvegi, 2016: Climate and health impacts of US emissions reductions consistent with 2°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(5)''' , 503–507, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2935 10.1038/nclimate2935] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r231">Myhre, G. et al., 2013: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 659–740.</span> ----- Etminan, M., G. Myhre, E.J. Highwood, and K.P. Shine, 2016: Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''43(24)''' , 12,614–12,623, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016gl071930 10.1002/2016gl071930] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r232">Gernaat, D.E.H.J. et al., 2015: Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''33''' , 142–153, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r233">Shindell, D.T. et al., 2012: Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security. ''Science'' , '''335(6065)''' , 183–189, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026 10.1126/science.1210026] .</span> ----- Stohl, A. et al., 2015: Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''15(18)''' , 10529–10566, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015 10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r234">Samset, B.H. et al., 2018: Climate impacts from a removal of anthropogenic aerosol emissions. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''45(2)''' , 1020–1029, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076079 10.1002/2017gl076079] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r235">Shindell, D.T. et al., 2012: Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security. ''Science'' , '''335(6065)''' , 183–189, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026 10.1126/science.1210026] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r236">Bond, T.C. et al., 2013: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. ''Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres'' , '''118(11)''' , 5380–5552, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171 10.1002/jgrd.50171] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r237">Stohl, A. et al., 2015: Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''15(18)''' , 10529–10566, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015 10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015] .</span> ----- Klimont, Z. et al., 2017: Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''17(14)''' , 8681–8723, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017 10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r238">Sand, M. et al., 2015: Response of Arctic temperature to changes in emissions of short-lived climate forcers. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(3)''' , 286–289, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2880 10.1038/nclimate2880] .</span> ----- Stohl, A. et al., 2015: Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''15(18)''' , 10529–10566, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015 10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r239">Le Quéré, C. et al., 2018: Global Carbon Budget 2017. ''Earth System Science Data'' , '''10(1)''' , 405–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r240">Grassi, G. et al., 2017: The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(3)''' , 220–226, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3227 10.1038/nclimate3227] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r241">IPCC, 2014b: Summary for Policymakers. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadne, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–30.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r242">IPCC/TEAP, 2005: Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System: Issues Related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons. [Metz, B., L. Kuijpers, S. Solomon, S.O. Andersen, O. Davidson, J. Pons, D. Jager, T. Kestin, M. Manning, and L. Meyer (eds.)]. A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 485 pp.</span> ----- US EPA, 2013: ''Global Mitigation of Non-CO <sub>2</sub> Greenhouse Gases: 2010–2030. Report No. EPA-430-R-13-011'' . United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Washington DC, USA, 410 pp. ----- Velders, G.J.M., D.W. Fahey, J.S. Daniel, S.O. Andersen, and M. McFarland, 2015: Future atmospheric abundances and climate forcings from scenarios of global and regional hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions. ''Atmospheric Environment'' , '''123''' , 200–209, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.071 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.071] . ----- Purohit, P. and L. Höglund-Isaksson, 2017: Global emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases 2005–2050 with abatement potentials and costs. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''17(4)''' , 2795–2816, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2795-2017 10.5194/acp-17-2795-2017] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r243">Velders, G.J.M., D.W. Fahey, J.S. Daniel, S.O. Andersen, and M. McFarland, 2015: Future atmospheric abundances and climate forcings from scenarios of global and regional hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions. ''Atmospheric Environment'' , '''123''' , 200–209, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.071 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.071] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r244">Höglund-Isaksson, L. et al., 2017: Cost estimates of the Kigali Amendment to phase-down hydrofluorocarbons. ''Environmental Science & Policy'' , '''75''' , 138–147, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.006 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.006] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r245">Höglund-Isaksson, L. et al., 2017: Cost estimates of the Kigali Amendment to phase-down hydrofluorocarbons. ''Environmental Science & Policy'' , '''75''' , 138–147, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.006 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.006] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r246">Höglund-Isaksson, L. et al., 2017: Cost estimates of the Kigali Amendment to phase-down hydrofluorocarbons. ''Environmental Science & Policy'' , '''75''' , 138–147, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.006 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.006] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r247">Rose, S.K. et al., 2014b: Non-Kyoto radiative forcing in long-run greenhouse gas emissions and climate change scenarios. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 511–525, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0955-5 10.1007/s10584-013-0955-5] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r248">Smith, C.J. et al., 2018: FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. ''Geoscientific Model Development'' , '''11(6)''' , 2273–2297, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r249">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r250">Fuss, S. et al., 2014: Betting on negative emissions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''4(10)''' , 850–853, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392 10.1038/nclimate2392] .</span> ----- Anderson, K. and G. Peters, 2016: The trouble with negative emissions. ''Science'' , '''354(6309)''' , 182–183, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4567 10.1126/science.aah4567] . ----- Williamson, P., 2016: Emissions reduction: Scrutinize CO <sub>2</sub> removal methods. ''Nature'' , '''530(153)''' , 153–155, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/530153a 10.1038/530153a] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P., A.F. Hof, M.A.E. van Sluisveld, and K. Riahi, 2017a: Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed. ''Nature Energy'' , '''2(12)''' , 902–904, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2 10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2] . ----- Obersteiner, M. et al., 2018: How to spend a dwindling greenhouse gas budget. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(1)''' , 7–10, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1 10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r251">Smith, P. et al., 2015: Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(1)''' , 42–50, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870 10.1038/nclimate2870] .</span> ----- Dooley, K. and S. Kartha, 2018: Land-based negative emissions: risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development. ''International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics'' , '''18(1)''' , 79–98, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9382-9 10.1007/s10784-017-9382-9] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r252">Minx, J.C., W.F. Lamb, M.W. Callaghan, L. Bornmann, and S. Fuss, 2017: Fast growing research on negative emissions. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(3)''' , 035007, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ee5 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ee5] .</span> ----- Fuss, S. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063002, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f] . ----- Minx, J.C. et al., 2018: Negative emissions-Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b] . ----- Nemet, G.F. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 3: Innovation and upscaling. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4 10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r253">Minx, J.C. et al., 2018: Negative emissions-Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r254">Canadell, J.G. and M.R. Raupach, 2008: Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation. ''Science'' , '''320(5882)''' , 1456–1457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1155458 10.1126/science.1155458] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r255">Paustian, K. et al., 2016: Climate-smart soils. ''Nature'' , '''532(7597)''' , 49–57, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17174 10.1038/nature17174] .</span> ----- Frank, S. et al., 2017: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(10)''' , 105004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83] . ----- Zomer, R.J., D.A. Bossio, R. Sommer, and L.V. Verchot, 2017: Global Sequestration Potential of Increased Organic Carbon in Cropland Soils. ''Scientific Reports'' , '''7(1)''' , 15554, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15794-8 10.1038/s41598-017-15794-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r256">Griscom, B.W. et al., 2017: Natural climate solutions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(44)''' , 11645–11650, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114 10.1073/pnas.1710465114] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r257">McLeod, E. et al., 2011: A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO <sub>2</sub> . ''Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment'' , '''9(10)''' , 552–560, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1890/110004 10.1890/110004] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r258">Woolf, D., J.E. Amonette, F.A. Street-Perrott, J. Lehmann, and S. Joseph, 2010: Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. ''Nature Communications'' , '''1(5)''' , 1–9, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053 10.1038/ncomms1053] .</span> ----- Smith, P., 2016: Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. ''Global Change Biology'' , '''22(3)''' , 1315–1324, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13178 10.1111/gcb.13178] . ----- Werner, C., H.-P. Schmidt, D. Gerten, W. Lucht, and C. Kammann, 2018: Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5°C. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044036, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r259">Obersteiner, M. et al., 2001: Managing Climate Risk. ''Science'' , '''294(5543)''' , 786–787, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.294.5543.786b 10.1126/science.294.5543.786b] .</span> ----- Keith, D.W. and J.S. Rhodes, 2002: Bury, Burn or Both: A Two-for-One Deal on Biomass Carbon and Energy. ''Climatic Change'' , '''54(3)''' , 375–377, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1016187420442 10.1023/a:1016187420442] . ----- Gough, C. and P. Upham, 2011: Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS or Bio-CCS). ''Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology'' , '''1(4)''' , 324–334, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ghg.34 10.1002/ghg.34] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r260">Zeman, F.S. and K. Lackner, 2004: Capturing Carbon Dioxide directly from the Atmosphere. ''World Resource Review'' , '''16(2)''' , 157–172.</span> ----- Keith, D.W., M. Ha-Duong, and J.K. Stolaroff, 2006: Climate Strategy with CO <sub>2</sub> Capture from the Air. ''Climatic Change'' , '''74(1–3)''' , 17–45, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-9026-x 10.1007/s10584-005-9026-x] . ----- Socolow, R. et al., 2011: ''Direct Air Capture of CO <sub>2</sub> with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs'' . American Physical Society (APS), College Park, MD, USA, 100 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r261">Mazzotti, M. et al., 2005: Mineral carbonation and industrial uses of carbon dioxide. In: ''IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage'' [Metz, B., O. Davidson, H.C. de Coninck, M. Loos, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 319–338.</span> ----- Matter, J.M. et al., 2016: Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. ''Science'' , '''352(6291)''' , 1312–1314, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8132 10.1126/science.aad8132] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r262">Schuiling, R.D. and P. Krijgsman, 2006: Enhanced Weathering: An Effective and Cheap Tool to Sequester CO <sub>2</sub> . ''Climatic Change'' , '''74(1–3)''' , 349–354, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-3485-y 10.1007/s10584-005-3485-y] .</span> ----- Hartmann, J. et al., 2013: Enhanced chemical weathering as a geoengineering strategy to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, supply nutrients, and mitigate ocean acidification. ''Reviews of Geophysics'' , '''51(2)''' , 113–149, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rog.20004 10.1002/rog.20004] . ----- Strefler, J., T. Amann, N. Bauer, E. Kriegler, and J. Hartmann, 2018a: Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(3)''' , 034010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r263">Kheshgi, H.S., 1995: Sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide by increasing ocean alkalinity. ''Energy'' , '''20(9)''' , 915–922, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(95)00035-f 10.1016/0360-5442(95)00035-f] .</span> ----- Rau, G.H., 2011: CO <sub>2</sub> Mitigation via Capture and Chemical Conversion in Seawater. ''Environmental Science & Technology'' , '''45(3)''' , 1088–1092, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es102671x 10.1021/es102671x] . ----- Ilyina, T., D. Wolf-Gladrow, G. Munhoven, and C. Heinze, 2013: Assessing the potential of calcium-based artificial ocean alkalinization to mitigate rising atmospheric CO <sub>2</sub> and ocean acidification. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''40(22)''' , 5909–5914, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013gl057981 10.1002/2013gl057981] . ----- Lenton, A., R.J. Matear, D.P. Keller, V. Scott, and N.E. Vaughan, 2018: Assessing carbon dioxide removal through global and regional ocean alkalinization under high and low emission pathways. ''Earth System Dynamics'' , '''9(2)''' , 339–357, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-339-2018 10.5194/esd-9-339-2018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r264">The Royal Society, 2009: ''Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty'' . RS Policy document 10/09, The Royal Society, London, UK, 82 pp.</span> ----- Smith, P. et al., 2015: Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(1)''' , 42–50, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870 10.1038/nclimate2870] . ----- Psarras, P. et al., 2017: Slicing the pie: how big could carbon dioxide removal be? ''Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment'' , '''6(5)''' , e253, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wene.253 10.1002/wene.253] . ----- Fuss, S. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063002, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r265">Boucher, O. and G.A. Folberth, 2010: New Directions: Atmospheric methane removal as a way to mitigate climate change? ''Atmospheric Environment'' , '''44(27)''' , 3343–3345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.032 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.032] .</span> ----- de Richter, R., T. Ming, P. Davies, W. Liu, and S. Caillol, 2017: Removal of non-CO <sub>2</sub> greenhouse gases by large-scale atmospheric solar photocatalysis. ''Progress in Energy and Combustion Science'' , '''60''' , 68–96, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.01.001 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.01.001] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r266">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r267">Chen, C. and M. Tavoni, 2013: Direct air capture of CO <sub>2</sub> and climate stabilization: A model based assessment. ''Climatic Change'' , '''118(1)''' , 59–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0714-7 10.1007/s10584-013-0714-7] .</span> ----- Marcucci, A., S. Kypreos, and E. Panos, 2017: The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: Energy transition and the role of direct air capture. ''Climatic Change'' , '''144(2)''' , 181–193, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8 10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8] . ----- Lehtilä, A. and T. Koljonen, 2018: Pathways to Post-fossil Economy in a Well Below 2℃ World. In: ''Limiting Global Warming to Well Below 2℃: Energy System Modelling and Policy Development'' [Giannakidis, G., K. Karlsson, M. Labriet, and B. Gallachóir (eds.)]. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 33–49, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_3 10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_3] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r268">Frank, S. et al., 2017: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(10)''' , 105004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r269">Erb, K.-H. et al., 2018: Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass. ''Nature'' , '''553''' , 73–76, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature25138 10.1038/nature25138] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r270">Griscom, B.W. et al., 2017: Natural climate solutions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(44)''' , 11645–11650, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114 10.1073/pnas.1710465114] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r271">Kriegler, E. et al., 2017: Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 297–315, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r272">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r273">Haberl, H. et al., 2011: Global bioenergy potentials from agricultural land in 2050: Sensitivity to climate change, diets and yields. ''Biomass and Bioenergy'' , '''35(12)''' , 4753–4769, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.035 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.035] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r274">Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r275">Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r276">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r277">van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r278">Marcucci, A., S. Kypreos, and E. Panos, 2017: The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: Energy transition and the role of direct air capture. ''Climatic Change'' , '''144(2)''' , 181–193, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8 10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8] .</span> ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Lehtilä, A. and T. Koljonen, 2018: Pathways to Post-fossil Economy in a Well Below 2℃ World. In: ''Limiting Global Warming to Well Below 2℃: Energy System Modelling and Policy Development'' [Giannakidis, G., K. Karlsson, M. Labriet, and B. Gallachóir (eds.)]. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 33–49, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_3 10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_3] . ----- Liu, J.-Y. et al., 2018: Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5°C. ''Carbon Management'' , 1–11, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374 10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r279">Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] .</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r280">Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r281">Krey, V., G. Luderer, L. Clarke, and E. Kriegler, 2014a: Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123''' , 369–382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5 10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5] .</span> ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r282">Popp, A. et al., 2014b: Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: Model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 495–509, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0926-x 10.1007/s10584-013-0926-x] .</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r283">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018b: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457] .</span> ----- Obersteiner, M. et al., 2018: How to spend a dwindling greenhouse gas budget. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(1)''' , 7–10, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1 10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r284">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r285">Honegger, M. and D. Reiner, 2018: The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design. ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 306–321, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1413322 10.1080/14693062.2017.1413322] .</span> ----- Nemet, G.F. et al., 2018: Negative emissions – Part 3: Innovation and upscaling. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 063003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4 10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r286">Geden, O., 2015: Policy: Climate advisers must maintain integrity. ''Nature'' , '''521(7550)''' , 27–28, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/521027a 10.1038/521027a] .</span> ----- Anderson, K. and G. Peters, 2016: The trouble with negative emissions. ''Science'' , '''354(6309)''' , 182–183, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4567 10.1126/science.aah4567] . ----- Dooley, K. and S. Kartha, 2018: Land-based negative emissions: risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development. ''International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics'' , '''18(1)''' , 79–98, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9382-9 10.1007/s10784-017-9382-9] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r287">Krey, V., G. Luderer, L. Clarke, and E. Kriegler, 2014a: Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123''' , 369–382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5 10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5] .</span> ----- Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r288">UNEP, 2017: ''The Emissions Gap Report 2017: A UN Environment Synthesis Report'' . United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya, 116 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r289">Fuss, S. et al., 2014: Betting on negative emissions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''4(10)''' , 850–853, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392 10.1038/nclimate2392] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P., A.F. Hof, M.A.E. van Sluisveld, and K. Riahi, 2017a: Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed. ''Nature Energy'' , '''2(12)''' , 902–904, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2 10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r290">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r291">Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r292">Klein, D. et al., 2014: The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: An assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 705–718, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0940-z 10.1007/s10584-013-0940-z] .</span> ----- Krey, V., G. Luderer, L. Clarke, and E. Kriegler, 2014a: Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123''' , 369–382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5 10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5] . ----- Rose, S.K. et al., 2014a: Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 477–493, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3 10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3] . ----- Bauer, N. et al., 2017: Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 316–330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006] . ----- Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r293">Kriegler, E., O. Edenhofer, L. Reuster, G. Luderer, and D. Klein, 2013a: Is atmospheric carbon dioxide removal a game changer for climate change mitigation? ''Climatic Change'' , '''118(1)''' , 45–57, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0681-4 10.1007/s10584-012-0681-4] .</span> ----- Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r294">Rose, S.K. et al., 2014a: Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 477–493, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3 10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r295">Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r296">Calvin, K. et al., 2014: Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 691–704, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y 10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y] .</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r297">Kraxner, F. et al., 2013: Global bioenergy scenarios – Future forest development, land-use implications, and trade-offs. ''Biomass and Bioenergy'' , '''57''' , 86–96, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.003 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.003] .</span> ----- Bodirsky, B.L. et al., 2014: Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. ''Nature Communications'' , '''5''' , 3858, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4858 10.1038/ncomms4858] . ----- Bonsch, M. et al., 2014: Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production. ''GCB Bioenergy'' , '''8(1)''' , 11–24, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12226 10.1111/gcbb.12226] . ----- Obersteiner, M. et al., 2016: Assessing the land resource–food price nexus of the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Science Advances'' , '''2(9)''' , e1501499, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501499 10.1126/sciadv.1501499] . ----- Humpenöder, F. et al., 2018: Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(2)''' , 024011, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r298">Frank, S. et al., 2017: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(10)''' , 105004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r299">Haberl, H. et al., 2013: Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 031004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004] .</span> ----- Erb, K.-H. et al., 2016b: Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. ''Nature Communications'' , '''7''' , 11382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11382 10.1038/ncomms11382] . ----- Obersteiner, M. et al., 2016: Assessing the land resource–food price nexus of the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Science Advances'' , '''2(9)''' , e1501499, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501499 10.1126/sciadv.1501499] . ----- Humpenöder, F. et al., 2018: Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(2)''' , 024011, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r300">Calvin, K. et al., 2014: Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 691–704, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y 10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y] .</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2014a: Land-use protection for climate change mitigation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''4(12)''' , 1095–1098, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2444 10.1038/nclimate2444] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r301">Williamson, P. and R. Bodle, 2016: ''Update on Climate Geoengineering in Relation to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Potential Impacts and Regulatory Framework'' . CBD Technical Series No. 84, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, QC, Canada, 158 pp.</span> ----- Boysen, L.R. et al., 2017b: The limits to global-warming mitigation by terrestrial carbon removal. ''Earth’s Future'' , '''5(5)''' , 463–474, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016ef000469 10.1002/2016ef000469] . ----- Dooley, K. and S. Kartha, 2018: Land-based negative emissions: risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development. ''International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics'' , '''18(1)''' , 79–98, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9382-9 10.1007/s10784-017-9382-9] . ----- Heck, V., D. Gerten, W. Lucht, and A. Popp, 2018: Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(2)''' , 151–155, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y 10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r302">Fuss, S. et al., 2016: Research priorities for negative emissions. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(11)''' , 115007, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/115007 10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/115007] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r303">van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2015: Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''98''' , 303–323, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.005 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.005] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r304">Bertram, C. et al., 2018: Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5°C mitigation scenarios. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064038, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec 10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec] .</span> ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r305">Bertram, C. et al., 2018: Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5°C mitigation scenarios. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064038, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec 10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r306">Smith, P. et al., 2015: Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(1)''' , 42–50, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870 10.1038/nclimate2870] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r307">Smith, L.J. and M.S. Torn, 2013: Ecological limits to terrestrial biological carbon dioxide removal. ''Climatic Change'' , '''118(1)''' , 89–103, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0682-3 10.1007/s10584-012-0682-3] .</span> ----- Boysen, L.R., W. Lucht, D. Gerten, and V. Heck, 2016: Impacts devalue the potential of large-scale terrestrial CO <sub>2</sub> removal through biomass plantations. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(9)''' , 1–10, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095010 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095010] . ----- Heck, V., D. Gerten, W. Lucht, and L.R. Boysen, 2016: Is extensive terrestrial carbon dioxide removal a ‘green’ form of geoengineering? A global modelling study. ''Global and Planetary Change'' , '''137''' , 123–130, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.12.008 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.12.008] . ----- Krause, A. et al., 2017: Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators. ''Biogeosciences'' , '''14(21)''' , 4829–4850, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4829-2017 10.5194/bg-14-4829-2017] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r308">Creutzig, F. et al., 2012: Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''2(5)''' , 320–327, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1416 10.1038/nclimate1416] .</span> ----- Calvin, K. et al., 2014: Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 691–704, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y 10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y] . ----- Popp, A. et al., 2014b: Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: Model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 495–509, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0926-x 10.1007/s10584-013-0926-x] . ----- Creutzig, F. et al., 2015: Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. ''GCB Bioenergy'' , '''7(5)''' , 916–944, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12205 10.1111/gcbb.12205] . ----- Kreidenweis, U. et al., 2016: Afforestation to mitigate climate change: impacts on food prices under consideration of albedo effects. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(8)''' , 085001, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085001 10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085001] . ----- Boysen, L.R., W. Lucht, and D. Gerten, 2017a: Trade-offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential. ''Global Change Biology'' , '''23(10)''' , 4303–4317, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13745 10.1111/gcb.13745] . ----- Frank, S. et al., 2017: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(10)''' , 105004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83] . ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] . ----- Stevanović, M. et al., 2017: Mitigation Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture and Land-Use Change: Consequences for Food Prices. ''Environmental Science & Technology'' , '''51(1)''' , 365–374, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04291 10.1021/acs.est.6b04291] . ----- Strapasson, A. et al., 2017: On the global limits of bioenergy and land use for climate change mitigation. ''GCB Bioenergy'' , '''9(12)''' , 1721–1735, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12456 10.1111/gcbb.12456] . ----- Humpenöder, F. et al., 2018: Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(2)''' , 024011, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r309">Bonsch, M. et al., 2014: Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production. ''GCB Bioenergy'' , '''8(1)''' , 11–24, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12226 10.1111/gcbb.12226] .</span> ----- Séférian, R., M. Rocher, C. Guivarch, and J. Colin, 2018: Constraints on biomass energy deployment in mitigation pathways: the case of water limitation. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , 1–32, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabcd7 10.1088/1748-9326/aabcd7] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r310">Bodirsky, B.L. et al., 2014: Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. ''Nature Communications'' , '''5''' , 3858, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4858 10.1038/ncomms4858] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r311">Pawar, R.J. et al., 2015: Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO <sub>2</sub> storage. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''40''' , 292–311, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r312">Nicol, A. et al., 2013: Induced seismicity; observations, risks and mitigation measures at CO <sub>2</sub> storage sites. ''Energy Procedia'' , '''37''' , 4749–4756, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.384 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.384] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r313">Socolow, R. et al., 2011: ''Direct Air Capture of CO <sub>2</sub> with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs'' . American Physical Society (APS), College Park, MD, USA, 100 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r314">Smith, P. et al., 2015: Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(1)''' , 42–50, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870 10.1038/nclimate2870] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r315">Haberl, H. et al., 2011: Global bioenergy potentials from agricultural land in 2050: Sensitivity to climate change, diets and yields. ''Biomass and Bioenergy'' , '''35(12)''' , 4753–4769, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.035 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.035] .</span> ----- Erb, K.-H., H. Haberl, and C. Plutzar, 2012: Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability. ''Energy Policy'' , '''47''' , 260–269, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.066 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.066] . ----- Humpenöder, F. et al., 2018: Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(2)''' , 024011, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r316">Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r317">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r318">Stehfest, E. et al., 2009: Climate benefits of changing diet. ''Climatic Change'' , '''95(1–2)''' , 83–102, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6 10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6] .</span> ----- Popp, A., H. Lotze-Campen, and B. Bodirsky, 2010: Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO <sub>2</sub> greenhouse gases from agricultural production. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''20(3)''' , 451–462, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001] . ----- van Sluisveld, M.A.E., S.H. Martínez, V. Daioglou, and D.P. van Vuuren, 2016: Exploring the implications of lifestyle change in 2°C mitigation scenarios using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''102''' , 309–319, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.013 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.013] . ----- Weindl, I. et al., 2017: Livestock and human use of land: Productivity trends and dietary choices as drivers of future land and carbon dynamics. ''Global and Planetary Change'' , '''159''' , 1–10, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r319">Havlik, P. et al., 2013: Crop Productivity and the Global Livestock Sector: Implications for Land Use Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. ''American Journal of Agricultural Economics'' , '''95(2)''' , 442–448, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas085 10.1093/ajae/aas085] .</span> ----- Valin, H. et al., 2013: Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 035019, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035019 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035019] . ----- Havlík, P. et al., 2014: Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(10)''' , 3709–3714, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308044111 10.1073/pnas.1308044111] . ----- Weindl, I. et al., 2015: Livestock in a changing climate: production system transitions as an adaptation strategy for agriculture. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(9)''' , 094021, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094021 10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094021] . ----- Erb, K.-H. et al., 2016b: Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. ''Nature Communications'' , '''7''' , 11382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11382 10.1038/ncomms11382] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r320">Schmitz, C. et al., 2012: Trading more food: Implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''22(1)''' , 189–209, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.013 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.013] .</span> ----- Calvin, K. et al., 2014: Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 691–704, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y 10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y] . ----- Popp, A. et al., 2014a: Land-use protection for climate change mitigation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''4(12)''' , 1095–1098, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2444 10.1038/nclimate2444] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r321">Unruh, J.D., 2011: Tree-Based Carbon Storage in Developing Countries: Neglect of the Social Sciences. ''Society & Natural Resources'' , '''24(2)''' , 185–192, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920903410136 10.1080/08941920903410136] .</span> ----- Buck, H.J., 2016: Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–13, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6 10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6] . ----- Honegger, M. and D. Reiner, 2018: The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design. ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 306–321, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1413322 10.1080/14693062.2017.1413322] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r322">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r323">Fujimori, S., 2017: SSP3: AIM Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 268–283, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r324">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r325">Humpenöder, F. et al., 2014: Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''9(6)''' , 064029, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064029 10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064029] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r326">Zomer, R.J. et al., 2016: Global Tree Cover and Biomass Carbon on Agricultural Land: The contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. ''Scientific Reports'' , '''6''' , 29987, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29987 10.1038/srep29987] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r327">Werner, C., H.-P. Schmidt, D. Gerten, W. Lucht, and C. Kammann, 2018: Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5°C. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044036, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r328">Weindl, I. et al., 2017: Livestock and human use of land: Productivity trends and dietary choices as drivers of future land and carbon dynamics. ''Global and Planetary Change'' , '''159''' , 1–10, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r329">Unruh, J.D., 2011: Tree-Based Carbon Storage in Developing Countries: Neglect of the Social Sciences. ''Society & Natural Resources'' , '''24(2)''' , 185–192, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920903410136 10.1080/08941920903410136] .</span> ----- Erb, K.-H., H. Haberl, and C. Plutzar, 2012: Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability. ''Energy Policy'' , '''47''' , 260–269, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.066 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.066] . ----- Haberl, H. et al., 2013: Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 031004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004] . ----- Haberl, H., 2015: Competition for land: A sociometabolic perspective. ''Ecological Economics'' , '''119''' , 424–431, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.002 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.002] . ----- Buck, H.J., 2016: Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–13, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6 10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6] . ----- Erb, K.-H. et al., 2016b: Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. ''Nature Communications'' , '''7''' , 11382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11382 10.1038/ncomms11382] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r330">Matthews, H.D. and K. Caldeira, 2008: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions. ''Geophysical Research Letters'' , '''35(4)''' , 1–5, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gl032388 10.1029/2007gl032388] .</span> ----- NRC, 2015: ''Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration'' . National Research Council (NRC). The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, 140 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.17226/18805 10.17226/18805] . ----- Fuss, S. et al., 2016: Research priorities for negative emissions. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(11)''' , 115007, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/115007 10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/115007] . ----- Jones, C.D. et al., 2016: Simulating the Earth system response to negative emissions. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(9)''' , 095012, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095012 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095012] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r331">Gren, I.-M. and A.Z. Aklilu, 2016: Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: A review of the literature. ''Forest Policy and Economics'' , '''70''' , 128–136, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.008 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.008] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r332">Herzog, H., K. Caldeira, and J. Reilly, 2003: An Issue of Permanence: Assessing the Effectiveness of Temporary Carbon Storage. ''Climatic Change'' , '''59(3)''' , 293–310, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1024801618900 10.1023/a:1024801618900] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r333">Rau, G.H., 2011: CO <sub>2</sub> Mitigation via Capture and Chemical Conversion in Seawater. ''Environmental Science & Technology'' , '''45(3)''' , 1088–1092, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es102671x 10.1021/es102671x] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r334">IPCC, 2005: IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. [Metz, B., O. Davidson, H.C. de Coninck, M. Loos, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 442 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r335">Pawar, R.J. et al., 2015: Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO <sub>2</sub> storage. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''40''' , 292–311, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r336">Choi, Y.-S., D. Young, S. Nešić, and L.G.S. Gray, 2013: Wellbore integrity and corrosion of carbon steel in CO <sub>2</sub> geologic storage environments: A literature review. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''16''' , S70–S77, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.028 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.028] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r337">Alcalde, J. et al., 2018: Estimating geological CO <sub>2</sub> storage security to deliver on climate mitigation. ''Nature Communications'' , '''9(1)''' , 2201, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04423-1 10.1038/s41467-018-04423-1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r338">Jones, D.G. et al., 2015: Developments since 2005 in understanding potential environmental impacts of CO <sub>2</sub> leakage from geological storage. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''40''' , 350–377, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.032 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.032] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r339">Scott, V., R.S. Haszeldine, S.F.B. Tett, and A. Oschlies, 2015: Fossil fuels in a trillion tonne world. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(5)''' , 419–423, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2578 10.1038/nclimate2578] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r340">Fricko, O. et al., 2017: The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 251–267, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004] .</span> ----- Fujimori, S., 2017: SSP3: AIM Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 268–283, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2017: Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 297–315, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015] . ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r341">Riahi, K. et al., 2015: Locked into Copenhagen pledges – Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 8–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016] .</span> ----- Luderer, G., C. Bertram, K. Calvin, E. De Cian, and E. Kriegler, 2016a: Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways. ''Climatic Change'' , '''136(1)''' , 127–140, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9 10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r342">Matthews, H.D., N.P. Gillett, P.A. Stott, and K. Zickfeld, 2009: The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. ''Nature'' , '''459(7248)''' , 829–832, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08047 10.1038/nature08047] .</span> ----- Zickfeld, K., M. Eby, H.D. Matthews, and A.J. Weaver, 2009: Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''106(38)''' , 16129–16134, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805800106 10.1073/pnas.0805800106] . ----- Collins, M. et al., 2013: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: ''Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1029–1136. ----- Knutti, R. and J. Rogelj, 2015: The legacy of our CO <sub>2</sub> emissions: a clash of scientific facts, politics and ethics. ''Climatic Change'' , '''133(3)''' , 361–373, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1340-3 10.1007/s10584-015-1340-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r343">Unruh, G.C. and J. Carrillo-Hermosilla, 2006: Globalizing carbon lock-in. ''Energy Policy'' , '''34(10)''' , 1185–1197, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.10.013 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.10.013] .</span> ----- Jakob, M. et al., 2014: Feasible mitigation actions in developing countries. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''4(11)''' , 961–968, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2370 10.1038/nclimate2370] . ----- Erickson, P., S. Kartha, M. Lazarus, and K. Tempest, 2015: Assessing carbon lock-in. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(8)''' , 084023, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084023 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084023] . ----- Steckel, J.C., O. Edenhofer, and M. Jakob, 2015: Drivers for the renaissance of coal. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''112(29)''' , E3775–E3781, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422722112 10.1073/pnas.1422722112] . ----- Seto, K.C. et al., 2016: Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications. ''Annual Review of Environment and Resources'' , '''41(1)''' , 425–452, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934] . ----- Michaelowa, A., M. Allen, and F. Sha, 2018: Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 275–286, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r344">Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] .</span> ----- Johnson, N. et al., 2015: Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90''' , 89–102, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.028 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.028] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r345">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r346">den Elzen, M.G.J., D.P. van Vuuren, and J. van Vliet, 2010: Postponing emission reductions from 2020 to 2030 increases climate risks and long-term costs. ''Climatic Change'' , '''99(1)''' , 313–320, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9798-5 10.1007/s10584-010-9798-5] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. and K. Riahi, 2011: The relationship between short-term emissions and long-term concentration targets. ''Climatic Change'' , '''104(3)''' , 793–801, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-0004-6 10.1007/s10584-010-0004-6] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2013b: What Does the 2°C Target Imply for a Global Climate Agreement in 2020? The Limits Study on Durban Platform Scenarios. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''4(4)''' , 1340008, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007813400083 10.1142/s2010007813400083] . ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] . ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, A. Reisinger, M. Meinshausen, and K. Riahi, 2013b: Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. ''Nature'' , '''493(7430)''' , 79–83, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11787 10.1038/nature11787] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2015: Locked into Copenhagen pledges – Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 8–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016] . ----- Luderer, G., C. Bertram, K. Calvin, E. De Cian, and E. Kriegler, 2016a: Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways. ''Climatic Change'' , '''136(1)''' , 127–140, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9 10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9] . ----- OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r347">Seto, K.C. et al., 2016: Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications. ''Annual Review of Environment and Resources'' , '''41(1)''' , 425–452, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934] .</span> ----- Edenhofer, O., J.C. Steckel, M. Jakob, and C. Bertram, 2018: Reports of coal’s terminal decline may be exaggerated. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(2)''' , 024019, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa3a2 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa3a2] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r348">den Elzen, M.G.J. et al., 2016: Contribution of the G20 economies to the global impact of the Paris agreement climate proposals. ''Climatic Change'' , '''137(3–4)''' , 655–665, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1700-7 10.1007/s10584-016-1700-7] .</span> ----- Fujimori, S. et al., 2016: Implication of Paris Agreement in the context of long-term climate mitigation goals. ''SpringerPlus'' , '''5(1)''' , 1620, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3235-9 10.1186/s40064-016-3235-9] . ----- UNFCCC, 2016: ''Aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: an update'' . FCCC/CP/2016/2, The Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Bonn, Germany, 75 pp. ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2017: Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties. ''Nature Communications'' , '''8''' , 15748, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15748 10.1038/ncomms15748] . ----- Rose, S.K., R. Richels, G. Blanford, and T. Rutherford, 2017b: The Paris Agreement and next steps in limiting global warming. ''Climatic Change'' , '''142(1–2)''' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1935-y 10.1007/s10584-017-1935-y] . ----- Benveniste, H. et al., 2018: Impacts of nationally determined contributions on 2030 global greenhouse gas emissions: Uncertainty analysis and distribution of emissions. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(1)''' , 014022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa0b9 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa0b9] . ----- Vrontisi, Z. et al., 2018: Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5°C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044039, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab53e 10.1088/1748-9326/aab53e] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r349">Rogelj, J. et al., 2016a: Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. ''Nature'' , '''534(7609)''' , 631–639, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18307 10.1038/nature18307] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r350">Fawcett, A.A. et al., 2015: Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? ''Science'' , '''350(6265)''' , 1168–1169, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5761 10.1126/science.aad5761] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016a: Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. ''Nature'' , '''534(7609)''' , 631–639, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18307 10.1038/nature18307] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r351">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018b: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r352">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018b: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160457, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r353">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r354">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r355">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r356">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r357">Holz, C., L.S. Siegel, E. Johnston, A.P. Jones, and J. Sterman, 2018b: Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(6)''' , 064028, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1] .</span> ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r358">Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r359">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r360">Bertram, C. et al., 2015b: Complementing carbon prices with technology policies to keep climate targets within reach. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(3)''' , 235–239, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2514 10.1038/nclimate2514] .</span> ----- IEA, 2015a: ''Energy and Climate Change. World Energy Outlook Special Report'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 200 pp. ----- Spencer, T., R. Pierfederici, H. Waisman, and M. Colombier, 2015: ''Beyond the Numbers. Understanding the Transformation Induced by INDCs'' . Study N°05/15, MILES Project Consortium, Paris, France, 80 pp. ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r361">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r362">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r363">Bruckner, T., I.A. Bashmakov, and Y. Mulugetta, 2014: Energy Systems. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 511–598.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r364">Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r365">Kim, S.H., K. Wada, A. Kurosawa, and M. Roberts, 2014: Nuclear energy response in the EMF27 study. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 443–460, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1098-z 10.1007/s10584-014-1098-z] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r366">O’Neill, B.C. et al., 2017: The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 169–180, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2017b: Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 237–250, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r367">Creutzig, F. et al., 2017: The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. ''Nature Energy'' , '''2(9)''' , 17140, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 10.1038/nenergy.2017.140] .</span> ----- Jacobson, M.Z. et al., 2017: 100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World. ''Joule'' , '''1(1)''' , 108–121, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005 10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r368">Clack, C.T.M. et al., 2017: Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(26)''' , 6722–6727, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610381114 10.1073/pnas.1610381114] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r369">Hong, S., C.J.A. Bradshaw, and B.W. Brook, 2015: Global zero-carbon energy pathways using viable mixes of nuclear and renewables. ''Applied Energy'' , '''143''' , 451–459, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.006 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.006] .</span> ----- Berger, A. et al., 2017a: Nuclear energy and bio energy carbon capture and storage, keys for obtaining 1.5°C mean surface temperature limit. ''International Journal of Global Energy Issues'' , '''40(3/4)''' , 240–254, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijgei.2017.086622 10.1504/ijgei.2017.086622] . ----- Berger, A. et al., 2017b: How much can nuclear energy do about global warming? ''International Journal of Global Energy Issues'' , '''40(1/2)''' , 43–78, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijgei.2017.080766 10.1504/ijgei.2017.080766] . ----- Xiao, X.-J. and K. Jiang, 2018: China’s nuclear power under the global 1.5°C target: Preliminary feasibility study and prospects. ''Advances in Climate Change Research'' , '''9(2)''' , 138–143, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2018.05.002 10.1016/j.accre.2018.05.002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r370">Burns, W. and S. Nicholson, 2017: Bioenergy and carbon capture with storage (BECCS): the prospects and challenges of an emerging climate policy response. ''Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences'' , '''7(4)''' , 527–534, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0445-6 10.1007/s13412-017-0445-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r371">OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r372">IEA, 2017e: ''World Energy Statistics 2017'' . International Energy Agency (IEA). OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 847 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/world_energy_stats-2017-en 10.1787/world_energy_stats-2017-en] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r373">Bruckner, T., I.A. Bashmakov, and Y. Mulugetta, 2014: Energy Systems. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 511–598.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r374">IEA, 2017b: ''Renewables Information – Overview (2017 edition)'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, 11 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r375">OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r376">IEA, 2017e: ''World Energy Statistics 2017'' . International Energy Agency (IEA). OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 847 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/world_energy_stats-2017-en 10.1787/world_energy_stats-2017-en] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r377">Krey, V., G. Luderer, L. Clarke, and E. Kriegler, 2014a: Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123''' , 369–382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5 10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5] .</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2014b: The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: Overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 353–367, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7 10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r378">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r379">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r380">Pehl, M. et al., 2017: Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling. ''Nature Energy'' , '''2(12)''' , 939–945, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9 10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r381">IEAGHG, 2006: ''Near zero emission technology for CO <sub>2</sub> capture from power plant'' . IEAGHG 2006/13, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, UK, 114 pp.</span> ----- NETL, 2013: ''Cost and performance of PC and IGCC plants for a range of carbon dioxide capture: Revision 1'' . DOE/NETL-2011/1498, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), 500 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r382">IPCC, 2005: IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. [Metz, B., O. Davidson, H.C. de Coninck, M. Loos, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 442 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r383">IPCC, 2005: IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. [Metz, B., O. Davidson, H.C. de Coninck, M. Loos, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 442 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r384">IPCC, 2005: IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. [Metz, B., O. Davidson, H.C. de Coninck, M. Loos, and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 442 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r385">Vangkilde-Pedersen, T. et al., 2009: Assessing European capacity for geological storage of carbon dioxide-the EU GeoCapacity project. ''Energy Procedia'' , '''1(1)''' , 2663–2670, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.034 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.034] .</span> ----- Ogawa, T., S. Nakanishi, T. Shidahara, T. Okumura, and E. Hayashi, 2011: Saline-aquifer CO <sub>2</sub> sequestration in Japan-methodology of storage capacity assessment. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''5(2)''' , 318–326, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.09.009 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.09.009] . ----- Wei, N. et al., 2013: A preliminary sub-basin scale evaluation framework of site suitability for onshore aquifer-based CO <sub>2</sub> storage in China. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''12''' , 231–246, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.012 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.012] . ----- Bentham, M., T. Mallows, J. Lowndes, and A. Green, 2014: CO <sub>2</sub> STORage evaluation database (CO <sub>2</sub> Stored). The UK’s online storage atlas. ''Energy Procedia'' , '''63''' , 5103–5113, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.540 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.540] . ----- Riis, F. and E. Halland, 2014: CO <sub>2</sub> storage atlas of the Norwegian Continental shelf: Methods used to evaluate capacity and maturity of the CO <sub>2</sub> storage potential. ''Energy Procedia'' , '''63''' , 5258–5265, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.557 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.557] . ----- Warwick, P.D., M.K. Verma, P.A. Freeman, M.D. Corum, and S.H. Hickman, 2014: U.S. geological survey carbon sequestration – geologic research and assessments. ''Energy Procedia'' , '''63''' , 5305–5309, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.561 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.561] . ----- NETL, 2015: ''Carbon Storage Atlas – Fifth Edition (Atlas V)'' . U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), 114 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r386">Bachu, S. et al., 2007a: ''Phase II Final Report from the Task Force for Review and Identification of Standards for CO <sub>2</sub> Storage Capacity Estimation'' . CSLF-T-2007-04, Task Force on CO <sub>2</sub> Storage Capacity Estimation for the Technical Group (TG) of the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF), 43 pp.</span> ----- Bachu, S. et al., 2007b: CO <sub>2</sub> storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''1(4)''' , 430–443, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00086-2 10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00086-2] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r387">Dooley, J.J., 2013: Estimating the supply and demand for deep geologic CO <sub>2</sub> storage capacity over the course of the 21st century: A meta-analysis of the literature. ''Energy Procedia'' , '''37''' , 5141–5150, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.429 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.429] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r388">Bachu, S. et al., 2007a: ''Phase II Final Report from the Task Force for Review and Identification of Standards for CO <sub>2</sub> Storage Capacity Estimation'' . CSLF-T-2007-04, Task Force on CO <sub>2</sub> Storage Capacity Estimation for the Technical Group (TG) of the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF), 43 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r389">Szulczewski, M.L., C.W. MacMinn, and R. Juanes, 2014: Theoretical analysis of how pressure buildup and CO <sub>2</sub> migration can both constrain storage capacity in deep saline aquifers. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''23''' , 113–118, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.02.006 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.02.006] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r390">Bachu, S., 2015: Review of CO <sub>2</sub> storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''40''' , 188–202, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r391">Kearns, J. et al., 2017: Developing a consistent database for regional geologic CO <sub>2</sub> storage capacity worldwide. ''Energy Procedia'' , '''114''' , 4697–4709, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1603 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1603] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r392">Bachu, S., 2015: Review of CO <sub>2</sub> storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers. ''International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control'' , '''40''' , 188–202, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r393">Bruckner, T., I.A. Bashmakov, and Y. Mulugetta, 2014: Energy Systems. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 511–598.</span> ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510. ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r394">OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r395">IEA, 2014: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2014: Harnessing Electricity’s Potential'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 382 pp.</span> ----- IEA, 2015b: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2015: Mobilising Innovation to Accelerate Climate Action'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 418 pp. ----- IEA, 2016a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2016: Towards Sustainable Urban Energy Systems'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 418 pp. ----- IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r396">OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r397">Shell International B.V., 2018: ''Shell Scenarios: Sky – Meeting the Goals of the Paris Agreement'' . Shell International B.V. 36 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r398">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r399">OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r400">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r401">Saunders, H.D., 2015: Recent Evidence for Large Rebound: Elucidating the Drivers and their Implications for Climate Change Models. ''The Energy Journal'' , '''36(1)''' , 23–48, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.1.2 10.5547/01956574.36.1.2] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r402">Bauer, N. et al., 2017: Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 316–330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r403">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span> ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r404">Rogelj, J. et al., 2015b: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(6)''' , 519–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572 10.1038/nclimate2572] .</span> ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2016b: ''Deep Decarbonisation towards 1.5°C – 2°C stabilization: Policy findings from the ADVANCE project'' . The ADVANCE Consortium, 42 pp. ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r405">Hoesly, R.M. et al., 2018: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). ''Geoscientific Model Development'' , '''11(1)''' , 369–408, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018 10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r406">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r407">Banerjee, R. et al., 2012: Energy End-Use: Industry. In: ''Global Energy Assessment – Toward a Sustainable Future'' [Johansson, T.B., N. Nakicenovic, A. Patwardhan, and L. Gomez-Echeverri (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 513–574, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511793677.014 10.1017/cbo9780511793677.014] .</span> ----- IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r408">Allwood, J.M., M.F. Ashby, T.G. Gutowski, and E. Worrell, 2013: Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''371(1986)''' , 20120496, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0496 10.1098/rsta.2012.0496] .</span> ----- IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r409">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r410">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r411">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r412">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r413">Global CCS Institute, 2016: ''The Global Status of CCS: 2016 Summary Report'' . Global CCS Institute, Melbourne, Australia, 28 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r414">Irlam, L., 2017: ''Global Costs of Carbon Capture and Storage'' . Global CCS Institute, Melbourne, Australia, 14 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r415">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r416">Lucon, O. et al., 2014: Buildings. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 671–738.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r417">Lucon, O. et al., 2014: Buildings. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 671–738.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r418">Shah, N., M. Wei, V. Letschert, and A. Phadke, 2015: ''Benefits of Leapfrogging to Superefficiency and Low Global Warming Potential Refrigerants in Room Air Conditioning'' . LBNL-1003671, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA, 58 pp.</span> ----- Purohit, P. and L. Höglund-Isaksson, 2017: Global emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases 2005–2050 with abatement potentials and costs. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''17(4)''' , 2795–2816, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2795-2017 10.5194/acp-17-2795-2017] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r419">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r420">Güneralp, B. et al., 2017: Global scenarios of urban density and its impacts on building energy use through 2050. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(34)''' , 8945–8950, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606035114 10.1073/pnas.1606035114] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r421">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r422">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r423">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Sims, R. et al., 2014: Transport. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadne, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 599–670.</li> <li><span id="fn:r424">Yeh, S. et al., 2016: Detailed assessment of global transport-energy models’ structures and projections. ''Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment'' , '''55''' , 294–309, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.001 10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.001] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r425">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r426">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r427">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r428">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r429">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Smith, P. and M. Bustamante, 2014: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 811–922. ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r430">Smith, P. and M. Bustamante, 2014: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 811–922.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r431">Smith, P. and M. Bustamante, 2014: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 811–922.</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r432">Calvin, K. et al., 2017: The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 284–296, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010] .</span> ----- Fricko, O. et al., 2017: The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 251–267, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004] . ----- Fujimori, S., 2017: SSP3: AIM Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 268–283, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2017: Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 297–315, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015] . ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2017b: Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 237–250, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008] . ----- Doelman, J.C. et al., 2018: Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''48''' , 119–135, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r433">O’Neill, B.C. et al., 2014: A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. ''Climatic Change'' , '''122(3)''' , 387–400, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r434">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r435">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r436">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r437">Frank, S. et al., 2017: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(10)''' , 105004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83] .</span> ----- Fujimori, S., 2017: SSP3: AIM Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 268–283, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r438">Kriegler, E. et al., 2017: Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 297–315, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r439">FAOSTAT, 2018: Database Collection of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/faostat .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r440">Searle, S.Y. and C.J. Malins, 2014: Will energy crop yields meet expectations? ''Biomass and Bioenergy'' , '''65''' , 3–12, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.001 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.001] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r441">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r442">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r443">Prestele, R. et al., 2016: Hotspots of uncertainty in land-use and land-cover change projections: a global-scale model comparison. ''Global Change Biology'' , '''22(12)''' , 3967–3983, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337 10.1111/gcb.13337] .</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] . ----- Doelman, J.C. et al., 2018: Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''48''' , 119–135, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r444">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r445">FAOSTAT, 2018: Database Collection of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/faostat .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r446">FAOSTAT, 2018: Database Collection of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/faostat .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r447">Smith, P. et al., 2013: How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? ''Global Change Biology'' , '''19(8)''' , 2285–2302, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12160 10.1111/gcb.12160] .</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r448">Smith, P. et al., 2013: How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? ''Global Change Biology'' , '''19(8)''' , 2285–2302, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12160 10.1111/gcb.12160] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r449">Lambin, E.F. and P. Meyfroidt, 2011: Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''108(9)''' , 3465–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108 10.1073/pnas.1100480108] .</span> ----- Smith, P. and M. Bustamante, 2014: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 811–922.</li> <li><span id="fn:r450">Havlík, P. et al., 2014: Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(10)''' , 3709–3714, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308044111 10.1073/pnas.1308044111] .</span> ----- Weindl, I. et al., 2015: Livestock in a changing climate: production system transitions as an adaptation strategy for agriculture. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(9)''' , 094021, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094021 10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094021] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r451">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r452">Schmitz, C. et al., 2012: Trading more food: Implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''22(1)''' , 189–209, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.013 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.013] .</span> ----- Wiebe, K. et al., 2015: Climate change impacts on agriculture in 2050 under a range of plausible socioeconomic and emissions scenarios. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(8)''' , 085010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085010 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085010] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r453">Stevanović, M. et al., 2017: Mitigation Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture and Land-Use Change: Consequences for Food Prices. ''Environmental Science & Technology'' , '''51(1)''' , 365–374, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04291 10.1021/acs.est.6b04291] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r454">Weindl, I. et al., 2017: Livestock and human use of land: Productivity trends and dietary choices as drivers of future land and carbon dynamics. ''Global and Planetary Change'' , '''159''' , 1–10, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r455">Weindl, I. et al., 2017: Livestock and human use of land: Productivity trends and dietary choices as drivers of future land and carbon dynamics. ''Global and Planetary Change'' , '''159''' , 1–10, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r456">Gerber, P.J. et al., 2013: ''Tackling climate change through livestock – A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities'' . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy, 115 pp.</span> ----- Havlík, P. et al., 2014: Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(10)''' , 3709–3714, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308044111 10.1073/pnas.1308044111] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r457">Valin, H. et al., 2013: Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 035019, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035019 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035019] .</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2014a: Land-use protection for climate change mitigation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''4(12)''' , 1095–1098, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2444 10.1038/nclimate2444] . ----- Wise, M., K. Calvin, P. Kyle, P. Luckow, and J. Edmonds, 2014: Economic and physical modeling of land use in GCAM 3.0 and an application to agricultural productivity, land, and terrestrial carbon. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''5(2)''' , 1450003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007814500031 10.1142/s2010007814500031] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r458">Calvin, K. et al., 2017: The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 284–296, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010] .</span> ----- Fricko, O. et al., 2017: The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 251–267, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004] . ----- Fujimori, S., 2017: SSP3: AIM Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 268–283, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r459">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r460">Popp, A. et al., 2014b: Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: Model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 495–509, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0926-x 10.1007/s10584-013-0926-x] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r461">Calvin, K. et al., 2017: The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 284–296, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r462">Calvin, K. et al., 2014: Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 691–704, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y 10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y] .</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2014a: Land-use protection for climate change mitigation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''4(12)''' , 1095–1098, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2444 10.1038/nclimate2444] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2017: Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 297–315, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r463">Wang, X. et al., 2016: Taking account of governance: Implications for land-use dynamics, food prices, and trade patterns. ''Ecological Economics'' , '''122''' , 12–24, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.018 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r464">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r465">Griscom, B.W. et al., 2017: Natural climate solutions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(44)''' , 11645–11650, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114 10.1073/pnas.1710465114] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r466">Smith, P., 2016: Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. ''Global Change Biology'' , '''22(3)''' , 1315–1324, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13178 10.1111/gcb.13178] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r467">Strefler, J., T. Amann, N. Bauer, E. Kriegler, and J. Hartmann, 2018a: Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(3)''' , 034010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r468">Gernaat, D.E.H.J. et al., 2015: Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''33''' , 142–153, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010] .</span> ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] . ----- Stevanović, M. et al., 2017: Mitigation Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture and Land-Use Change: Consequences for Food Prices. ''Environmental Science & Technology'' , '''51(1)''' , 365–374, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04291 10.1021/acs.est.6b04291] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r469">Gernaat, D.E.H.J. et al., 2015: Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''33''' , 142–153, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r470">Frank, S. et al., 2018: Structural change as a key component for agricultural non-CO <sub>2</sub> mitigation efforts. ''Nature Communications'' , '''9(1)''' , 1060, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03489-1 10.1038/s41467-018-03489-1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r471">Kriegler, E. et al., 2017: Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 297–315, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r472">Davis, S.C. et al., 2013: Management swing potential for bioenergy crops. ''GCB Bioenergy'' , '''5(6)''' , 623–638, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12042 10.1111/gcbb.12042] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r473">Tilman, D. and M. Clark, 2014: Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. ''Nature'' , '''515(7528)''' , 518–522, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13959 10.1038/nature13959] .</span> ----- Erb, K.-H. et al., 2016b: Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. ''Nature Communications'' , '''7''' , 11382, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11382 10.1038/ncomms11382] . ----- Springmann, M., H.C.J. Godfray, M. Rayner, and P. Scarborough, 2016: Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''113(15)''' , 4146–4151, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523119113 10.1073/pnas.1523119113] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r474">Bajželj, B. et al., 2014: Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''4(10)''' , 924–929, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2353 10.1038/nclimate2353] .</span> ----- Muller, A. et al., 2017: Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. ''Nature Communications'' , '''8(1)''' , 1290, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01410-w 10.1038/s41467-017-01410-w] . ----- Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r475">Tilman, D. and M. Clark, 2014: Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. ''Nature'' , '''515(7528)''' , 518–522, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13959 10.1038/nature13959] .</span> ----- Springmann, M., H.C.J. Godfray, M. Rayner, and P. Scarborough, 2016: Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''113(15)''' , 4146–4151, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523119113 10.1073/pnas.1523119113] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r476">Humpenöder, F. et al., 2014: Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''9(6)''' , 064029, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064029 10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064029] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r477">Frank, S. et al., 2017: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''12(10)''' , 105004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c83] .</span> ----- Doelman, J.C. et al., 2018: Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''48''' , 119–135, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014] . ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r478">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r479">Erb, K.-H. et al., 2016a: Biomass turnover time in terrestrial ecosystems halved by land use. ''Nature Geoscience'' , '''9(9)''' , 674–678, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2782 10.1038/ngeo2782] .</span> ----- Naudts, K. et al., 2016: Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming. ''Science'' , '''351(6273)''' , 597–600, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7270 10.1126/science.aad7270] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r480">Haberl, H. et al., 2013: Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 031004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004] .</span> ----- Searle, S.Y. and C.J. Malins, 2014: Will energy crop yields meet expectations? ''Biomass and Bioenergy'' , '''65''' , 3–12, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.001 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.001] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r481">Liu, J., T.W. Hertel, F. Taheripour, T. Zhu, and C. Ringler, 2014: International trade buffers the impact of future irrigation shortfalls. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''29''' , 22–31, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.010] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r482">Nelson, G.C. et al., 2014: Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(9)''' , 3274–9, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222465110 10.1073/pnas.1222465110] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r483">Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r484">Shindell, D.T. et al., 2012: Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security. ''Science'' , '''335(6065)''' , 183–189, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026 10.1126/science.1210026] .</span> ----- Mahowald, N.M. et al., 2017: Aerosol Deposition Impacts on Land and Ocean Carbon Cycles. ''Current Climate Change Reports'' , '''3(1)''' , 16–31, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0056-z 10.1007/s40641-017-0056-z] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r485">Geels, F.W., B.K. Sovacool, T. Schwanen, and S. Sorrell, 2017: Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. ''Science'' , '''357(6357)''' , 1242–1244, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760 10.1126/science.aao3760] .</span> ----- Kuramochi, T. et al., 2017: Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C. ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 1–19, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495 10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495] . ----- Rockström, J. et al., 2017: A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. ''Science'' , '''355(6331)''' , 1269–1271, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443 10.1126/science.aah3443] . ----- Vogt-Schilb, A. and S. Hallegatte, 2017: Climate policies and nationally determined contributions: reconciling the needed ambition with the political economy. ''Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment'' , '''6(6)''' , 1–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wene.256 10.1002/wene.256] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Michaelowa, A., M. Allen, and F. Sha, 2018: Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 275–286, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r486">Rogelj, J. et al., 2015b: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(6)''' , 519–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572 10.1038/nclimate2572] .</span> ----- Bataille, C. et al., 2016b: The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy. ''Climate Policy'' , '''16(sup1)''' , S7–S26, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005 10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r487">Geels, F.W., B.K. Sovacool, T. Schwanen, and S. Sorrell, 2017: Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. ''Science'' , '''357(6357)''' , 1242–1244, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760 10.1126/science.aao3760] .</span> ----- IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp. ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r488">Riahi, K. et al., 2015: Locked into Copenhagen pledges – Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 8–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016] .</span> ----- Kuramochi, T. et al., 2017: Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C. ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 1–19, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495 10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r489">Mundaca, L. and A. Markandya, 2016: Assessing regional progress towards a Green Energy Economy. ''Applied Energy'' , '''179''' , 1372–1394, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.098 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.098] .</span> ----- Kuramochi, T. et al., 2017: Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C. ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 1–19, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495 10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495] . ----- OECD, 2017: ''Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth'' . OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 314 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273528-en 10.1787/9789264273528-en] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] . ----- Michaelowa, A., M. Allen, and F. Sha, 2018: Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 275–286, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r490">Bataille, C., H. Waisman, M. Colombier, L. Segafredo, and J. Williams, 2016a: The Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP): insights and emerging issues. ''Climate Policy'' , '''16(sup1)''' , S1–S6, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1179620 10.1080/14693062.2016.1179620] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r491">Grubb, M., J.C. Hourcade, and K. Neuhoff, 2014: ''Planetary economics: Energy, climate change and the three domains of sustainable development'' . Routledge Earthscan, Abingdon, UK and New York, NY, USA, 520 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r492">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r493">Creutzig, F., 2016: Evolving Narratives of Low-Carbon Futures in Transportation. ''Transport Reviews'' , '''36(3)''' , 341–360, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1079277 10.1080/01441647.2015.1079277] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r494">IEA, 2017a: ''Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalyzing Energy Technology Transformations'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 443 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r495">Bruckner, T., I.A. Bashmakov, and Y. Mulugetta, 2014: Energy Systems. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 511–598.</span> ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2014: The role of renewable energy in climate stabilization: results from the {EMF}27 scenarios. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 427–441, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0924-z 10.1007/s10584-013-0924-z] . ----- Creutzig, F. et al., 2017: The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. ''Nature Energy'' , '''2(9)''' , 17140, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 10.1038/nenergy.2017.140] . ----- Pietzcker, R.C. et al., 2017: System integration of wind and solar power in integrated assessment models: A cross-model evaluation of new approaches. ''Energy Economics'' , '''64''' , 583–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r496">OECD, 2017: ''Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth'' . OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 314 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273528-en 10.1787/9789264273528-en] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r497">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r498">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2014b: The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: Overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. ''Climatic Change'' , '''123(3–4)''' , 353–367, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7 10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2015: Locked into Copenhagen pledges – Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 8–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016] . ----- Kuramochi, T. et al., 2017: Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C. ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 1–19, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495 10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495] . ----- Brown, M.A. and Y. Li, 2018: Carbon pricing and energy efficiency: pathways to deep decarbonization of the US electric sector. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–19, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9686-9 10.1007/s12053-018-9686-9] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- Wachsmuth, J. and V. Duscha, 2018: Achievability of the Paris targets in the EU-the role of demand-side-driven mitigation in different types of scenarios. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–19, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9670-4 10.1007/s12053-018-9670-4] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r499">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, A. Reisinger, M. Meinshausen, and K. Riahi, 2013b: Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. ''Nature'' , '''493(7430)''' , 79–83, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11787 10.1038/nature11787] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2015b: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(6)''' , 519–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572 10.1038/nclimate2572] . ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r500">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, A. Reisinger, M. Meinshausen, and K. Riahi, 2013b: Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. ''Nature'' , '''493(7430)''' , 79–83, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11787 10.1038/nature11787] . ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510. ----- Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2015b: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(6)''' , 519–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572 10.1038/nclimate2572] . ----- Bataille, C. et al., 2016b: The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy. ''Climate Policy'' , '''16(sup1)''' , S7–S26, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005 10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r501">Méjean, A., C. Guivarch, J. Lefèvre, and M. Hamdi-Cherif, 2018: The transition in energy demand sectors to limit global warming to 1.5°C. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–22, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9682-0 10.1007/s12053-018-9682-0] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r502">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r503">Gota, S., C. Huizenga, K. Peet, N. Medimorec, and S. Bakker, 2018: Decarbonising transport to achieve Paris Agreement targets. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–24, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9671-3 10.1007/s12053-018-9671-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r504">Wachsmuth, J. and V. Duscha, 2018: Achievability of the Paris targets in the EU-the role of demand-side-driven mitigation in different types of scenarios. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–19, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9670-4 10.1007/s12053-018-9670-4] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r505">Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r506">Saunders, H.D., 2015: Recent Evidence for Large Rebound: Elucidating the Drivers and their Implications for Climate Change Models. ''The Energy Journal'' , '''36(1)''' , 23–48, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.1.2 10.5547/01956574.36.1.2] .</span> ----- van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2017: Rebound policy in the Paris Agreement: instrument comparison and climate-club revenue offsets. ''Climate Policy'' , '''17(6)''' , 801–813, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1169499 10.1080/14693062.2016.1169499] . ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r507">Bauer, N. et al., 2017: Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 316–330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006] .</span> ----- Guivarch, C. and J. Rogelj, 2017: ''Carbon price variations in 2°C scenarios explored'' . Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), 15 pp. ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r508">Marangoni, G. et al., 2017: Sensitivity of projected long-term CO <sub>2</sub> emissions across the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(1)''' , 113–119, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3199 10.1038/nclimate3199] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r509">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r510">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r511">Popp, A. et al., 2017: Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 331–345, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r512">Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r513">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2015: Locked into Copenhagen pledges – Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 8–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016] . ----- Marangoni, G. et al., 2017: Sensitivity of projected long-term CO <sub>2</sub> emissions across the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(1)''' , 113–119, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3199 10.1038/nclimate3199] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2017: Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties. ''Nature Communications'' , '''8''' , 15748, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15748 10.1038/ncomms15748] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r514">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Rogelj, J., D.L. McCollum, A. Reisinger, M. Meinshausen, and K. Riahi, 2013b: Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. ''Nature'' , '''493(7430)''' , 79–83, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11787 10.1038/nature11787] . ----- OECD, 2017: ''Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth'' . OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 314 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273528-en 10.1787/9789264273528-en] . ----- Holz, C., S. Kartha, and T. Athanasiou, 2018a: Fairly sharing 1.5: national fair shares of a 1.5°C-compliant global mitigation effort. ''International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics'' , '''18(1)''' , 117–134, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9371-z 10.1007/s10784-017-9371-z] . ----- Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r515">Fawcett, A.A. et al., 2015: Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? ''Science'' , '''350(6265)''' , 1168–1169, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5761 10.1126/science.aad5761] .</span> ----- Aldy, J.E. et al., 2016: Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris Agreement. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''6(11)''' , 1000–1004, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3106 10.1038/nclimate3106] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2016a: Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. ''Nature'' , '''534(7609)''' , 631–639, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18307 10.1038/nature18307] . ----- Hof, A.F. et al., 2017: Global and regional abatement costs of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2°C and 1.5°C. ''Environmental Science & Policy'' , '''71''' , 30–40, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.008 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.008] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2017: Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties. ''Nature Communications'' , '''8''' , 15748, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15748 10.1038/ncomms15748] . ----- van Soest, H.L. et al., 2017: Low-emission pathways in 11 major economies: comparison of cost-optimal pathways and Paris climate proposals. ''Climatic Change'' , '''142(3–4)''' , 491–504, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1964-6 10.1007/s10584-017-1964-6] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r516">Strefler, J. et al., 2018b: Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(4)''' , 044015, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r517">Luderer, G. et al., 2016b: ''Deep Decarbonisation towards 1.5°C – 2°C stabilization: Policy findings from the ADVANCE project'' . The ADVANCE Consortium, 42 pp.</span> ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r518">Roelfsema, M., M. Harmsen, J.J.G. Olivier, A.F. Hof, and D.P. van Vuuren, 2018: Integrated assessment of international climate mitigation commitments outside the UNFCCC. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''48''' , 67–75, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.001 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.001] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r519">Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2016: Carbon budgets and energy transition pathways. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(7)''' , 075002, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/075002 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/075002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r520">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2015: Locked into Copenhagen pledges – Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 8–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016] . ----- Xu, Y. and V. Ramanathan, 2017: Well below 2°C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(39)''' , 10315–10323, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618481114 10.1073/pnas.1618481114] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r521">Arroyo-Currás, T. et al., 2015: Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90''' , 192–203, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.002 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.002] .</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2015b: Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 24–44, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r522">Bataille, C., H. Waisman, M. Colombier, L. Segafredo, and J. Williams, 2016a: The Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP): insights and emerging issues. ''Climate Policy'' , '''16(sup1)''' , S1–S6, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1179620 10.1080/14693062.2016.1179620] .</span> ----- Mundaca, L. and A. Markandya, 2016: Assessing regional progress towards a Green Energy Economy. ''Applied Energy'' , '''179''' , 1372–1394, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.098 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.098] . ----- Baranzini, A. et al., 2017: Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. ''Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , e462, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.462 10.1002/wcc.462] . ----- MacDougall, A.H., N.C. Swart, and R. Knutti, 2017: The Uncertainty in the Transient Climate Response to Cumulative CO 2 Emissions Arising from the Uncertainty in Physical Climate Parameters. ''Journal of Climate'' , '''30(2)''' , 813–827, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0205.1 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0205.1] . ----- van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2017: Rebound policy in the Paris Agreement: instrument comparison and climate-club revenue offsets. ''Climate Policy'' , '''17(6)''' , 801–813, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1169499 10.1080/14693062.2016.1169499] . ----- Vogt-Schilb, A. and S. Hallegatte, 2017: Climate policies and nationally determined contributions: reconciling the needed ambition with the political economy. ''Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment'' , '''6(6)''' , 1–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wene.256 10.1002/wene.256] . ----- Chan, S., P. Ellinger, and O. Widerberg, 2018: Exploring national and regional orchestration of non-state action for a <1.5°C world. ''International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics'' , '''18(1)''' , 135–152, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9384-2 10.1007/s10784-018-9384-2] . ----- Holz, C., S. Kartha, and T. Athanasiou, 2018a: Fairly sharing 1.5: national fair shares of a 1.5°C-compliant global mitigation effort. ''International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics'' , '''18(1)''' , 117–134, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9371-z 10.1007/s10784-017-9371-z] . ----- Klinsky, S. and H. Winkler, 2018: Building equity in: strategies for integrating equity into modelling for a 1.5°C world. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences'' , '''376(2119)''' , 20160461, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0461 10.1098/rsta.2016.0461] . ----- Michaelowa, A., M. Allen, and F. Sha, 2018: Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 275–286, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977] . ----- Patterson, J.J. et al., 2018: Political feasibility of 1.5°C societal transformations: the role of social justice. ''Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability'' , '''31''' , 1–9, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.002 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.002] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r523">Kolstad, C. et al., 2014: Social, Economic and Ethical Concepts and Methods. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadne, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 207–282.</span> ----- Mehling, M. and E. Tvinnereim, 2018: Carbon Pricing and the 1.5°C Target: Near-Term Decarbonisation and the Importance of an Instrument Mix. ''Carbon & Climate Law Review'' , '''12(1)''' , 50–61, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2018/1/9 10.21552/cclr/2018/1/9] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r524">Geels, F.W., B.K. Sovacool, T. Schwanen, and S. Sorrell, 2017: Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. ''Science'' , '''357(6357)''' , 1242–1244, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760 10.1126/science.aao3760] .</span> ----- Rockström, J. et al., 2017: A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. ''Science'' , '''355(6331)''' , 1269–1271, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443 10.1126/science.aah3443] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r525">Michaelowa, A., M. Allen, and F. Sha, 2018: Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 275–286, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977] .</span> ----- Veland, S. et al., 2018: Narrative matters for sustainability: the transformative role of storytelling in realizing 1.5°C futures. ''Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability'' , '''31''' , 41–47, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.005 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.005] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r526">Grubb, M., J.C. Hourcade, and K. Neuhoff, 2014: ''Planetary economics: Energy, climate change and the three domains of sustainable development'' . Routledge Earthscan, Abingdon, UK and New York, NY, USA, 520 pp.</span> ----- Patt, A., 2017: Beyond the tragedy of the commons: Reframing effective climate change governance. ''Energy Research & Social Science'' , '''34''' , 1–3, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.023 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.023] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r527">Geels, F.W., B.K. Sovacool, T. Schwanen, and S. Sorrell, 2017: Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. ''Science'' , '''357(6357)''' , 1242–1244, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760 10.1126/science.aao3760] .</span> ----- Michaelowa, A., M. Allen, and F. Sha, 2018: Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 275–286, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r528">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r529">Boardman, A.E., D.H. Greenberg, A.R. Vining, and D.L. Weimer, 2006: ''Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice (3rd edition)'' . Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 560 pp.</span> ----- Stern, N., 2007: ''The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review'' . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 692 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817434 10.1017/cbo9780511817434] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r530">Nordhaus, W.D., 2014: Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon: Concepts and Results from the DICE-2013R Model and Alternative Approaches. ''Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists'' , '''1(1–2)''' , 273–312, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/676035 10.1086/676035] .</span> ----- Pizer, W. et al., 2014: Using and improving the social cost of carbon. ''Science'' , '''346(6214)''' , 1189–1190, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259774 10.1126/science.1259774] . ----- Rose, S.K., D.B. Diza, and G.J. Blanford, 2017a: Understanding the Social Cost of Carbon: A Model diagnostic and Inter-comparison Study. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''8(2)''' , 1750009, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007817500099 10.1142/s2010007817500099] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r531">Rose, S.K., 2012: The role of the social cost of carbon in policy. ''Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change'' , '''3(2)''' , 195–212, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.163 10.1002/wcc.163] .</span> ----- NASEM, 2016: ''Assessment of Approaches to Updating the Social Cost of Carbon: Phase 1 Report on a Near-Term Update'' . National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, 72 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.17226/21898 10.17226/21898] . ----- NASEM, 2017: ''Valuing Climate Damages: Updating estimation of the social costs of carbon dioxide'' . National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, 262 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.17226/24651 10.17226/24651] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r532">Kolstad, C. et al., 2014: Social, Economic and Ethical Concepts and Methods. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadne, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 207–282.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r533">Kolstad, C. et al., 2014: Social, Economic and Ethical Concepts and Methods. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadne, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 207–282.</span> ----- Pizer, W. et al., 2014: Using and improving the social cost of carbon. ''Science'' , '''346(6214)''' , 1189–1190, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259774 10.1126/science.1259774] . ----- Adler, M.D. and N. Treich, 2015: Prioritarianism and Climate Change. ''Environmental and Resource Economics'' , '''62(2)''' , 279–308, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9960-7 10.1007/s10640-015-9960-7] . ----- Adler, M.D. et al., 2017: Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(6)''' , 443–449, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3298 10.1038/nclimate3298] . ----- NASEM, 2017: ''Valuing Climate Damages: Updating estimation of the social costs of carbon dioxide'' . National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, 262 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.17226/24651 10.17226/24651] . ----- Nordhaus, W.D., 2017: Revisiting the social cost of carbon. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(7)''' , 1518–1523, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609244114 10.1073/pnas.1609244114] . ----- Rose, S.K., D.B. Diza, and G.J. Blanford, 2017a: Understanding the Social Cost of Carbon: A Model diagnostic and Inter-comparison Study. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''8(2)''' , 1750009, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007817500099 10.1142/s2010007817500099] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r534">Pindyck, R.S., 2013: Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us? ''Journal of Economic Literature'' , '''51(3)''' , 1–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.860 10.1257/jel.51.3.860] .</span> ----- Stern, N., 2013: The Structure of Economic Modeling of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change: Grafting Gross Underestimation of Risk onto Already Narrow Science Models. ''Journal of Economic Literature'' , '''51(3)''' , 838–859, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.838 10.1257/jel.51.3.838] . ----- Revesz, R. et al., 2014: Global warming: Improve economic models of climate change. ''Nature'' , '''508(7495)''' , 173–175, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/508173a 10.1038/508173a] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r535">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r536">Weyant, J., 2017: Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change. ''Review of Environmental Economics and Policy'' , '''11(1)''' , 115–137, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew018 10.1093/reep/rew018] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r537">Fujimori, S., 2017: SSP3: AIM Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 268–283, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r538">Thomson, A.M. et al., 2011: RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1–2)''' , 77–94, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4] .</span> ----- Calvin, K. et al., 2017: The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 284–296, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r539">van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2011b: RCP2.6: Exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1)''' , 95–116, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3 10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2017b: Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 237–250, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r540">Riahi, K. et al., 2011: RCP 8.5 – A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. ''Climatic Change'' , '''109(1)''' , 33, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y] .</span> ----- Havlík, P. et al., 2014: Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''111(10)''' , 3709–3714, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308044111 10.1073/pnas.1308044111] . ----- Fricko, O. et al., 2017: The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 251–267, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r541">Popp, A., H. Lotze-Campen, and B. Bodirsky, 2010: Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO <sub>2</sub> greenhouse gases from agricultural production. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''20(3)''' , 451–462, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001] .</span> ----- Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2017: Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 297–315, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r542">Bosetti, V., C. Carraro, M. Galeotti, E. Massetti, and M. Tavoni, 2006: WITCH – A World Induced Technical Change Hybrid Model. ''The Energy Journal'' , '''27''' , 13–37, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23297044 .</span> ----- Bosetti, V., C. Carraro, E. Massetti, and M. Tavoni, 2008: International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization. ''Energy Economics'' , '''30(6)''' , 2912–2929, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.04.008 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.04.008] . ----- Bosetti, V., C. Carraro, A. Sgobbi, and M. Tavoni, 2009: Delayed action and uncertain stabilisation targets. How much will the delay cost? ''Climatic Change'' , '''96(3)''' , 299–312, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9630-2 10.1007/s10584-009-9630-2] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r543">Rose, S.K., D.B. Diza, and G.J. Blanford, 2017a: Understanding the Social Cost of Carbon: A Model diagnostic and Inter-comparison Study. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''8(2)''' , 1750009, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007817500099 10.1142/s2010007817500099] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r544">Nordhaus, W.D. and J. Boyer, 2000: ''Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming'' . MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK, 244 pp.</span> ----- Nordhaus, W.D., 2013: ''The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World'' . Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA, 392 pp. ----- Nordhaus, W.D., 2017: Revisiting the social cost of carbon. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''114(7)''' , 1518–1523, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609244114 10.1073/pnas.1609244114] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r545">Hope, C., 2006: The Marginal Impact of CO <sub>2</sub> from PAGE2002: An Integrated Assessment Model Incorporating the IPCC’s Five Reasons for Concern. ''The Integrated Assessment Journal'' , '''6(1)''' , 19–56, http://journals.sfu.ca/int_assess/index.php/iaj/article/viewarticle/227 .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r546">Tol, R.S.J., 1999: Spatial and Temporal Efficiency in Climate Policy: Applications of FUND. ''Environmental and Resource Economics'' , '''14(1)''' , 33–49, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1008314205375 10.1023/a:1008314205375] .</span> ----- Anthoff, D. and R.S.J. Tol, 2009: The impact of climate change on the balanced growth equivalent: An application of FUND. ''Environmental and Resource Economics'' , '''43(3)''' , 351–367, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9269-5 10.1007/s10640-009-9269-5] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r547">Kolstad, C. et al., 2014: Social, Economic and Ethical Concepts and Methods. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadne, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 207–282.</span> ----- Revesz, R. et al., 2014: Global warming: Improve economic models of climate change. ''Nature'' , '''508(7495)''' , 173–175, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/508173a 10.1038/508173a] . ----- NASEM, 2017: ''Valuing Climate Damages: Updating estimation of the social costs of carbon dioxide'' . National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, 262 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.17226/24651 10.17226/24651] . ----- Rose, S.K., D.B. Diza, and G.J. Blanford, 2017a: Understanding the Social Cost of Carbon: A Model diagnostic and Inter-comparison Study. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''8(2)''' , 1750009, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007817500099 10.1142/s2010007817500099] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r548">Ackerman, F. and E.A. Stanton, 2012: Climate Risks and Carbon Prices: Revising the Social Cost of Carbon. ''Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal'' , '''6(2012-10)''' , 1–25, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-10 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-10] .</span> ----- Revesz, R. et al., 2014: Global warming: Improve economic models of climate change. ''Nature'' , '''508(7495)''' , 173–175, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/508173a 10.1038/508173a] . ----- Moore, F.C. and D.B. Diaz, 2015: Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(1)''' , 127–132, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2481 10.1038/nclimate2481] . ----- Stern, N., 2016: Current climate models are grossly misleading. ''Nature'' , '''530''' , 407–409, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/530407a 10.1038/530407a] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r549">Hsiang, S. et al., 2017: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. ''Science'' , '''356(6345)''' , 1362–1369, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4369 10.1126/science.aal4369] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r550">Dell, M., B.F. Jones, and B.A. Olken, 2014: What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate–Economy Literature. ''Journal of Economic Literature'' , '''52(3)''' , 740–798, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24434109 .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r551">Lemoine, D. and C. Traeger, 2014: Watch Your Step: Optimal Policy in a Tipping Climate. ''American Economic Journal: Economic Policy'' , '''6(1)''' , 137–166, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.1.137 10.1257/pol.6.1.137] .</span> ----- Cai, Y., K.L. Judd, T.M. Lenton, T.S. Lontzek, and D. Narita, 2015: Environmental tipping points significantly affect the cost-benefit assessment of climate policies. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''112(15)''' , 4606–4611, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503890112 10.1073/pnas.1503890112] . ----- Lontzek, T.S., Y. Cai, K.L. Judd, and T.M. Lenton, 2015: Stochastic integrated assessment of climate tipping points indicates the need for strict climate policy. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(5)''' , 441–444, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2570 10.1038/nclimate2570] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r552">Nordhaus, W.D., 2007a: A Review of The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. ''Journal of Economic Literature'' , '''45(3)''' , 686–702, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/27646843 http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646843] .</span> ----- Stern, N., 2007: ''The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review'' . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 692 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817434 10.1017/cbo9780511817434] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r553">Schmidt, M.G.W., H. Held, E. Kriegler, and A. Lorenz, 2013: Climate Policy Under Uncertain and Heterogeneous Climate Damages. ''Environmental and Resource Economics'' , '''54(1)''' , 79–99, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9582-2 10.1007/s10640-012-9582-2] .</span> ----- Dennig, F., M.B. Budolfson, M. Fleurbaey, A. Siebert, and R.H. Socolow, 2015: Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''112(52)''' , 15827–15832, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513967112 10.1073/pnas.1513967112] . ----- Adler, M.D. et al., 2017: Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''7(6)''' , 443–449, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3298 10.1038/nclimate3298] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r554">Pizer, W. et al., 2014: Using and improving the social cost of carbon. ''Science'' , '''346(6214)''' , 1189–1190, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259774 10.1126/science.1259774] .</span> ----- Revesz, R. et al., 2014: Global warming: Improve economic models of climate change. ''Nature'' , '''508(7495)''' , 173–175, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/508173a 10.1038/508173a] . ----- Stiglitz, J.E. et al., 2017: ''Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices'' . Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), 68 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r555">Stiglitz, J.E. et al., 2017: ''Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices'' . Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), 68 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r556">NASEM, 2017: ''Valuing Climate Damages: Updating estimation of the social costs of carbon dioxide'' . National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, 262 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.17226/24651 10.17226/24651] .</span> ----- Rose, S.K., D.B. Diza, and G.J. Blanford, 2017a: Understanding the Social Cost of Carbon: A Model diagnostic and Inter-comparison Study. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''8(2)''' , 1750009, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007817500099 10.1142/s2010007817500099] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r557">Sarofim, M.C., S.T. Waldhoff, and S.C. Anenberg, 2017: Valuing the Ozone-Related Health Benefits of Methane Emission Controls. ''Environmental and Resource Economics'' , '''66(1)''' , 45–63, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9937-6 10.1007/s10640-015-9937-6] .</span> ----- Shindell, D.T., J.S. Fuglestvedt, and W.J. Collins, 2017a: The social cost of methane: theory and applications. ''Faraday Discussions'' , '''200''' , 429–451, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7fd00009j 10.1039/c7fd00009j] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r558">Luderer, G. et al., 2018: Residual fossil CO <sub>2</sub> emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(7)''' , 626–633, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6] .</span> ----- McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r559">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2015b: Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 24–44, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2015c: Mitigation choices impact carbon budget size compatible with low temperature goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(7)''' , 075003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075003] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Stiglitz, J.E. et al., 2017: ''Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices'' . Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), 68 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r560">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510. ----- Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2015: Locked into Copenhagen pledges – Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 8–23, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2015c: Mitigation choices impact carbon budget size compatible with low temperature goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''10(7)''' , 075003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075003 10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075003] . ----- Luderer, G., C. Bertram, K. Calvin, E. De Cian, and E. Kriegler, 2016a: Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways. ''Climatic Change'' , '''136(1)''' , 127–140, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9 10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r561">Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] .</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2015a: Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 45–61, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.020 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.020] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r562">Bauer, N. et al., 2018: Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison. ''Climatic Change'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r563">Guivarch, C. and J. Rogelj, 2017: ''Carbon price variations in 2°C scenarios explored'' . Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), 15 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r564">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2015b: Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 24–44, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021] . ----- Weyant, J., 2017: Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change. ''Review of Environmental Economics and Policy'' , '''11(1)''' , 115–137, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew018 10.1093/reep/rew018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r565">Tavoni, M. and R.S.J. Tol, 2010: Counting only the hits? The risk of underestimating the costs of stringent climate policy. ''Climatic Change'' , '''100(3–4)''' , 769–778, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9867-9 10.1007/s10584-010-9867-9] .</span> ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510. ----- Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] . ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2015a: Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 45–61, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.020 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.020] . ----- Guivarch, C. and J. Rogelj, 2017: ''Carbon price variations in 2°C scenarios explored'' . Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), 15 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r566">Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] .</span> ----- Kriegler, E. et al., 2015b: Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 24–44, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021] . ----- Akimoto, K., F. Sano, and T. Tomoda, 2017: GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5°C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways. ''Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change'' , 1–14, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z 10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r567">Bauer, N. et al., 2017: Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 316–330, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006] .</span> ----- Guivarch, C. and J. Rogelj, 2017: ''Carbon price variations in 2°C scenarios explored'' . Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), 15 pp. ----- Hof, A.F. et al., 2017: Global and regional abatement costs of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2°C and 1.5°C. ''Environmental Science & Policy'' , '''71''' , 30–40, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.008 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.008] . ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r568">Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r569">Rogelj, J. et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 325–332, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r570">Luderer, G. et al., 2013: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''8(3)''' , 034033, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033] .</span> ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</li> <li><span id="fn:r571">Kriegler, E. et al., 2015b: Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 24–44, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r572">Nordhaus, W.D., 2007b: To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slowing Global Warming. ''Review of Environmental Economics and Policy'' , '''1(1)''' , 26–44, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem008 10.1093/reep/rem008] .</span> ----- Stern, N., 2007: ''The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review'' . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 692 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817434 10.1017/cbo9780511817434] . ----- Aldy, J.E. and R.N. Stavins, 2012: The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon. ''The Journal of Environment & Development'' , '''21(2)''' , 152–180, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442508 10.1177/1070496512442508] . ----- Goulder, L. and A. Schein, 2013: Carbon Taxes vs. Cap and Trade: A Critical Review. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''04(03)''' , 1350010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007813500103 10.1142/s2010007813500103] . ----- Somanthan, E. et al., 2014: National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1141–1206. ----- Weitzman, M.L., 2014: Can Negotiating a Uniform Carbon Price Help to Internalize the Global Warming Externality? ''Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists'' , '''1(1/2)''' , 29–49, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/676039 10.1086/676039] . ----- Tol, R.S.J., 2017: The structure of the climate debate. ''Energy Policy'' , '''104''' , 431–438, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.005 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.005] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r573">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Riahi, K. et al., 2017: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 153–168, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009] . ----- Weyant, J., 2017: Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change. ''Review of Environmental Economics and Policy'' , '''11(1)''' , 115–137, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew018 10.1093/reep/rew018] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r574">Kriegler, E. et al., 2018a: Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(7)''' , 074022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r575">Brown, M.A. and Y. Li, 2018: Carbon pricing and energy efficiency: pathways to deep decarbonization of the US electric sector. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–19, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9686-9 10.1007/s12053-018-9686-9] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r576">Bertram, C. et al., 2015b: Complementing carbon prices with technology policies to keep climate targets within reach. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(3)''' , 235–239, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2514 10.1038/nclimate2514] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r577">Méjean, A., C. Guivarch, J. Lefèvre, and M. Hamdi-Cherif, 2018: The transition in energy demand sectors to limit global warming to 1.5°C. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–22, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9682-0 10.1007/s12053-018-9682-0] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r578">Sonnenschein, J., R. Van Buskirk, J.L. Richter, and C. Dalhammar, 2018: Minimum energy performance standards for the 1.5°C target: an effective complement to carbon pricing. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–16, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9669-x 10.1007/s12053-018-9669-x] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r579">Baranzini, A. et al., 2017: Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. ''Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , e462, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.462 10.1002/wcc.462] .</span> ----- OECD, 2017: ''Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth'' . OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 314 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273528-en 10.1787/9789264273528-en] . ----- McFarland, J.R., A.A. Fawcett, A.C. Morris, J.M. Reilly, and P.J. Wilcoxen, 2018: Overview of the EMF 32 Study on U.S. Carbon Tax Scenarios. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''9(1)''' , 1840002, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s201000781840002x 10.1142/s201000781840002x] . ----- Sands, R.D., 2018: U.S. Carbon Tax Scenarios and Bioenergy. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''9(1)''' , 1840010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007818400109 10.1142/s2010007818400109] . ----- Siegmeier, J. et al., 2018: The fiscal benefits of stringent climate change mitigation: an overview. ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 352–367, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1400943 10.1080/14693062.2017.1400943] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r580">Sands, R.D., 2018: U.S. Carbon Tax Scenarios and Bioenergy. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''9(1)''' , 1840010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007818400109 10.1142/s2010007818400109] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r581">Sands, R.D., 2018: U.S. Carbon Tax Scenarios and Bioenergy. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''9(1)''' , 1840010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007818400109 10.1142/s2010007818400109] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r582">Stiglitz, J.E. et al., 2017: ''Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices'' . Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), 68 pp.</span> ----- Mehling, M. and E. Tvinnereim, 2018: Carbon Pricing and the 1.5°C Target: Near-Term Decarbonisation and the Importance of an Instrument Mix. ''Carbon & Climate Law Review'' , '''12(1)''' , 50–61, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2018/1/9 10.21552/cclr/2018/1/9] . ----- Méjean, A., C. Guivarch, J. Lefèvre, and M. Hamdi-Cherif, 2018: The transition in energy demand sectors to limit global warming to 1.5°C. ''Energy Efficiency'' , 1–22, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9682-0 10.1007/s12053-018-9682-0] . ----- Michaelowa, A., M. Allen, and F. Sha, 2018: Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? ''Climate Policy'' , '''18(3)''' , 275–286, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r583">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r584">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2013: Energy Investments under Climate Policy: A Comparison of Global Models. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''4(4)''' , 1340010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007813400101 10.1142/s2010007813400101] .</span> ----- Bowen, A., E. Campiglio, and M. Tavoni, 2014: A macroeconomic perspective on climate change mitigation: Meeting the financing challenge. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''5(1)''' , 1440005, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007814400053 10.1142/s2010007814400053] . ----- Gupta, S. and J. Harnisch, 2014: Cross-cutting Investment and Finance Issues. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1207–1246. ----- Marangoni, G. and M. Tavoni, 2014: The Clean Energy R&D Strategy for 2°C. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''5(1)''' , 1440003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s201000781440003x 10.1142/s201000781440003x] . ----- OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r585">IEA, 2017c: ''World Energy Investment 2017'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 191 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r586">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r587">IEA, 2017c: ''World Energy Investment 2017'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 191 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r588">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2013: Energy Investments under Climate Policy: A Comparison of Global Models. ''Climate Change Economics'' , '''4(4)''' , 1340010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007813400101 10.1142/s2010007813400101] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r589">Grubler, A. and C. Wilson (eds.), 2014: ''Energy Technology Innovation: Learning from Historical Successes and Failures'' . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 400 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139150880 10.1017/cbo9781139150880] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r590">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r591">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r592">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r593">IEA, 2016b: ''World Energy Investment 2016'' . International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 177 pp.</span> ----- Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre/BNEF, 2017: ''Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2017'' . Frankfurt School of Finance & Management gGmbH, Frankfurt, Germany, 90 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r594">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r595">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r596">Bertram, C. et al., 2015a: Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90(Part A)''' , 62–72, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001] .</span> ----- Johnson, N. et al., 2015: Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''90''' , 89–102, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.028 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.028] . ----- OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</li> <li><span id="fn:r597">Iyer, G.C. et al., 2015: Improved representation of investment decisions in assessments of CO <sub>2</sub> mitigation. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''5(5)''' , 436–440, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2553 10.1038/nclimate2553] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r598">Bosetti, V. and D.G. Victor, 2011: Politics and Economics of Second-Best Regulation of Greenhouse Gases: The Importance of Regulatory Credibility. ''The Energy Journal'' , '''32(1)''' , 1–24, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/41323391 http://www.jstor.org/stable/41323391] .</span> ----- Faehn, T. and E. Isaksen, 2016: Diffusion of Climate Technologies in the Presence of Commitment Problems. ''The Energy Journal'' , '''37(2)''' , 155–180, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.2.tfae 10.5547/01956574.37.2.tfae] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r599">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r600">Krey, V. et al., 2014b: Annex II: Metrics & Methodology. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1281–1328.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r601">Fricko, O. et al., 2017: The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 251–267, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r602">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r603">Fankhauser, S., A. Sahni, A. Savvas, and J. Ward, 2016: Where are the gaps in climate finance? ''Climate and Development'' , '''8(3)''' , 203–206, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1064811 10.1080/17565529.2015.1064811] .</span> ----- OECD, 2017: ''Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth'' . OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 314 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273528-en 10.1787/9789264273528-en] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r604">UNEP, 2015: ''Aligning the Financial System with Sustainable Development: Pathways to Scale'' . Inquiry: Design of a Sustainable Financial System and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Geneva, Switzerland, 25 pp.</span> ----- OECD, 2017: ''Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth'' . OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 314 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273528-en 10.1787/9789264273528-en] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r605">Mundaca, L., M. Mansoz, L. Neij, and G. Timilsina, 2013: Transaction costs analysis of low-carbon technologies. ''Climate Policy'' , '''13(4)''' , 490–513, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.781452 10.1080/14693062.2013.781452] .</span> ----- Brunner, S. and K. Enting, 2014: Climate finance: A transaction cost perspective on the structure of state-to-state transfers. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''27''' , 138–143, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.005 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.005] . ----- Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r606">Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510.</span> ----- Mundaca, L., L. Neij, A. Markandya, P. Hennicke, and J. Yan, 2016: Towards a Green Energy Economy? Assessing policy choices, strategies and transitional pathways. ''Applied Energy'' , '''179''' , 1283–1292, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.086 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.086] . ----- EC, 2017: ''High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance interim report – Financing a sustainable European economy'' . European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 72 pp. ----- OECD, 2017: ''Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth'' . OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 314 pp., doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273528-en 10.1787/9789264273528-en] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r607">Harmes, A., 2011: The Limits of Carbon Disclosure: Theorizing the Business Case for Investor Environmentalism. ''Global Environmental Politics'' , '''11(2)''' , 98–119, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00057 10.1162/glep_a_00057] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r608">McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r609">OECD/IEA and IRENA, 2017: ''Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System'' . OECD/IEA and IRENA, 204 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r610">Shindell, D.T. et al., 2017b: A climate policy pathway for near- and long-term benefits. ''Science'' , '''356(6337)''' , 493–494, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aak9521 10.1126/science.aak9521] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r611">Painter, T.H. et al., 2013: End of the Little Ice Age in the Alps forced by industrial black carbon. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' , '''110(38)''' , 15216–21, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302570110 10.1073/pnas.1302570110] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r612">Jacobson, M.Z., 2002: Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming. ''Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres'' , '''107(D19)''' , 4410, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001376 10.1029/2001jd001376] .</span> ----- Jacobson, M.Z., 2010: Short-term effects of controlling fossil-fuel soot, biofuel soot and gases, and methane on climate, Arctic ice, and air pollution health. ''Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres'' , '''115(D14)''' , D14209, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013795 10.1029/2009jd013795] . ----- Anenberg, S.C. et al., 2012: Global Air Quality and Health Co-benefits of Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change through Methane and Black Carbon Emission Controls. ''Environmental Health Perspectives'' , '''120(6)''' , 831–839, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104301 10.1289/ehp.1104301] . ----- Shindell, D.T. et al., 2012: Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security. ''Science'' , '''335(6065)''' , 183–189, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026 10.1126/science.1210026] . ----- Stohl, A. et al., 2015: Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''15(18)''' , 10529–10566, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015 10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015] . ----- Collins, W.J. et al., 2018: Increased importance of methane reduction for a 1.5 degree target. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''13(5)''' , 054003, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab89c 10.1088/1748-9326/aab89c] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r613">Grubler, A. et al., 2018: A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(6)''' , 515–527, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6] .</span> ----- van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2018: Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(5)''' , 391–397, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r614">Shindell, D.T., G. Faluvegi, K. Seltzer, and C. Shindell, 2018: Quantified, localized health benefits of accelerated carbon dioxide emissions reductions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 291–295, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0108-y 10.1038/s41558-018-0108-y] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r615">Silva, R.A. et al., 2016: The effect of future ambient air pollution on human premature mortality to 2100 using output from the ACCMIP model ensemble. ''Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics'' , '''16(15)''' , 9847–9862, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9847-2016 10.5194/acp-16-9847-2016] .</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r616">West, J.J. et al., 2013: Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''3(10)''' , 885–889, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2009 10.1038/nclimate2009] .</span> ----- Shindell, D.T., G. Faluvegi, K. Seltzer, and C. Shindell, 2018: Quantified, localized health benefits of accelerated carbon dioxide emissions reductions. ''Nature Climate Change'' , '''8(4)''' , 291–295, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0108-y 10.1038/s41558-018-0108-y] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r617">Rao, S. et al., 2016: A multi-model assessment of the co-benefits of climate mitigation for global air quality. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(12)''' , 124013, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124013 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124013] .</span> ----- Rao, S. et al., 2017: Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways. ''Global Environmental Change'' , '''42''' , 346–358, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r618">Shukla, P.R. and V. Chaturvedi, 2012: Low carbon and clean energy scenarios for India: Analysis of targets approach. ''Energy Economics'' , '''34(sup3)''' , S487–S495, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.05.002 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.05.002] .</span> ----- Clarke, L. et al., 2014: Assessing transformation pathways. In: ''Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 413–510. ----- McCollum, D.L. et al., 2018: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. ''Nature Energy'' , '''3(7)''' , 589–599, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r619">van Vuuren, D.P. et al., 2015: Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. ''Technological Forecasting and Social Change'' , '''98''' , 303–323, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.005 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.005] .</span> ----- Hildingsson, R. and B. Johansson, 2016: Governing low-carbon energy transitions in sustainable ways: Potential synergies and conflicts between climate and environmental policy objectives. ''Energy Policy'' , '''88''' , 245–252, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.029 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.029] . ----- Jakob, M. and J.C. Steckel, 2016: Implications of climate change mitigation for sustainable development. ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(10)''' , 104010, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/104010 10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/104010] . ----- von Stechow, C. et al., 2016: 2°C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall? ''Environmental Research Letters'' , '''11(3)''' , 034022, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034022 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034022] . ----- Delponte, I., I. Pittaluga, and C. Schenone, 2017: Monitoring and evaluation of Sustainable Energy Action Plan: Practice and perspective. ''Energy Policy'' , '''100''' , 9–17, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.003 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.003] .</li> <li><span id="fn:r620">UNFCCC, 2016: ''Aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: an update'' . FCCC/CP/2016/2, The Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Bonn, Germany, 75 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r621">UNFCCC, 2016: ''Aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: an update'' . FCCC/CP/2016/2, The Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Bonn, Germany, 75 pp.</span></li> <li><span id="fn:r622">Kandlikar, M., 1995: The relative role of trace gas emissions in greenhouse abatement policies. ''Energy Policy'' , '''23(10)''' , 879–883, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(95)00108-u 10.1016/0301-4215(95)00108-u] .</span> ----- Marten, A.L., E.A. Kopits, C.W. Griffiths, S.C. Newbold, and A. Wolverton, 2015: Incremental CH <sub>4</sub> and N <sub>2</sub> O mitigation benefits consistent with the US Government’s SC-CO <sub>2</sub> estimates. ''Climate Policy'' , '''15(2)''' , 272–298, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.912981 10.1080/14693062.2014.912981] . ----- Shindell, D.T., 2015: The social cost of atmospheric release. ''Climatic Change'' , '''130(2)''' , 313–326, doi: [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0 10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0] . ----- IWG, 2016: ''Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866'' . Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, United States, 35 pp.</li></ol> <span id="section-18"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SR15/Chapter-2
(section)
Add languages
Add topic
