Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-4
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 4.3.3.6.4 Social values ===== Social values refer to what people consider of critical importance about the places in which they live, and range from material to immaterial things (assets, beliefs, etc.; Hurlimann et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1371|1371]]</sup> ; Rouse et al., 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1372|1372]]</sup> ). Consideration of social values offers an opportunity to address a wider perspective on impacts on human systems, for example, complementary to quantitative assessments of health impacts (e.g., loss of source of calories and food insecurity; Keim, 2010 <sup>[[#fn:r1374|1374]]</sup> ). This also encompasses immaterial dimensions, such as threats to cultural heritage (Marzeion and Levermann, 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1374|1374]]</sup> ; Fatorić and Seekamp, 2017a <sup>[[#fn:r1375|1375]]</sup> ), socialising activities (Karlsson et al., 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1376|1376]]</sup> ), integration of marginalised groups (Maldonado, 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1377|1377]]</sup> ) and cultural ecosystem services (Fish et al., 2016), and provides an opportunity to better reflect context-specificities in valuing the physical/ecological/human/cultural impacts’ importance for and distribution within a given society (Fatorić and Seekamp, 2017b <sup>[[#fn:r1379|1379]]</sup> ). This field of research (no detailed mention found in AR5) is just emerging due to the transdisciplinary and qualitative nature of the topic. Graham et al. (2013) <sup>[[#fn:r1380|1380]]</sup> advance a 5-category framing of social values specifically at risk from SLR: health (i.e., the social determinants of survival such as environmental and housing quality and healthy lifestyles), feeling of safety (e.g., financial and job security), belongingness (i.e., attachment to places and people), self-esteem (e.g., social status or pride that can be affected by coastal retreat), and self-actualisation (i.e., people’s efforts to define their own identity). Another emerging issue relates to social values at risk due to land submergence in low-lying islands (Yamamoto and Esteban, 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1381|1381]]</sup> ) and parts of countries and individual properties (Marino, 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r1382|1382]]</sup> ; Maldonado et al., 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1383|1383]]</sup> ; Aerts, 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1384|1384]]</sup> ; Allgood and McNamara, 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1385|1385]]</sup> ). Recent studies also highlight the potential additional risks to social values in areas where displaced people relocate (Davis et al., 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1386|1386]]</sup> ). <span id="conclusion-on-coastal-risk-reasons-for-concern-and-future-risks"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-4
(section)
Add languages
Add topic