Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-6
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 6.7.3.2 Physical Energy System Lock-In ==== <div id="h3-35-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Current investments in fossil infrastructure have committed 500–700 GtCO 2 of emissions, creating significant risks for limiting warming to 1.5°C (Callaghan 2020) ( ''high confidence'' ). These current investments combined with emissions from proposed fossil infrastructure exceed the emissions required to limit warming to 1.5°C ( ''medium confidence'' ). Existing coal- and gas-fired electricity generation accounts for 200–300 GtCO 2 of committed emissions. Emissions from coal generation are larger than for gas plants ( [[#Smith--2019|Smith et al. 2019]] ; [[#Tong--2019|Tong et al. 2019]] ). The lifetime of coal-fired power plants is 25–50 years, creating long-lasting risks to climate goals ( [[#Erickson--2015|Erickson and Tempest 2015]] ). Gas-fired power plants are younger on average than coal-fired power plants. Industry sector lock-in amounts for more than 100 GtCO 2 , while buildings and transport sector together contribute another 50–100 GtCO 2 ( [[#Erickson--2015|Erickson and Tempest 2015]] ). Lock-in is also relevant to fossil resources. Both coal and gas exploration continue, and new permits are being issued, which may cause economic ( [[#Erickson--2018|Erickson et al. 2018]] ) as well as non-economic issues ( [[#Boettcher--2019|Boettcher et al. 2019]] ). The nature of lock-in varies across the energy system. For example, lock-in in urban and transport sectors is different from the electricity sector. Broadly, urban environments involve infrastructural, institutional, and behavioural lock-in ( [[#Ürge-Vorsatz--2018|Ürge-Vorsatz et al. 2018]] ). Addressing lock-in in these sectors requires action by multiple stakeholders and is unlikely with just technological evolution (Table 6.11). Committed carbon emissions are unevenly distributed. The disproportionate high share of committed emissions in emerging economies is the result of rapid growth in recent years, which has led to a comparably young fossil infrastructure with substantial remaining life ( [[#Shearer--2017|Shearer et al. 2017]] ). Mature industrialised countries tend to have older infrastructures, part of which will be up for retirement in the near future ( [[#Tong--2019|Tong et al. 2019]] ). Coal-fired power plants currently planned or under construction are associated with 150–300 GtCO 2 , of which about 75% and about 10% are located in Asia and the OECD respectively ( [[#Edenhofer--2018|Edenhofer et al. 2018]] ; [[#Pfeiffer--2018|Pfeiffer et al. 2018]] ). If implemented, these new fleets will further shorten all coal plants’ lifetimes by another 10 years for meeting climate goals ( [[#Cui--2019|Cui et al. 2019]] ). <div id="_idContainer093" class="Basic-Text-Frame"></div> [[File:20ae4946e03d27364072737297f50f7d IPCC_AR6_WGIII_Figure_6_34.png]] '''Figure 6.34 | Annual emissions from existing, proposed, and future energy system infrastructure.''' Source: with permission from [[#Tong--2019|Tong et al. 2019]] . Despite the imperative to reduce use of fossil fuels and the multiple health and other benefits from closing coal-based infrastructure ( [[#Portugal-Pereira--2018|Portugal-Pereira et al. 2018]] ; [[#Liu--2019a|Liu et al. 2019a]] ; Karlsson et al. 2020; [[#Rauner--2020|Rauner et al. 2020]] ; [[#Cui--2021|Cui et al. 2021]] ), coal power plants have continued to be commissioned globally ( [[#Jewell--2019|Jewell et al. 2019]] ; [[#Jakob--2020|Jakob et al. 2020]] ), most notably in Asian countries. Gas power plants also continue to be built. In many regions, new fossil electricity generation exceeds needed capacity ( [[#Shearer--2017|Shearer et al. 2017]] ). Existing policies and the NDCs are insufficient to prevent an increase in fossil infrastructure and associated carbon lock-in ( ''high confidence'' ) ( [[#Bertram--2015|Bertram et al. 2015]] ; [[#Johnson--2015|Johnson et al. 2015]] ). Current investment decisions are critical because there is limited room within the carbon budget required to limit warming to well below 2°C ( [[#Kalkuhl--2019|Kalkuhl et al. 2019]] ; [[#Rosenbloom--2019|Rosenbloom 2019]] ). Delays in mitigation will increase carbon lock-in and could result in large-scale stranded assets if stringency is subsequently increased to limit warming (Box 6.11). Near-term implementation of stringent GHG mitigation policies are likely to be most effective in reducing carbon lock-in ( [[#Haelg--2018|Haelg et al. 2018]] ). Near-term mitigation policies will also need to consider different energy transition strategies as a result of different resources and carbon budgets between countries ( [[#Lucas--2016|Lucas 2016]] ; [[#Bos--2018|Bos and Gupta 2018]] ). Near-term policy choices are particularly consequential for fast-growing economies. For example, Malik et al. (2020) found that 133 to 227 GW of coal capacity would be stranded after 2030 if India were to delay ambitious mitigation through 2030 and then pursue an ambitious, post-2030 climate strategy. [[#Cui--2021|Cui et al. (2021)]] identified 18% of old, small, inefficient coal plants for rapid near-term retirement in China to help achieve air quality, health, water, and other societal goals and a feasible coal phase-out under climate goals. Comparable magnitudes of stranded assets may also be created in Latin America when adding all announced, authorised, and procured power plants up to 2060 ( [[#González-Mahecha--2019|González-Mahecha et al. 2019]] ). Options to reduce carbon lock-in include reducing fossil fuels subsidies (Box 6.3), building CCS-ready facilities, or ensuring that facilities are appropriately designed for fuel switching ( [[#Budinis--2018|Budinis et al. 2018]] ). Substantial lock-in may necessitate considerable deployment of CDR to compensate for high cumulative emissions. Past and present energy sector investments have created technological, institutional, and behavioural path dependencies aligned towards coal, oil, and natural gas ( ''high confidence'' ). In several emerging economies, large projects are planned that address poverty reduction and economic development. Coal infrastructure may be the default choice for these investments without policies to invest in low-carbon infrastructure instead ( [[#Joshua--2020|Joshua and Alola 2020]] ; [[#Steckel--2020|Steckel et al. 2020]] ). Path dependencies frequently have sustainability implications beyond carbon emissions. (Box 6.2 and [[#6.7.7|Section 6.7.7]] ). There are several SDG co-benefits associated with decarbonisation of energy systems ( [[#6.7.7|Section 6.7.7]] ) (Sörgel et al. 2021). For example, coal mining communities frequently experience significant health and economic burdens from resource extraction. <div id="box-6.13" class="h2-container box-container"></div> <span id="box-6.13-stranded-assets"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-6
(section)
Add languages
Add topic