Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-4
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 4.5.3.1.1 The Northern Annular Mode ===== <div id="h4-12-siblings" class="h4-siblings"></div> The AR5 assessed from CMIP5 simulations that the future boreal wintertime NAM is ''very likely'' to exhibit natural variability and forced trends of similar magnitude to that observed in the historical period and is ''likely'' to become slightly more positive in the future. Considerable uncertainty is related to physical mechanisms to explain the observed and projected changes in the NAM, but NAM trends are clearly closely connected to projected shifts in the mid-latitude jets and storm tracks. NAM projections from climate models analysed since AR5 reveal broadly similar results to the late 21st century. CMIP6 models show a positive ensemble-mean trend in most seasons and the higher emissions scenarios that is comparable to between-model or between-realization variability (Figure 4.30a). The NAM generally becomes more positive by the end of the century except in boreal summer (JJA) when there is no change in the NAM in these simulations. In boreal winter (DJF) under SSP5-8.5, the central estimate is an increase in the NAM by almost 3 hPa in the long-term compared to 1995β2014. This can be compared to a multi-model mean interannual standard deviation in the winter NAM index of 3.4 hPa during the period 1850β1900. We conclude with ''high confidence'' that in the mid- to long-term, the boreal wintertime surface NAM is more positive under SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5, while under SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6, the NAM does not show any robust change. <div id="_idContainer078" class="Basic-Text-Frame"></div> [[File:53baf3a96361d152ad7389c95f52a07d IPCC_AR6_WGI_Figure_4_30.png]] '''Figure 4.''' '''30 |''' '''CMIP6 Annular Mode index change from 1995β2014 to 2081β2100. (a)''' Northern Annular Mode (NAM) and '''(b)''' Southern Annular Mode (SAM). The NAM is defined as the difference in zonal mean SLP at 35Β°N and 65Β°N ( [[#Li--2003|Li and Wang, 2003]] ) and the SAM as the difference in zonal mean SLP at 40Β°S and 65Β°S ( [[#Gong--1999|Gong and Wang, 1999]] ). The shadings are the 5β95% ranges across the simulations. The numbers near the top are the numbers of model simulations in each SSP ensemble. Further details on data sources and processing are available in the chapter data table (Table 4.SM.1). <div id="4.5.3.1.2" class="h4-container"></div> <span id="the-southern-annular-mode-1"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-4
(section)
Add languages
Add topic