Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-4
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 4.4.3.1 Actions by Others Not Consistent With Domestic efforts ==== <div id="h3-50-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> The international context is a major source of uncertainty for national-level planning, especially for small- or medium-sized open economies, because the outcome of domestic choices may significantly depend on decisions made by other countries and actor, over which national governments have limited or no control ( [[#Lachapelle--2013|Lachapelle and Paterson 2013]] ). Availability of foreign financial resources in countries with limited domestic savings (Baum et al. 2017) and availability of technology transfers ( [[#Glachant--2017|Glachant and Dechezleprêtre 2017]] ) are some examples. Other external decisions with significant bearing on domestic action include mitigation policies in other countries ( [[#Dai--2017|Dai et al. 2017]] ), and especially in major trading partners, the lack of which can result in competitive disadvantage for sectors exposed to international competition (Alton et al. 2014). The international prices of the key commodities (notably energy), goods and services are important, notably when shifting development pathway is based on structural change (e.g., [[#Willenbockel--2017|Willenbockel et al. 2017]] for Ghana and Kenya). Remedies include first devising policy packages that are, to the extent possible, robust to uncertainty regarding external decisions. For example, mitigation in the building sector is considered less problematic for competitiveness since the construction sector is less exposed to international competition. Remedies also include securing international cooperation to reduce the uncertainty that domestic decision-makers face about the international context. Shifting investments towards low-GHG solutions requires a combination of conducive public policies, attractive investment opportunities and financing of transitions ( [[IPCC:Wg3:Chapter:Chapter-15#15.6|Section 15.6]] ), which can enable shifting development pathways. Cooperation can generate positive spill overs through technology diffusion ( [[IPCC:Wg3:Chapter:Chapter-13#13.6.6|Section 13.6.6]] ). Third, cooperation is not limited to governments. As discussed in Section 4.2.3, international cooperative initiatives among non-state actors (cities, economic branches, etc.) can also provide know-how, resources and stable cooperative frameworks that reduce uncertainty for individual actors ( [[IPCC:Wg3:Chapter:Chapter-14#14.5.5|Section 14.5.5]] ). <div id="4.4.3.2" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="parts-of-complex-policy-packages-fail"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-4
(section)
Add languages
Add topic