Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-5
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 5.5.1.2.1 Opportunities and challenges relating to coastal carbon ===== Estuaries, shelf seas and a wide range of other intertidal and shallow-water habitats (Section 5.3) play an important role in the global carbon cycle through their primary production by rooted plants, seaweeds (macroalgae) and phytoplankton, and also by processing riverine organic carbon. However, the natural carbon dynamics of these systems have been greatly changed by human activities (Regnier et al., 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1648|1648]]</sup> ; Cloern et al., 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r16|16]]</sup> 49; Day and Rybczyk, 2019 <sup>[[#fn:r1650|1650]]</sup> ) ( ''high confidence'' ). Direct anthropogenic impacts include coastal land-use change (Ramesh et al., 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1651|1651]]</sup> ; Li et al., 2018a <sup>[[#fn:r1652|1652]]</sup> ); indirect effects include increased nutrient delivery and other changes in river catchments (Jiao et al., 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1653|1653]]</sup> ; Regnier et al., 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1654|1654]]</sup> ), and marine resource exploitation in shelf seas (Bauer et al., 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1655|1655]]</sup> ). There is ''high confidence'' that these human-driven changes will continue, reflecting coastal settlement trends and global population growth (Barragán and de Andrés, 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1656|1656]]</sup> ) . Policy recognition of the mitigation benefits of coastal ecosystems requires quantitative information on their actual and potential carbon uptake and storage at the local and national scale, within an international framework for carbon accounting (Crooks et al., 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1657|1657]]</sup> ; Hejnowicz et al., 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1658|1658]]</sup> ). Such methods are being developed for coastal habitats structured by rooted plants (Needelman et al., 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1659|1659]]</sup> ; Troxler et al., 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1660|1660]]</sup> ; Needelman et al., 2019 <sup>[[#fn:r1661|1661]]</sup> ), considered here as ‘coastal vegetation’, linked to protocols for verification of longterm carbon removal and financial incentives (Crooks et al., 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1662|1662]]</sup> ; Hejnowicz et al., 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1663|1663]]</sup> ) and building on techniques used for managing terrestrial carbon sinks (Ahmed and Glaser, 2016b <sup>[[#fn:r1664|1664]]</sup> ; Aziz et al., 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1665|1665]]</sup> ). Proposals to apply carbon accounting to seaweeds, the water column and shelf sea sediments (Krause-Jensen and Duarte, 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1666|1666]]</sup> ; Zhang et al., 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1667|1667]]</sup> ) are less well-developed. <div id="section-5-5-1-2climate-mitigation-in-the-coastal-ocean-block-2"></div> <span id="coastal-vegetation-mangrove-salt-marsh-and-seagrass-ecosystems"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-5
(section)
Add languages
Add topic