Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-17
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 17.5.2.6 Tracking Adaptation Finance ==== <div id="h3-33-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> Adaptation finance tracking is capturing the financial flows associated with adaptation. It can indicate how much is being spent on adaptation, where funds are going to and whether spending matches allocated budgets. Thus, adaptation finance tracking can provide useful information for decision-making, but it does not provide information on the achievements resulting from the invested funds. Accordingly, it can complement, but not substitute, M&E of actions and outcomes. Adaptation finance tracking can be applied domestically ( [[#Guzmán--2017|Guzmán et al., 2017]] ; [[#Guzmán--2018|Guzmán et al., 2018]] ) as well as internationally, for instance by developed countries to report on the goal to mobilise USD 100 billion yr −1 by 2020 in climate finance ( [[#UNFCCC%20SCF--2018|UNFCCC SCF, 2018]] ). Data on adaptation finance can be used alongside information on planning and implementation to assess adaptation progress ( [[#UNEP--2021a|UNEP, 2021a]] ). Tracking adaptation finance requires defining what counts as adaptation. Different definitions can lead to large variations in the estimated amount of adaptation finance ( [[#Donner--2016|Donner et al., 2016]] ; [[#Hall--2017|Hall, 2017]] ). A further challenge is how to account for adaptation that is mainstreamed, that is, where adaptation-specific investments form only part of a larger programme or budget line, or where actions contribute to adaptation without being labelled as adaptation. These challenges limit the direct comparability between adaptation and mitigation finance ( [[#UNFCCC--2019a|UNFCCC, 2019a]] ). In fact, tracking adaptation finance differs from tracking mitigation finance since activities cannot be ''a priori'' assumed to constitute adaptation but instead have to be assessed for their linkage to climate risks in a particular context (MDBs & IDFC, 2018). Methods for adaptation finance tracking continue to be further developed aiming at better comparability and completeness ( [[#Richmond--2019|Richmond and Hallmeyer, 2019]] ; [[#Richmond--2021|Richmond et al., 2021]] ). Various methods are used to track adaptation finance, which makes comparisons between adaptation finance figures challenging ( [[#UNFCCC%20SCF--2018|UNFCCC SCF, 2018]] ; [[#Weikmans--2019|Weikmans and Roberts, 2019]] ). For example, multi-lateral development banks use a different methodology than countries do under the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) (Box 17.4; [[#MDBs--2019|MDBs, 2019]] ). One of the differences concerns the treatment of partially adaptation-relevant projects, namely whether only parts or the full amount of a given project volume are counted as adaptation finance (see, e.g., [[#MDBs--2019|MDBs, 2019]] ). Under the OECD DAC methodology, countries often use a fixed percentage (e.g., 50% of the total project value), whereas the MDB methodology attempts for a project-specific estimation of the adaptation-relevant proportion (MDBs & IDFC, 2018). Another aspect is whether tracking distinguishes between financial instruments, such as grants or loans. Different accounting rules can lead to large differences in reported amounts of adaptation finance and to a lack of comparability between providers ( [[#Weikmans--2019|Weikmans and Roberts, 2019]] ). Studies identified an over-reporting (i.e., counting non-adaptation-related finance) by a factor of two to three, which suggests the need for a more consistent and transparent accounting system ( [[#Weikmans--2017|Weikmans et al., 2017]] ; [[#CARE--2021|CARE, 2021]] ). Good coverage of adaptation finance data exists around international public finance flows, predominantly official development assistance flows from OECD DAC members and from multi-lateral development banks. Less data exist around domestic public finance and private finance flows to adaptation activities, but data sources continue to be further expanded, for example through climate change expenditure tagging and city-level data ( [[#Weikmans--2017|Weikmans et al., 2017]] ; [[#UNFCCC%20SCF--2018|UNFCCC SCF, 2018]] ; [[#Richmond--2021|Richmond et al., 2021]] ). Recent estimates of adaptation finance are provided in [[#UNFCCC%20SCF--2018|UNFCCC SCF (2018)]] , [[#Macquarie--2020|Macquarie et al. (2020)]] and Cross-Chapter Box FAR in this Chapter. <div id="17.5.2.7" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="evaluation-and-learning"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-17
(section)
Add languages
Add topic