Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-2
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 2.6.1.7 Demand management in the food sector (diet change, waste reduction) ==== <div id="section-2-6-1-7-demand-management-in-the-food-sector-diet-change-waste-reduction-block-1"></div> Demand-side management has the potential for climate change mitigation via reducing emissions from production, switching to consumption of less emission intensive commodities and making land available for CO <sub>2</sub> removal (Section 5.5.2). Reducing food losses and waste increases the overall efficiency of food value chains (with less land and inputs needed) along the entire supply chain and has the potential to mitigate 0.8–4.5 GtCO <sub>2</sub> -eq yr <sup>–1</sup> ( ''high confidence'' ) (Bajželj et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1853|1853]]</sup> ; Dickie et al 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1854|1854]]</sup> ; Hawken 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1855|1855]]</sup> ; Hiç et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1856|1856]]</sup> ) (Section 5.5.2.5). Shifting to diets that are lower in emissions-intensive foods like beef delivers a mitigation potential of 0.7–8.0 GtCO <sub>2</sub> -eq yr <sup>–1</sup> ( ''high confidence'' ) (Bajželj et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1857|1857]]</sup> ; Dickie et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1858|1858]]</sup> ; Herrero et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1859|1859]]</sup> ; Hawken 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1860|1860]]</sup> ; Springmann et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1861|1861]]</sup> ; Tilman and Clark 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1862|1862]]</sup> ; Hedenus et al. 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1863|1863]]</sup> ; Stehfest et al. 2009 <sup>[[#fn:r1864|1864]]</sup> ) with most of the higher end estimates (>6 GtCO <sub>2</sub> -eq yr <sup>–1</sup> ) based on veganism, vegetarianism or very low ruminant meat consumption (Section 5.5.2). In addition to direct mitigation gains, decreasing meat consumption, primarily of ruminants, and reducing wastes further reduces water use, soil degradation, pressure on forests and land used for feed potentially freeing up land for mitigation (Tilman and Clark 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1865|1865]]</sup> ) (Chapters 5 and 6). Additionally, consumption of locally produced food, shortening the supply chain, can in some cases minimise food loss, contribute to food security and reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption and food loss (Section 5.5.2.6). <span id="integrated-pathways-for-climate-change-mitigation"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-2
(section)
Add languages
Add topic