Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-8
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 8.4.2.7 Atmospheric Blocking ==== <div id="h3-40-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> In AR5, the increased ability of models to simulate blocking and higher agreement on projections led to an assessment with ''medium confidence'' that the frequency of NH and SH blocking will not increase, but future changes in blocking intensity and persistence were deemed uncertain (AR5 Chapter 14, ES and Box 14.2). Blocking influences precipitation (e.g., [[#Trigo--2004|Trigo et al., 2004]] ), flooding (e.g., Yamada et al. , 2016) , drought (e.g., Dong et al. , 2018b) , snow (e.g., [[#García-Herrera--2006|García-Herrera and Barriopedro, 2006]] ) , and glacier melt (e.g., [[#Hanna--2013|Hanna et al., 2013]] ), and so is of broad importance to the water cycle in areas of blocking activity. Blocking projections are assessed in this Report in [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-4|Chapter 4]] ( [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-4#4.5.1.6|Section 4.5.1.6]] ), and model performance in simulating blocking is also discussed in [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-3|Chapter 3]] ( [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-3#3.3.3.3|Section 3.3.3.3]] ). CMIP5 projections suggest a complex response in blocking frequencies with an eastward shift in NH winter blocking, mid-latitude decreases in boreal summer except in eastern Europe – western Russia, and SH decreases in the Pacific sector during austral spring and summer. CMIP6 projections (Figure. 4.28) show a notable decrease in blocking activity over Greenland and the North Pacific for the SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. However, the continued large differences among current models as well as the sensitivity to blocking detection methods limits confidence in projected regional changes in blocking (see also [[IPCC:Wg1:Chapter:Chapter-10#10.3.3.3.1|Section 10.3.3.3.1]] ). The influence of blocking on multiple elements of the water cycle means that the uncertainty in blocking projections adds a corresponding layer of uncertainty to water cycle projections. In summary, and despite recent improvements in the simulation of blocking, there is ''limited evidence'' in model projections of future changes, except for boreal winter over Greenland and the North Pacific where there is high confidence that blocking events are not expected to increase in the SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. As with stationary waves, this adds uncertainty to mid-latitude water cycle projections at the regional scale. <div id="8.4.2.8" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="extratropical-cyclones-storm-tracks-and-atmospheric-rivers-1"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-8
(section)
Add languages
Add topic