Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-12
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 12.5.2.5 Challenges and Opportunities ==== <div id="h3-40-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> There is ''low evidence and high agreement'' that empowering local stakeholders (e.g., multi-lateral fisheries agreements) improves public awareness and simplifies regulations and increases the flexibility and sustainability of marine resources managed in fisheries under future scenarios ( [[#Weatherdon--2016|Weatherdon et al., 2016]] ; [[#Kalikoski--2019|Kalikoski et al., 2019]] ). Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a suitable tool to minimise the risk to climate change, avoid ecosystem degradation and related services ( [[#Gullestad--2017|Gullestad et al., 2017]] ). Further, when EBFM includes climate complexity and the relationships among species within the ecological systems it contributes to maintain long-term socioeconomic benefits ( [[#Long--2015|Long et al., 2015]] ). There is ''high confidence'' that EbA is more successful and feasible than hard coastal defences for the protection, management and restoration of ocean and coastal ecosystems and their resources ( [[#Spalding--2014|Spalding et al., 2014]] ; [[#González--2017|González and Holtmann-Ahumada, 2017]] ; [[#Scarano--2017|Scarano, 2017]] ). There is ''high confidence'' that ecological and social resilience is improved by the presence of adequate metrics to evaluate adaptation measures to allow dynamic changes; and by increasing basic research and climate data ( [[#Moreno--2020b|Moreno et al., 2020b]] ). Resilience also increases with the existence of EWSs, improved local institutions, the construction of adequate infrastructure, major funding for capacity building and the enhanced engagement and empowerment of women ( [[#FAO--2016b|FAO, 2016b]] ; [[#Harper--2017|Harper et al., 2017]] ; [[#Frangoudes--2018|Frangoudes and Gerrard, 2018]] ; [[#Gallardo-Fernández--2018|Gallardo-Fernández and Saunders, 2018]] ; [[#Leal%20Filho--2018|Leal Filho, 2018]] ). <div id="12.5.3" class="h2-container"></div> <span id="water"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-12
(section)
Add languages
Add topic