Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-9
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 9.6.2.5 Last Deglacial Transition: Meltwater pulse 1A ==== <div id="h3-46-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> During Meltwater pulse 1A (MWP-1A), GMSL ''very likely'' ( ''medium confidence'' ) rose by 8β15 m ( [[#Liu--2016|Liu et al., 2016]] ). Consistent with AR5, the drivers of this rapid rise remain ambiguous. The spatial patterns of RSL change over this interval are inadequately observed to constrain the relative contributions of the North American and Antarctic ice sheets ( [[#Liu--2016|Liu et al., 2016]] ). Modelling studies of the North American Ice Sheet permit a 3β6 m ( [[#Gregoire--2016|Gregoire et al., 2016]] ) or 6β9 m contribution over the duration of MWP-1A ( [[#Tarasov--2012|Tarasov et al., 2012]] ). Sedimentological evidence ( [[#Weber--2014|Weber et al., 2014]] ; [[#Bart--2018|Bart et al., 2018]] ) provides near-field evidence for an Antarctic contribution, consistent with modelling studies ( [[#Golledge--2014|Golledge et al., 2014]] ; [[#Stuhne--2015|Stuhne and Peltier, 2015]] ), but does not constrain the magnitude of the contribution. A recent statistical analysis of Norwegian Sea and Arctic Ocean sediments suggests a 3β7 m contribution from the Eurasian Ice Sheet ( [[#Brendryen--2020|Brendryen et al., 2020]] ), a possibility not considered in AR5 or the meta-analysis of [[#Liu--2016|Liu et al. (2016)]] . In summary, MWP-1A appears to have been driven by a combination of melt in North America ( ''high confidence'' ), Eurasia ( ''low confidence'' ), and Antarctica ( ''low confidence'' ), but the budget is not closed. <div id="9.6.2.6" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="holocene"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-9
(section)
Add languages
Add topic