Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-5
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 5.6.4.1 Agroecology ==== <div id="section-5-6-4-1-agroecology-block-1"></div> Agroecology (see Glossary) (Francis et al. 2003 <sup>[[#fn:r1074|1074]]</sup> ; Gliessman and Engles 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1075|1075]]</sup> ; Gliessman 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1076|1076]]</sup> ), provides knowledge for their design and management, including social, economic, political, and cultural dimensions (Dumont et al. 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1077|1077]]</sup> ). It started with a focus at the farm level but has expanded to include the range of food system activities (Benkeblia 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1078|1078]]</sup> ). Agroecology builds systems resilience through knowledge-intensive practices relying on traditional farming systems and co-generation of new insights and information with stakeholders through participatory action research (Menéndez et al. 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1079|1079]]</sup> ). It provides a multidimensional view of food systems within ecosystems, building on ILK and co-evolving with the experiences of local people, available natural resources, access to these resources, and ability to share and pass on knowledge among communities and generations, emphasising the inter-relatedness of all agroecosystem components and the complex dynamics of ecological processes (Vandermeer 1995 <sup>[[#fn:r1080|1080]]</sup> ). At the farm level, agroecological practices recycle biomass and regenerate soil biotic activities. They strive to attain balance in nutrient flows to secure favourable soil and plant growth conditions, minimise loss of water and nutrients, and improve use of solar radiation. Practices include efficient microclimate management, soil cover, appropriate planting time and genetic diversity. They seek to promote ecological processes and services such as nutrient cycling, balanced predator/prey interactions, competition, symbiosis, and successional changes. The overall goal is to benefit human and non-human communities in the ecological sphere, with fewer negative environmental or social impacts and fewer external inputs (Vandermeer et al. 1998 <sup>[[#fn:r1081|1081]]</sup> ; Altieri et al. 1998 <sup>[[#fn:r1082|1082]]</sup> ). From a food system focus, agroecology provides management options in terms of commercialisation and consumption through the promotion of short food chains and healthy diets (Pimbert and Lemke 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1083|1083]]</sup> ; Loconto et al. 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1084|1084]]</sup> ). Agroecology has been proposed as a key set of practices in building climate resilience (FAO et al. 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1085|1085]]</sup> ; Altieri et al. 2015 <sup>[[#fn:r1086|1086]]</sup> ). These can enhance on-farm diversity (of genes, species, and ecosystems) through a landscape approach (FAO 2018g <sup>[[#fn:r1087|1087]]</sup> ). Outcomes include soil conservation and restoration and thus soil carbon sequestration, reduction of the use of mineral and chemical fertilisers, watershed protection, promotion of local food systems, waste reduction, and fair access to healthy food through nutritious and diversified diets (Pimbert and Lemke 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1088|1088]]</sup> ; Kremen et al. 2012 <sup>[[#fn:r1089|1089]]</sup> ; Goh 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1090|1090]]</sup> ; Gliessman and Engles 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1091|1091]]</sup> ). A principle in agroecology is to contribute to food production by smallholder farmers (Altieri 2002 <sup>[[#fn:r1092|1092]]</sup> ). Since climatic events can severely impact smallholder farmers, there is a need to better understand the heterogeneity of small-scale agriculture in order to consider the diversity of strategies that traditional farmers have used and still use to deal with climatic variability. In Africa, many smallholder farmers cope with and even prepare for climate extremes, minimising crop failure through a series of agroecological practices (e.g., biodiversification, soil management, and water harvesting) (Mbow et al. 2014a <sup>[[#fn:r1093|1093]]</sup> ). Resilience to extreme climate events is also linked to on-farm biodiversity, a typical feature of traditional farming systems (Altieri and Nicholls 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1094|1094]]</sup> ). Critiques of agroecology refer to its explicit exclusion of modern biotechnology (Kershen 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1095|1095]]</sup> ) and the assumption that smallholder farmers are a uniform unit with no heterogeneity in power (and thus gender) relationships (Neira and Montiel 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1096|1096]]</sup> ; Siliprandi and Zuluaga Sánchez 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1097|1097]]</sup> ). <div id="section-5-6-4-2-climate-smart-agriculture"></div> <span id="climate-smart-agriculture"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SRCCL/Chapter-5
(section)
Add languages
Add topic