Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-Atlas
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== [[#Atlas.5.4.3|Atlas.5.4.3]] Assessment of Model Performance ==== <div id="h3-31-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Performance in simulating rainfall over South East Asia varies among CMIP5 GCMs ( ''high confidence'' ). Only some are capable of reasonably simulating the rainfall seasonal cycle and spatial pattern ( [[#Siew--2013|Siew et al., 2013]] ; [[#Raghavan--2018|Raghavan et al., 2018]] ). Over mainland South East Asia, the performance of CMIP5 GCMs in simulating rainfall during the wet season was superior to that for annual and dry-season precipitation (J. [[#Li--2019|]] [[#Li--2019|Li et al., 2019]] ). RCMs have been intensively used over the region in recent years in a series of single or multi-model experiments and there is ''medium confidence'' that they reproduce reasonably well seasonal climate patterns of temperature, precipitation and large-scale circulation over the different sub-regions of South East Asia with added values compared to their host GCMs ( [[#Kwan--2014|Kwan et al., 2014]] ; [[#Ngo-Duc--2014|Ngo-Duc et al., 2014]] , 2017; [[#Van%20Khiem--2014|Van Khiem et al., 2014]] ; [[#Juneng--2016|Juneng et al., 2016]] ; [[#Katzfey--2016|Katzfey et al., 2016]] ; [[#Loh--2016|Loh et al., 2016]] ; [[#Raghavan--2016|Raghavan et al., 2016]] ; [[#Cruz--2017|Cruz et al., 2017]] ; [[#Ratna--2017|Ratna et al., 2017]] ; [[#Trinh-Tuan--2018|Trinh-Tuan et al., 2018]] ; [[#Nguyen-Thuy--2021|Nguyen-Thuy et al., 2021]] ). RCM ensemble means tend to outperform the individual models in representing the climatological mean state ( [[#Ngo-Duc--2014|Ngo-Duc et al., 2014]] ; [[#Trinh-Tuan--2018|Trinh-Tuan et al., 2018]] ; [[#Nguyen-Thi--2021|Nguyen-Thi et al., 2021]] ). There is relatively high consistency among the simulations of historical climate over mainland South East Asia compared to those over the Maritime Continent for both seasonal and interannual variability ( [[#Ngo-Duc--2017|Ngo-Duc et al., 2017]] ). The consistency in rainfall simulations was lower than for temperature simulations. Some RCMs showed a systematic cold bias ( [[#Manomaiphiboon--2013|Manomaiphiboon et al., 2013]] ; [[#Kwan--2014|Kwan et al., 2014]] ; [[#Ngo-Duc--2014|Ngo-Duc et al., 2014]] ; [[#Loh--2016|Loh et al., 2016]] ; [[#Cruz--2017|Cruz and Sasaki, 2017]] ; [[#Cruz--2017|Cruz et al., 2017]] ) that was mainly due to model physics ( [[#Manomaiphiboon--2013|Manomaiphiboon et al., 2013]] ; [[#Kwan--2014|Kwan et al., 2014]] ) and/or the biases in the SST forcing ( [[#Ngo-Duc--2014|Ngo-Duc et al., 2014]] ). A few simulations revealed a warm bias over some areas such as in the Maritime Continent ( [[#Cruz--2017|Cruz et al., 2017]] ) or Vietnam ( [[#Van%20Khiem--2014|Van Khiem et al., 2014]] ). The biases for rainfall in GCMs and RCMs over South East Asia were found to be less systematic with wet or dry biases depending on the sub-regions ( [[#Manomaiphiboon--2013|Manomaiphiboon et al., 2013]] ; [[#Kwan--2014|Kwan et al., 2014]] ; [[#Van%20Khiem--2014|Van Khiem et al., 2014]] ; [[#Juneng--2016|Juneng et al., 2016]] ; Supari et al., 2020; [[#Tangang--2020|Tangang et al., 2020]] ; [[#Nguyen-Thi--2021|Nguyen-Thi et al., 2021]] ), although wet biases were more pronounced in RCMs ( [[#Kwan--2014|Kwan et al., 2014]] ; [[#Van%20Khiem--2014|Van Khiem et al., 2014]] ; [[#Kirono--2015|Kirono et al., 2015]] ; [[#Juneng--2016|Juneng et al., 2016]] ; Supari et al., 2020; [[#Tangang--2020|Tangang et al., 2020]] ). Some RCMs overestimated rainfall interannual variability ( [[#Juneng--2016|Juneng et al., 2016]] ) while some others underestimated it ( [[#Kirono--2015|Kirono et al., 2015]] ). Simulated rainfall amount is sensitive to the choice of convective scheme ( [[#Juneng--2016|Juneng et al., 2016]] ; [[#Ngo-Duc--2017|Ngo-Duc et al., 2017]] ) and the choice of land surface scheme ( [[#Chung--2018|Chung et al., 2018]] ). Rainfall biases in current climate simulations can be greatly reduced if a bias adjustment method such as quantile mapping is applied ( [[#Trinh-Tuan--2018|Trinh-Tuan et al., 2018]] ). The pattern of tropical cyclone numbers in the region were reasonable represented by RCM outputs ( [[#Van%20Khiem--2014|Van Khiem et al., 2014]] ; [[#Kieu-Thi--2016|Kieu-Thi et al., 2016]] ; [[#Herrmann--2020|Herrmann et al., 2020]] ). <div id="Atlas.5.4.4" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="atlas.5.4.4-assessment-and-synthesis-of-projections"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-Atlas
(section)
Add languages
Add topic