Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-4
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Blue carbon and mitigation co-benefits of adaptation actions ===== <div id="h4-10-siblings" class="h4-siblings"></div> The Paris Agreement recognises that mitigation co-benefits resulting from Parties’ adaptation actions and/or economic diversification plans can contribute to mitigation outcomes ( [[#UNFCCC--2015a|UNFCCC 2015a]] : Article 4.7). Blue carbon refers to biologically-driven carbon flux or storage in coastal ecosystems such as seagrasses, salt marshes, and mangroves ( [[#Wylie--2016|Wylie et al. 2016]] ; [[#Fennessy--2019|Fennessy et al. 2019]] ; [[#Fourqurean--2012|Fourqurean et al. 2012]] ; [[#Tokoro--2014|Tokoro et al. 2014]] ) (see Cross-Chapter Box 8 on blue carbon as a storage medium and removal process). Restoring or protecting coastal ecosystems is a mitigation action with synergies with adaptation and development. Such restoration has been described as a ‘no regrets’ mitigation option in the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate ( [[#Bindoff--2019|Bindoff et al. 2019]] ) and advocated as a climate solution at national scales ( [[#Bindoff--2019|Bindoff et al. 2019]] ; [[#Taillardat--2018|Taillardat et al. 2018]] ; [[#Fargione--2018|Fargione et al. 2018]] ) and global scales ( [[#Howard--2017|Howard et al. 2017]] ). On a per-area basis, carbon stocks in coastal ecosystems can be higher than in terrestrial forests ( [[#Howard--2017|Howard et al. 2017]] ), with below-ground carbon storage up to 1000 tC ha –1 ( [[#McLeod--2011|McLeod et al. 2011]] ; [[#Crooks--2018|Crooks et al. 2018]] ; [[#Bindoff--2019|Bindoff et al. 2019]] ). Overall, coastal vegetated systems have a mitigation potential of around 0.5% of current global emissions, with an upper limit of less than 2% ( [[#Bindoff--2019|Bindoff et al. 2019]] ). Restoration or protection of coastal ecosystems is an important adaptation action with multiple benefits, with bounded global mitigation benefits ( [[#Gattuso--2018|Gattuso et al. 2018]] ; [[#Bindoff--2019|Bindoff et al. 2019]] ). Such restoration/preservation reduces coastal erosion and protects from storm surges, and otherwise mitigates impacts of sea level rise and extreme weather along the coast line ( [[#Siikamäki--2012|Siikamäki et al. 2012]] ; [[#Romañach--2018|Romañach et al. 2018]] ; Alongi 2008). Restoration of tidal flow to coastal wetlands inhibits methane emissions which occur in fresh and brackish water ( [[#Kroeger--2017|Kroeger et al. 2017]] ) ( [[IPCC:Wg3:Chapter:Chapter-7#7.4.2.8|Section 7.4.2.8]] describes a more inclusive set of ecosystem services provided by coastal wetlands). Coastal habitat restoration projects can also provide significant social benefits in the form of job creation (through tourism and recreation opportunities), as well as ecological benefits through habitat preservation ( [[#Edwards--2013|Edwards et al. 2013]] ; [[#Sutton-Grier--2015|Sutton-Grier et al. 2015]] ; [[#Sutton-Grier--2016|Sutton-Grier and Moore 2016]] ; [[#Wylie--2016|Wylie et al. 2016]] ; [[#Kairo--2018|Kairo et al. 2018]] ; [[#Bindoff--2019|Bindoff et al. 2019]] ). Coastal ecosystem-based mitigation can be cost-effective, but interventions should be designed with care. One concern is to assure that actions remain effective at higher levels of climate change (Alongi 2015; [[#Bindoff--2019|Bindoff et al. 2019]] ). Also, methane emissions from ecosystems may partially reduce the benefit of the carbon sequestration ( [[#Rosentreter--2018|Rosentreter et al. 2018]] ) depending on the salinity ( [[#Poffenbarger--2011|Poffenbarger et al. 2011]] ; [[#Kroeger--2017|Kroeger et al. 2017]] ). As the main driver of mangrove forest loss is aquaculture/agriculture ( [[#Thomas--2017|Thomas et al. 2017]] ), there may be entrenched interests opposing restoration and protection actions. <div id="Restoration and protection of terrestrial ecosystems" class="h4-container"></div> <span id="restoration-and-protection-of-terrestrial-ecosystems"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-4
(section)
Add languages
Add topic