Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-10
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 10.4.6.4.2 Sustainable land-use planning and regulation ===== <div id="h4-21-siblings" class="h4-siblings"></div> Land use in cities impacts resource use (e.g., water, energy), risk (a function of population density, service provision and hazard exposure) and adaptive capacity, all of which influence the efficacy of urban adaptation ( [[#de%20Coninck--2018|de Coninck et al., 2018]] ). Locally suited land-use planning and regulation (such as appropriate zoning or building codes and safeguarding land rights) can have adaptation co-benefits ( [[#Mitchell--2015|Mitchell et al., 2015]] ; [[#Dhar--2016|Dhar and Khirfan, 2016]] ): for example, strict building regulations can protect urban wetlands and associated ecosystem services ( [[#Jiang--2015|Jiang et al., 2015]] ); appropriate land zoning can safeguard green spaces, ensure improvements in permeability and obviate new development in risk-prone locations ( [[#Duy--2019|Duy et al., 2019]] ); and ensuring tenurial security or regularising informal settlements can incentivise improvements to housing quality, thereby alleviating vulnerability of the most marginal people ( [[#Mitchell--2015|Mitchell et al., 2015]] ). Land tenure arrangements strongly shape urban dwellers’ vulnerability and their adaptive capacities ( [[#Roy--2013|Roy et al., 2013]] ; [[#Michael--2018|Michael et al., 2018]] ). For example, in Khulna (Bangladesh), Roy et al. (2013) found significant differences between the adaptive strategies of homeowners and renters in low-income settlements, a finding echoed in Bangalore (India) ( [[#Deshpande--2018|Deshpande et al., 2018]] ) and Phnom Penh (Cambodia) ( [[#Mitchell--2015|Mitchell et al., 2015]] ). In Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), land-based adaptation strategies include land zoning to control population and building density, demarcating environmental protection zones, and sub-urbanisation ( [[#Nahiduzzaman--2015|Nahiduzzaman et al., 2015]] ; [[#Rahman--2016|Rahman et al., 2016]] ). In many Asian cities, land subsidence control can serve as an adaptation strategy since it is estimated to significantly reduce relative SLR ( ''high confidence'' ). This has an important implication in that subsidence control would be a good and complementary measure to climate mitigation and climate adaptation in many coastal urban settings in Asia ( [[#Cao--2021|Cao et al., 2021]] ; [[#Nicholls--2021|Nicholls et al., 2021]] ). Urban land-use planning, if used proactively, can incentivise adaptation–mitigation synergies and obviate unintended negative consequences of urbanisation as [[#Xu--2019|Xu et al. (2019)]] have shown in Xiamen. <div id="10.4.6.4.3" class="h4-container"></div> <span id="ecosystem-based-adaptation"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-10
(section)
Add languages
Add topic