Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-6
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 6.6.3.1 Climate Response to Past AQ Policies ==== <div id="h3-22-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Air-quality policies emerged several decades ago focusing on emissions mitigation, first driven by local- then by regional-scale air-quality and ecosystem-damage concerns, that is, health impacts, acidification and eutrophication. They have made it possible to reduce or limit pollution exposure in many megacities or highly populated regions, for example, in Los Angeles, Mexico City and Houston in North America ( [[#Parrish--2011|Parrish et al., 2011]] ), Santiago in Chile ( [[#Gallardo--2018|Gallardo et al., 2018]] ), São Paulo in Brazil ( [[#Andrade--2017|Andrade et al., 2017]] ), Europe ( [[#Reis--2012|Reis et al., 2012]] ; [[#Crippa--2016|Crippa et al., 2016]] ; [[#Serrano--2019|Serrano et al., 2019]] ), and over Eastern Asia during the last decade ( [[#Silver--2018|Silver et al., 2018]] ; [[#Zheng--2018b|Zheng et al., 2018b]] ). However, very few studies have quantified the impact of these policies on climate. The AR5 concluded that air-quality control will have consequences on climate including strong regional variability, however, no estimates of impacts of specific air-quality policy were available. Since AR5, few studies have provided estimates of climate-relevant indicators affected by significant air pollutant burden changes due to air-quality policy in selected regions. [[#Turnock--2016|Turnock et al. (2016)]] estimated that the strong decrease in NO <sub>x</sub> , SO <sub>2</sub> and PM <sub>2.5</sub> emissions in Europe, induced by air-quality policies resulting in implementation of abatement measures since the 1970s, have caused a surface warming of +0.45°C ± 0.11°C and increase of precipitation +13 ± 0.8 mm yr <sup>–1</sup> over Europe, compared to the scenario without such policies. While the temperature increase is likely overestimated since the impact of the increase in ammonium nitrate was not considered in this study, the simulated European all-sky TOA radiative effect of the European air pollutant mitigation over the period 1970–2009 is 2.5 times the change in global mean CO <sub>2</sub> radiative forcing over the same period ( [[#Myhre--2013|Myhre et al., 2013]] ). Other studies found that the recent measures to reduce pollution over China have induced a decrease of aerosols and increase of ozone over east China (K. [[#Li--2019|]] [[#Li--2019|Li et al., 2019]] , 2020), resulting in an overall warming effect mainly due to the dominant effect of sulphate reductions in the period 2012–2017 ( [[#Dang--2019|Dang and Liao, 2019]] ). <div id="6.6.3.2" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="recently-decided-slcf-relevant-global-legislation"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-6
(section)
Add languages
Add topic