Editing IPCC:AR6/WGI/TS (section)

== Footnotes ==

<div id="footnote-020" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-020-backlink|1]] In this Technical Summary, the following summary terms are used to describe the available evidence: limited, medium, or robust; and for the degree of agreement: low, medium, or high. A level of confidence is expressed using five qualifiers: very low, low, medium, high, and very high, and typeset in italics, e.g., ''medium confidence'' . For a given evidence and agreement statement, different confidence levels can be assigned, but increasing levels of evidence and degrees of agreement are correlated with increasing confidence (see Chapter 1, Box 1.1 for more details).

<div id="footnote-019" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-019-backlink|2]] In this Technical Summary, the following terms are used to indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: virtually certain 99–100% probability, very likely 90–100%, likely 66–100%, about as likely as not 33–66%, unlikely 0–33%, very unlikely 0–10%, exceptionally unlikely 0–1%. Additional terms (extremely likely : 95–100%, more likely than not &gt;50–100%, and extremely unlikely 0–5%) may also be used when appropriate. Assessed likelihood is typeset in italics, e.g., ''very likely'' (see Chapter 1, Box 1.1 for more details). Throughout the WGI report and unless stated otherwise, uncertainty is quantified using 90% uncertainty intervals. The 90% uncertainty interval, reported in square brackets [x to y], is estimated to have a 90% likelihood of covering the value that is being estimated. The range encompasses the median value, and there is an estimated 10% combined likelihood of the value being below the lower end of the range (x) and above its upper end (y). Often, the distribution will be considered symmetric about the corresponding best estimate, but this is not always the case. In this Report, an assessed 90% uncertainty interval is referred to as a ‘ ''very likely'' range’. Similarly, an assessed 66% uncertainty interval is referred to as a ‘ ''likely'' range’.

<div id="footnote-018" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-018-backlink|3]] The regional traceback matrices that provide the location of the assessment findings synthesized in Section TS.4 are in the Supplementary Material (SM) of Chapter 10.

<div id="footnote-017" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-017-backlink|4]] Data archive is available at https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/3234e9111d4f4354af00c3aaecd879b7 .

<div id="footnote-016" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-016-backlink|5]] https://interactive-atlas.ipcc.ch/

<div id="footnote-015" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-015-backlink|6]] The AR6 figures use one of the following approaches. For observations, the absence of ‘x’ symbols shows areas with statistical significance, while the presence of ‘x’ indicates non-significance. For model projections, the method offers two approaches with varying complexity. In the simple approach, ''high agreement'' (≥80%) is indicated with no overlay, and diagonal lines (///) show ''low agreement'' (&lt;80%); In the advanced approach, areas with no overlay display robust signal (≥66% of models show change greater than the variability threshold and ≥80% of all models agree on the sign of change), reverse diagonal lines () show no robust signal, and crossed lines show conflicting signals (i.e., significant change but ''low agreement''). Cross-Chapter Box Atlas.1 provides more information on the AR6 method for visualizing robustness and uncertainty on maps.

<div id="footnote-014" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-014-backlink|7]] Although not a core concept of the WGI Report, deep uncertainty is used in the Technical Summary in the following sense: ‘A situation of deep uncertainty exists when experts or stakeholders do not know or cannot agree on: (1) appropriate conceptual models that describe relationships among key driving forces in a system; (2) the probability distributions used to represent uncertainty about key variables and parameters; and/or (3) how to weigh and value desirable alternative outcomes’ (Lempert et al., 2003). Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., and Bankes, S. C. (2003). ''Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative long-term strategy analysis (MR-1626-RPC)'' . Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Pardee Center.

<div id="footnote-013" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-013-backlink|8]] The assessment covers scientific literature accepted for publication by 31 January 2021.

<div id="footnote-012" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-012-backlink|9]] Human influence on the climate system refers to human-driven activities that lead to changes in the climate system due to perturbations of Earth’s energy budget (also called anthropogenic forcing). Human influence results from emissions of greenhouse gases, aerosols and tropospheric ozone precursors, ozone-depleting substances, and land-use change.

<div id="footnote-011" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-011-backlink|10]] Throughout this Technical Summary, ‘main driver’ means responsible for more than 50% of the change.

<div id="footnote-010" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-010-backlink|11]] Throughout the WGI report and unless stated otherwise, uncertainty is quantified using 90% uncertainty intervals. The 90% uncertainty interval, reported in square brackets [x to y], is estimated to have a 90% likelihood of covering the value that is being estimated. The range encompasses the median value and there is an estimated 10% combined likelihood of the value being below the lower end of the range (x) and above its upper end (y). Often the distribution will be considered symmetric about the corresponding best estimate, but this is not always the case. In this Report, an assessed 90% uncertainty interval is referred to as a ‘ ''very likely'' range’. Similarly, an assessed 66% uncertainty interval is referred to as a ‘ ''likely'' range’.

<div id="footnote-009" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-009-backlink|12]] Increased stratification reduces the vertical exchange of heat, salinity, oxygen, carbon and nutrients. Stratification is an important indicator for ocean circulation.

<div id="footnote-008" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-008-backlink|13]] Several baselines or reference periods are used consistently throughout this Report. Baseline refers to a period against which anomalies (i.e., differences from the average value for the baseline period) are calculated. Examples include the 1750 baseline (used for anthropogenic radiative forcings), the 1850–1900 baseline (an approximation for pre-industrial global surface temperature from which global warming levels are calculated) and the 1995–2014 baseline (used for many climate model projections). A reference period indicates a time period over which various statistics are calculated (e.g., the near-term reference period, 2021–2040). Paleo reference periods are listed in Box TS.2. Links to chapters 1.4.1, Cross-Chapter Boxes 1.2 and 2.1

<div id="footnote-007" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-007-backlink|14]] Please refer to Section TS.1.3.1 for an overview of the climate change scenarios used in this Report.

<div id="footnote-006" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-006-backlink|15]] In this Report, equilibrium climate sensitivity is defined as the equilibrium (steady state) change in the surface temperature following a doubling of the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2) concentration from pre-industrial conditions.

<div id="footnote-005" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-005-backlink|16]] In this Report, transient climate response is defined as the surface temperature response for the hypothetical scenario in which atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2) increases at 1% yr <sup>–1</sup> from pre-industrial to the time of a doubling of atmospheric CO 2 concentration.

<div id="footnote-004" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-004-backlink|17]] Throughout this Report, scenarios are referred to as SSPx-y, where “SSPx” refers to the Shared Socio-economic Pathway or “SSP” describing the socio-economic trends underlying the scenario, and “y” refers to the approximate target level of radiative forcing (in W m <sup>–-2</sup>) resulting from the scenario in the year 2100.

<div id="footnote-003" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-003-backlink|18]] The transient surface temperature change per unit of cumulative CO 2 emissions, usually 1000 GtC.

<div id="footnote-002" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-002-backlink|19]] Throughout this Technical Summary, ‘main driver’ means responsible for more than 50% of the change.

<div id="footnote-001" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-001-backlink|20]] For reference, the Planck temperature response for a doubling of atmospheric CO 2 is approximately 1.2°C at equilibrium.

<div id="footnote-000" class="_idFootnote"></div>

[[#footnote-000-backlink|21]] Although cirrus cloud thinning aims to cool the planet by increasing longwave emissions to space, it is included in the portfolio of SRM options for consistency with AR5 and SR1.5. Links to chapters 4.6.3.3