Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-9
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 9.8.2.3 Outdoor Air Pollution ==== <div id="h3-26-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> According to World Health Organization (2018) around 4.2 million premature deaths worldwide (in both cities and rural areas) are attributed to outdoor air pollution. According to the results of the quantitative model ( [[#Gu--2018|Gu et al. 2018]] ), the premature mortalities attributed to PM 2.5 and O 3 emissions may reach 168000β1796000 (95% Cl) in 2010. Mitigation actions in residential and non-residential sectors decrease the amount of fossil fuels burnt either directly in buildings (for heating, cooking, etc.) or indirectly for electricity generation and thereby reduce air pollution (e.g., PM, O 3 , SO 2 , NO x ), improve ambient air quality and generate significant health benefits through avoiding premature deaths, lung cancers, ischemic heart diseases, hospital admissions, asthma exacerbations, respiratory symptoms, and so on ( [[#Levy--2016|Levy et al. 2016]] ; [[#Balaban--2017|Balaban and Puppim de Oliveira 2017]] ; [[#MacNaughton--2018|MacNaughton et al. 2018]] ; [[#Karlsson--2020|Karlsson et al. 2020]] ). Several studies have monetised the health benefits attributed to reduced outdoor air pollution due to the implementation of mitigation actions in buildings, and their magnitude expressed as a ratio to the value of energy savings resulting from the implemented interventions in each case, are in the range of 0.08 in EU, 0.18 in Germany, 0.26β0.40 in US, 0.34 in Brazil, 0.47 in Mexico, 0.74 in Turkey, 8.28 in China and 11.67 in India ( [[#Joyce--2013|Joyce et al. 2013]] ; [[#Levy--2016|Levy et al. 2016]] ; [[#Diaz-Mendez--2018|Diaz-Mendez et al. 2018]] ; [[#MacNaughton--2018|MacNaughton et al. 2018]] ). In developed economies, the estimated co-benefits are relatively low due to the fact that the planned interventions influence a quite clean energy source mix ( [[#Tuomisto--2015|Tuomisto et al. 2015]] ; [[#MacNaughton--2018|MacNaughton et al. 2018]] ). On the other hand, the health co-benefits in question are substantially higher in countries and regions with greater dependency on coal for electricity generation and higher baseline morbidity and mortality rates ( [[#Kheirbek--2014|Kheirbek et al. 2014]] ; [[#MacNaughton--2018|MacNaughton et al. 2018]] ). <div id="9.8.3" class="h2-container"></div> <span id="other-environmental-benefits-of-mitigation-actions"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-9
(section)
Add languages
Add topic